Post-Divorce Child’s Nafaqah Māḍiyah: An Analysis of the Shifting from Fulfilment to the Assertion of Ownership Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.1.14566Keywords:
nafaqah māḍiyah for children, li al-intifā’, li al-tamlīk, istiḥsān, Religious CourtAbstract
The claim for child’s nafaqah māḍiyah (past income) is often overlooked in the rulings of the Religious Court. This research aims to propose a shifting from the concept of li al-intifā’ (benefit) to li al-tamlīk (ownership) regarding child’s living costs claims in the Religious Court, employing the istihsān (juristic preference) approach. The objective is to ensure a more equitable judgment for the child. This study was conducted as a literature review using a normative juridical approach. The research findings reveal that the legal standpoint, which rejects any claim for child’s nafaqah māḍiyah in the Religious Court based on the argument that child’s living costs is categorized as li al-intifā’, contradicts Islamic legal principles regarding child’s living costs and fails to fulfill the principles of justice, as well as being incongruent with several other legislative provisions related to child protection. Therefore, this article proposes a shifting from the concept of li al-intifā’ to li al-tamlīk in determining child’s nafaqah māḍiyah in the Religious Court.Downloads
References
A., Salma, Elfia A., and Afifah Djalal. “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Perempuan dan Anak (Analisis Putusan Hakim tentang Nafkah Madhiyah pada Pengadilan Agama di Sumatera Barat).” Istinbath 16, no. 1 (2017): 106–208. https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.V16I1.77.
Alimuddin, Alimuddin. “The Urgency of the Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah in Reasoning Islamic Law.” Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal 1, no. 2 (2019): 117–23. https://doi.org/10.33258/biohs.v1i2.42.
Arto, A. Mukti. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.
Asnawi, M. Natsir. Pembaharuan Hukum Perdata (Pendekatan Tematik). Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2019.
Asni, Asni, Ashadi L. Diab, Kartini Kartini, and Kamarudddin Kamarudddin. “The Urgency of Transdisciplinary Approaches in Contemporary Islamic Law Studies.” KnE Social Sciences 2022 (2022): 615–22. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i8.10779.
al-Bāḥusayn, Ya’qūb ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhāb. al-Istiḥsān Ḥaqīqatuh Anwā’uh Ḥujjiyyatuh Taṭbīqatuh al-Mu’āṣirah. Riyāḍ: Maktabah al-Rushd, 2007.
Bedir, Murteza. “The Power of Interpretation: Is Istiḥsān Qiyās?” Islamic Studies 42, no. 1 (2003): 7–20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20837249.
Bintarawati, Fenny, and Maskur Rosyid. “Mengurai Istiḥsān sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam.” Mumtaz: Jurnal Studi al-Quran dan Keislaman 4, no. 2 (2020): 211–32. https://doi.org/10.36671/mumtaz.v4i02.137.
Busyro. Maqashid al-Syari’ah. Ponorogo: Wadegrup, 2017.
Chadziq, Achamad Lubabul. “Istihsan dan Implementasinya dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam.” Miyah: Jurnal Studi Islam 15, no. 2 (2019): 337–48. https://doi.org/10.33754/miyah.v15i2.192.
Darliana, Darliana, Sapriadi Sapriadi, St. Hadijah Wahid, and Muhammad Azhar Nur. “Pembaharuan Hukum Islam di Indonesia (Pendekatan Metode Istihsan).” Jurnal al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam 4, no. 1 (2022): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-ahkam.v4i1.851.
Gandi, Aria. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam tentang Penolakan terhadap Gugatan Nafkah Lampau Anak (Studi Putusan Hakim Nomor: 0207/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Bn).” [Undergraduate Thesis]. Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Bengkulu, 2020.
Hafid, M. “The Concept of Istihsan Abu Hanifah in Indonesian Islamic Family Law (Review of Marriage Registration as an Accumulative Condition).” Legal Brief 11, no. 2 (2022): 583–95. https://legal.isha.or.id/index.php/legal/article/view/163.
Hanafi, Syawaluddin. “Urgensi Pemikiran Syams al-Aimmah al-Syarakhsi tentang al-Istihsan dalam Menjawab Problematika Hukum dalam Masyarakat.” Tasamuh: Jurnal Studi Islam 12, no. 2 (2020): 335–54. https://doi.org/10.47945/tasamuh.v12i2.252.
Harahap, Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Ḥassan, Ḥusain Ḥamīd. Naẓariyyat al-Maṣlaḥat fi al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Riyāḍ: Dār al-Nahḍah al-’Arabiyyah, n.d.
Ismail, Mohd Hazwan, and Jasni Sulong. “Saman Penghutang Penghakiman: Keperluan Perintah Nafkah atau Perintah Tunggakan Nafkah.” Journal of Contemporary Islamic Law 6, no. 1 (2021): 29–38.
Isnaini, Enik. “Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Perjudian Online Menurut Hukum Positif di Indonesia.” Jurnal Independent 5, no. 1 (2017): 23–32. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v5i1.61.
Isnataini Nur, Fitriana. “Upaya Istri dalam Memperoleh Nafkah Iddah dan Nafkah Madhiyah dalam Perceraian (Studi Kasus Putusan Banding No. 125/Pdt.G/PTA Smg).” [Undergraduate Thesis]. IAIN Salatiga, 2019.
