Dawn of Justice: Evaluating the Alignment of Women and Children in Aceh's Qanun Jinayat

Muzakkir Muzakkir*    -  Institut Agama Islam Negeri Langsa, Langsa, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
Aceh Qanun No. 6 of 2014 concerning the Jinayat Law can potentially eliminate justice for women and children. Through a literature study using a descriptive-analytical method, this article aims to interpret the substance of the Qanun Jinayat. The results show that the Qanun Jinayat has not taken sides with women and children. The first evidence, the preliminary evidence requirement for rape victims in the Qanun Jinayat, provides an opportunity to harm women. Victims may be unable to show evidence due to their psychological pressure. The second piece of evidence, the existence of legal dualism, between Article 81 and Article 82 of the Child Protection Law and Article 47 of the Qanun Jinayat, provides opportunities for violence to children. Qanun Jinayat provides lighter sentences to perpetrators. This article finds that the Qanun Jinayat was formulated and ratified with minimal involvement of many parties and absorption of community aspirations. The article recommends that the formulation of the Qanun Jinayat should be revised with consideration of the public benefit by involving modernist academics with a comprehensive religious education background.

Keywords: qanun jinayat; justice; women; children; discrimination

  1. Aditya, Webby. ‘The Effectiveness of Qanun Aceh No. 6/2014 of Jinayat Law in Order to Prevent Jinayah Khalwat in Law Territory of Sabang Municipality’. Nagari Law Review 1, no. 2 (2018): 191–98. https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.1.i.2.P.191-198.2018.
  2. Amdani, Yusi. ‘Ruler of Interests, Political Interests, or Law Enforcement: Case Study of Amnesty Plan for Din Minimi Group in East Aceh’. Al-Ahkam 28, no. 2 (2018): 245–62. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.2.2420.
  3. Andani, Meri. ‘Providing Preliminary Evidence in the Proofing Process of Rape Cases: Study of Article 52 of Aceh Qanun No.6/2014 Regarding Jinayat Law [Kewajiban Menyertakan Bukti Pemula oleh Korban dalam Proses Pembuktian Kasus Pemerkosaan: Studi Pasal 52 Qanun Aceh No. 6/2014’. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 9, no. 1 (2020): 46–66. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v9i1.7326.
  4. Andrisman, Tri. Asas-Asas dan Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung, 2009.
  5. Argenti, Gili. ‘Ideologisasi Partai Islam Masyumi di Indonesia’. JPI: Jurnal Politikom Indonesiana 5, no. 1 (2020): 37–57. https://doi.org/ 10.35706/JPI.v5i1.3731.
  6. Aziz, Samsudin. ‘Kanunisasi Fikih Jinayat Kontemporer; Studi Materi Muatan Qānūn Jināyat Aceh dan Brunei Darussalam’. Al-Ahkam 24, no. 2 (24 October 2014): 194. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2014.24.2.145.
  7. Danial, Danial. ‘Qanun Jinayat Aceh dan Perlindungan HAM (Kajian Yuridis-Filosofis)’. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 6, no. 1 (1 January 2012): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.24090/MNH.V6I1.590.
  8. Fadlia, Faradilla, and Ismar Ramadani. ‘The Definition of Private and Public Space in Implementation of Qanun Jinayat in Aceh’. Addin: Media Dialektika Ilmu Islam 13, no. 1 (2019): 141–60. https://doi.org/10.21043/addin.v13i1.3324.
  9. ———. ‘The Qanun Jinayat Discriminates Against Women (Victims of Rape) in Aceh, Indonesia’. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights 2, no. 2 (2018): 448–70. https://doi.org/10.19184/JSEAHR.V2I2.83 58.
  10. Fauzi, Muh. ‘Problematika Yuridis Legislasi Syariat Islam di Provinsi Nangroe Aceh Darussalam’. Al-Ahkam 22, no. 1 (2012): 1–26. https:// doi.org/10.21580/AHKAM.2012.22.1.1.
  11. Haris, Syamsuddin. Masalah-Masalah Demokrasi dan Kebangsaan Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Buku Obor, 2014.
  12. Idria, Reza. ‘Tales of the Unexpected: Contesting Syari’ah Law in Aceh, Indonesia’. Harvard University, 2020. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/37366008.
  13. Irham, M Aqil. ‘Pengamanan Pilar Bangsa dan Masa Depan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia’. Kalam 6, no. 1 (2012): 125–50. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/kalam/article/view/398.
  14. Ismail, Endri. ‘Analisis Yuridis terhadap Legalitas Qanun Aceh No. 6/2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat’. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 1 (2018): 123–48. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i1.9625.
  15. Jenawi, Belli. ‘Kajian Hukum terhadap Kendala dalam Perlindungan Hukum oleh Aparat Penegak Hukum terhadap Anak Korban Pelecehan Seksual’. Lex Crimen 6, no. 8 (2017): 102–8. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/17935.
