Information literacy as an epistemic negotiation of the utilization of artificial intelligence at Institut Pertanian Stiper Library

Main Article Content

Helmi Afroda
Ayuna Meilawati

Abstract

Purpose. This study aims to examine and conceptually explain how information literacy functions as an epistemic negotiation mechanism in AI-mediated academic environments.


Methods: This qualitative case study was conducted at the Institut Pertanian Stiper (INSTIPER) Yogyakarta Library using semi-structured interviews with lecturers and students, supported by institutional documents on information literacy and AI-related academic policies. The data were analyzed thematically through transcription, coding, categorization, and interpretative analysis.


Findings. The findings demonstrate that information literacy functions as an epistemic negotiation mechanism through which lecturers, researchers, and students critically evaluate, verify, and justify AI-generated knowledge before integrating it into academic practice. The study further reveals that the INSTIPER Yogyakarta Library has evolved beyond its conventional role as an information service to an institutional actor that strengthens AI literacy, mediates institutional AI governance, promotes data ethics and digital information security, and supports responsible knowledge production.


Implications. The principal contribution of this study lies in conceptualizing information literacy as an epistemic negotiation mechanism that connects the institutional epistemic role of academic libraries with AI governance and individual scholarly judgment. This conceptual framework extends current discussions beyond AI adoption and AI literacy, providing a foundation for developing evidence-based information literacy programs and institutional AI governance that strengthen academic integrity in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Afroda, H., & Meilawati, A. (2026). Information literacy as an epistemic negotiation of the utilization of artificial intelligence at Institut Pertanian Stiper Library. Daluang: Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.21580/daluang.v6i1.2026.32082
Section
Research Articles

References

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2025). AI competencies for academic library workers. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/2025-10/acrl_ai_competencies.pdf

Alkhatib, O. J., Khan, A. U., & Farnaz, S. (2025). AI and academic discourse: A sociolinguistic analysis of language and interaction. ACADEMIA International Journal for Social Sciences, 4(4), 6049–6061. https://doi.org/10.63056/ACAD.004.04.1436

Almryad, A. S., & Musa, H. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in scientific writing: A higher education review. Academic Platform Journal of Engineering and Smart Systems, 13(3), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.21541/APJESS.1676506

Awalia, R. S., Nuhaa, A. F., Putbyhah, M. A., & Oktalis. (2025). Analisis penggunaan DeepL Write AI sebagai teknologi pendukung dalam perbaikan penulisan bahasa asing di kalangan mahasiswa. Jurnal Bima: Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 3(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.61132/BIMA.V3I2.1702

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

Chetwynd, E. (2024). Ethical use of artificial intelligence for scientific writing: Current trends. Journal of Human Lactation, 40(2), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344241235160

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DeGlopper, K. S., & Stowe, R. L. (2024). Modeling students' epistemic cognition in undergraduate chemistry courses: A review. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(3), 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00348E

Dewi, P., NC, D., Safitri, D., & Banyumurti, I. (2025). Indonesia AI literacy, insights & framework. ICT Watch.

Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. (2024). Buku panduan penggunaan generative AI pada pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Frau-Meigs, D. (2024). User empowerment through media and information literacy responses to the evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GAI): Summary. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000388548

Granjeiro, J. M., Cury, A. A. D. B., Cury, J. A., Bueno, M., Sousa-Neto, M. D., & Estrela, C. (2025). The future of scientific writing: AI tools, benefits, and ethical implications. Brazilian Dental Journal, 36, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-644020256471

Hendrawan, M. R., & Putra, P. (2022). Integrasi manajemen pengetahuan dan literasi informasi: Pendekatan konsep dan praktik. UB Press.

Hirvonen, N. (2024). Information literacy after the AI revolution. Journal of Information Literacy, 18(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.11645/18.1.593

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40593-021-00239-1

Holzinger, A., Plass, M., Kickmeier-Rust, M., Holzinger, K., Crişan, G. C., Pintea, C. M., & Palade, V. (2019). Interactive machine learning: Experimental evidence for the human in the algorithmic loop. Applied Intelligence, 49, 2401–2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10489-018-1361-5

Hu, H., Zhou, Q., & Hashim, H. (2025). Negotiating identity in the age of ChatGPT: Non-native English researchers' experiences with AI-assisted academic writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05351-4

Itsnaini, W., Tzanisa, K., Madania, I., ‘Aisy, R. R., Yazid, M. A., & Sulistyani, A. (2025). Peran literasi digital di era artificial intelligence terhadap kualitas pembelajaran mahasiswa: Studi pustaka—analisis konseptual dan temuan penelitian tentang literasi digital mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis AI. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.23969/JP.V10I04.38512

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2023.102274

Lim, J. S. (2026). Introduction to generative artificial intelligence tools for academic article writing. Science Editing, 13(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.6087/KCSE.393

Lusiyanti, Apdillah, D., & Sari, K. (2025). Kecerdasan buatan dalam pendidikan: Meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dengan teknologi. Dira Media Kreasindo.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.

OCTAVE–John Keells Group. (2025). From data literacy to AI literacy: Navigating the next frontier in the digital age. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-data-literacy-ai-navigating-next-frontier-digital-age-wnurc/

Pinski, M., & Benlian, A. (2024). AI literacy for users: A comprehensive review and future research directions of learning methods, components, and effects. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBAH.2024.100062

Rustandi, F., Nugraha, H., Munawaroh, C., & Hambali, A. (2025). Hakikat ilmu pengetahuan dalam era AI: Mempertahankan integritas epistemologi di tengah automasi. Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM), 6(2), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.36312/10.36312/VOL6ISS2PP296-307

Sugiyono. (2024). Buku metode penelitian kualitatif: Untuk penelitian yang bersifat eksploratif, enterpretif, interaktif dan konstruktif (Edisi 3). Alfabeta.

Tarbiyati, R., & Riady, Y. (2025). The role of information literacy in improving students' abilities in the digital era. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology, 4(9), 2989–2998. https://doi.org/10.55927/FJST.V4I9.226

Ulum, M. C., Anindyka, A., & Sukarno, K. D. (2025). The importance of transformative libraries and librarians' role. Jurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan, 13(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.24198/JKIP.V13I1.52373

UNESCO Jakarta. (2024). Indonesia: Laporan penilaian kesiapan (readiness assessment) kecerdasan artifisial (AI). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000392317_ind

Zhao, W. (2025). Enhancing academic writing efficiency with ChatGPT: A natural language processing framework for innovation, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of ICT Standardization, 13(4), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.13052/JICTS2245-800X.1341

Zipf, S. T., Petricini, T., & Borrelli, S. (2026). "I shouldn't be saying this": Library-based student confessions about AI, cheating, and academic integrity. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 52(4), 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2026.103259

Zulmi, M. R., Jazuli, A., Riani, N., Studi, P., Perpustakaan, I., Adab, F., Budaya, I., Islam, U., Sunan, N., & Yogyakarta, K. (2025). Literasi informasi berbasis kecerdasan buatan: Relevansi peran pustakawan dalam era digital. Jurnal Dialektika Informatika (Detika), 5(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.24176/DETIKA.V5I2.15367