Jahar, Asep Saepudin. “al-Bid’ah versus al-Mashlahah al-Mursalah and al-Istihsân: al-Syâthibî’s Legal Framework.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 12, no. 1 (2012): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v12i1.975.
Jati, Cahya Samekta, Muhyidin Muhyidin, and Suparno Suparno. “Pelaksanaan Tuntutan Nafkah Terhutang Suami pada Perkara Perceraian sebagai Pemenuhan Hak Istri (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Banyumas).” Diponegoro Law Journal 10, no. 3 (2021): 596–608. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2021.27122.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. “Definition and Meaning of Maqāṣid.” In Actualization (Taf’īl) of the Higher Purposes (Maqāṣid) of Shariah, 5–6. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), 2020.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. “‘Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah’: The Objectives of Islamic Law.” Islamic Studies 38, no. 2 (1999): 193–208. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20837037.
Kamurudin, Abang. “Nafkah Anak Pasca Penceraian Studi Perbandingan di Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia dan Malaysia.” Sakina: Journal of Family Studies 3, no. 4 (2019).
Kayadibi, Saim. “Formation of the Concept of Istiḥsān in Islamic Law.” In Pool Finance Economic System: Law, Democracy, Alliance of Civilization, 152–78. Selangor: International Islamic University of Malaysia, 2011.
Mansari, Mansari, and Moriyanti Moriyanti. “Sensitivitas Hakim terhadap Perlindungan Nafkah Isteri Pasca Perceraian.” Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies 5, no. 1 (2019): 43–58. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v5i1.5377.
Mat Salleh, Hasiah, Mohd. Norhusairi Mat Hussin, and Raihanah Hj Abdullah. “Perlindungan Hak Warga Emas dalam Perundangan di Malaysia.” Kanun Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia 34, no. 1 (2022): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.37052/kanun.34(1)no1.
Muhidin, Muhidin, Eman Suparman, M. Guntur Hamzah, and Indra Officer. “Implementation of the Ius Curia Novit Principle in Examining Case at the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia.” Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 15, no. 1 (2022): 453–65. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2022-00030.
Muslimin, JM, and M Abdul Kharis. “Istihsan and Istishab in Islamic Legal Reasoning: Towards the Extension of Legal Finding in the Context of Indonesia.” al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 20, no. 2 (2020): 163–79. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v20i2.589.
Mustofa, Ahmad Alif. “Nafkah Madliyah Anak dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif: Studi Atas Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 608/K/AG/2003.” [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, 2020.
MZ, Husamuddin, and Harwis Alimuddin. “The Urgency of Maqāşid al-Sharīa in Strengthening Religious Moderation in Aceh.” al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum 22, no. 2 (2022): 105–20. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.29781.
Nabilah, Wardatun, Arifki Budia Warman, and Nurul Aini Octavia. “Istihsan dalam Literatur Syafi’iyah (Telaah Istihsan dalam Kitab al-Mustaṣfa al-Ghazali).” Juris (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 20, no. 1 (2021): 77–89. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i1.3323.
Noorwahidah, Noorwahidah. “Istihsan: Dalil Syara` Yang Diperselisihkan.” Syariah Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran 16, no. 1 (2017): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v16i1.1001.
Qudāmah, ‘Abdullāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn. Rawḍah al-Nāẓir Wa Jannah al-Manāẓir fī Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Riyāḍ: Maktabah al-Rushd, 1993.
Rohman, Holilur. Maqashid al-Syariah. Malang: Setara Press, 2019.
Sanusi, Ahmad. “Menggagas Fiqih Moderat (Studi Analisis Kritis atas Metode Ijtihad Fiqih).” Syaksia: Jurnal Hukum Perdata Islam 20, no. 2 (2020): 243–78. https://doi.org/10.37035/syakhsia.v20i2.2352.
al-Sarakhsī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Abī Sahl. Uṣūl al-Sarakhsī. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1982.
Sarkun, Miftahurrohim N. “Athār Ta‘Āruḍ Manhaj al-Fikr bayna Abū Ḥanīfa wa’l-Shāfi’ī ‘an al-Istiḥsān Ansha’at al-Ḥadarat al-Islāmiyyah.” al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 51, no. 1 (2013): 217–46. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2013.511.217-246.
Suharto, Mukhamad. “Perspektif Hukum Islam-Sosial terhadap Kontekstualisasi Nafkah Cerai Gugat.” Khuluqiyya: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Studi Islam 2, no. 1 (2020): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.56593/khuluqiyya.v2i1.39.
Syarifuddin, Amir. Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.
al-Taftazani. Syarh al-Talwih ‘ala al-Tawdhih 2. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyah, n.d.
Wahid, Abd. “Penggunaan Metode Istishlahi/Maqoshid dalam Istinbath Hukum Fiqh.” Mukammil Jurnal Kajian Keislaman 3, no. 1 (2020): 21–34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
By submitting an article to the journal, the author(s) agree to transfer the published article's copyright to the journal, which will act as the publisher. This means the journal will have the right to publish the article in various forms, including reprints. The journal will maintain the publishing rights to the published articles.
In line with the license, authors and third parties (readers, researchers, and others) are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