  16. Krisna, Liza Agnesta, and Rini Fitriani. ‘Dualisme Kewenangan Mengadili Perkara Anak sebagai Pelaku Kejahatan Pelecehan Seksual di Kota Langsa-Aceh’. Jurnal Yuridis 5, no. 2 (2019): 262. https://doi. org/10.35586/.v5i2.771.
  17. Kumalasari, Reni. ‘Relasi Agama dan Politik di Aceh Pasca Konflik; Pemerintah Indonesia-Gerakan Aceh Merdeka’. Jurnal Adabiya 23, no. 1 (2021): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22373/adabiya.v23i1.75 92.
  18. Latif, Yudi. Genealogi Inteligensia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013.
  19. Mardhiah, Nellis, Rahma Hidayati, and Mursyidin Mursyidin. ‘Internalisasi Kebijakan Pemerintah Aceh Berdasarkan Undang–Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintah Aceh’. Jurnal Public Policy 4, no. 2 (2018): 180–86. https://doi.org/10.35308/JPP.v4i2.1049.
  20. Miswari. ‘Etnonasionalisme, Islamisme dan Bahaya Formalisasi Syariat Islam’. In Islam, Formalisasi Syariat Islam dan Post Islamisme di Aceh, edited by Miswari. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2019.
  21. ———. ‘Mu’dilat al-Aqlīyah al-Masīhīyah fī Ḥudūd Balad al-Sharī’ah al-Islāmīyah’. Studia Islamika 25, no. 2 (2018): 351–403. https://doi.org/ 10.15408/sdi.v25i2.6978.
  22. Munandar, Munandar. ‘Kedudukan Anak Sebagai Jinayah dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayah’. Syiah Kuala Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2017): 209–28. https://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/SKLJ/article/ view/12288.
  23. Mushthafa, Mushthafa. ‘Perbandingan Perkembangan Hukum Islam Pada Masa Klasik dan Masa Modern’. Ijtihad 32, no. 1 (2019). https:// doi.org/10.15548/ijt.V32I1.34.
  24. Nasution, Adelina. ‘Narsisme Ulama: Dilema dan Posibilitas Rekonstruksi Ushul Fiqh di Indonesia’. Al-Ahkam 28, no. 2 (2019): 219–44. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.2.2308.
  25. Nasution, I. F. A., M. Anzaikhan, S. bin Adam, and M. S. A. Latif. ‘Covid-19 In Islamic Theology and Its Impact on Socio-Religious Affairs In Indonesia’. European Journal of Science and Theology 18, no. 1 (2022): 51–65. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/pt/covidwho-1615294.
  26. Nasution, Ismail Fahmi Arrauf, and Miswari Miswari. ‘Al-'Ulamā' Warathatat al-Anbiyā’: Modernity and Nurture of Authority in Aceh Society’. Jurnal Theologia 30, no. 2 (2019): 197–216. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2019.30.2.3845.
  27. Nasution, Ismail Fahmi Arrauf, Miswari Miswari, and Sabaruddin Sabaruddin. ‘Preserving Identity through Modernity: Dayah al-Aziziyah and Its Negotiations with Modernity in Aceh’. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (2019): 211–32. https://doi.org/10.21009/hayula.003.2.06.
  28. Nurdin, Ridwan. ‘Kedudukan Qanun Jinayat Aceh dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Nasional Indonesia’. Miqot: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 42, no. 2 (2018): 356–78. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot. v42i2.542.
  29. Rachmad, Andi, Yusi Amdani, and Zaki Ulya. ‘Kontradiksi Pengaturan Hukuman Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual terhadap Anak di Aceh’. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 10, no. 2 (2021): 315–36. https://doi. org/10.25216/JHP.10.2.2021.315-336.
  30. Salwa, Nany, Nurhasanah Nurhasanah, and Cut Atria Siska. ‘Analisa Data Kemiskinan di Provinsi Aceh Menggunakan Model Efek Tetap’. Statistika: Forum Teori dan Aplikasi Statistika 16, no. 1 (2016): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29313/JSTAT.v16i1.2276.
  31. Saputra, Happy, Mahdalena Nasrun, and Muhammad Anzaikhan. ‘Revitalizing Local Wisdom in Committing Radicalism in Aceh’. Innovatio: Journal for Religious Innovations Studies 21, no. 2 (2021): 112–21. https://doi.org/10.30631/innovatio.V21I2.140.
  32. Sufrizal, and M. Anzaikhan. ‘Pernikahan Sedarah dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam’. Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam 5, no. 2 (2020): 130–49. https://doi.org/10.32505/ legalite.v5i2.2782.
  33. Yuhermansyah, Edi, and Meri Andani. ‘Tanggapan Masyarakat Kecamatan Pulau Banyak terhadap Pemberlakuan Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat’. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 7, no. 1 (2018): 43. https://doi.org/10.22373/ legitimasi.V7I1.3964.
  34. Yuwono, Ismantoro Dwi. Penerapan Hukum dalam Kasus Kekerasan Seksual terhadap Anak. Yogyakarta: MedPress, 2018.
  35. Zarkasy, Tgk. ‘Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Dayah’. In Wacana Pemikiran Santri Dayah Aceh, edited by Khairizzaman and Abidin Nurdin. Banda Aceh: Wacana Press, 2006.
  36. Zukhdi, Muhammad. ‘Dinamika Perbedaan Madzhab dalam Islam (Studi terhadap Pengamalan Madzhab di Aceh)’. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 17, no. 1 (2017): 121–49. https://doi.org/10.22373/JIIF. V17I1.1024.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: alahkam@walisongo.ac.id

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps