Inventing the Reinvention? Tradition and the Body of Dancing Women

Yusti Dwi Nurwendah*  -  Postgraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

The practice of dance has historically been associated with complex social and political functions. There is abundant evidence demonstrating dance’s centrality in society, and it has become an integral part of the historical process. Concurrently, dance becomes an identity associated with women. In line with Hobsbawm’s concept of the invention of tradition. This study investigates the Jathilan Obyog tradition in Ponorogo through the lens of Hobsbawm’s notion of the invention of tradition, focusing on the dominant elite and the participation of Jathil women. The present study employs a qualitative approach, specifically utilizing ethnographic methodology. The data were collected through participant observation, interviews, and documentation that were tailored to the specific context and research objectives. The investigation employed the notion of the fabrication of tradition, initially introduced by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, as the focal point of exami­nation. The result shows that in a hegemonic endeavor that attempts to ‘discipline’ the tradition, Jathil women have succeeded in determining the power to reinvent tradition in picturesque ways, primarily through the body and with massive media support to create the process of reconstructing social memory and imagination. This research brings positive views of women as cultural agents within society.

Keywords: Jathilan; body; invention of tradition; women

  1. Adelita, Wasrinda Kanni. “Fenomena Peralihan Gender pada Penari Jathil dalam Kesenian Reog di Kabupaten Ponorogo.” [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Negeri Semarang, 2017.
  2. Ardiyana, Reni. “Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Penari Jathil Obyog di Desa Tugu, Kecamatan Mlarak, Kabupaten Ponorogo.” [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2016.
  3. Bharucha, Rustom. “Notes on the Invention of Tradition.” Economic and Political Weekly 24, no. 33 (1989): 1907–1909; 1911–1914.
  4. Birsyada, Muhammad Iqbal. “Legitimasi Kekuasaan atas Sejarah Keruntuhan Kerajaan Majapahit dalam Wacana Foucault.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 24, no. 2 (2016): 311–32. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.24.2.974.
  5. Boschung, Dietrich, Alexandra Wilhelmine Busch, and Miguel John Versluys, eds. Reinventing “The Invention of Tradition”? Indigenous Pasts and the Roman Present. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, 2015.
  6. Brooks, Lynn Matluck, ed. Women’s Work: Making Dance in Europe Before 1800. London, England: The Univerity of Wisconsin Press, 2007.
  7. DeWaal, Jeremy. “The Reinvention of Tradition: Form, Meaning, and Local Identity in Modern Cologne Carnival.” Central European History 46, no. 3 (2013): 495–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008938913000976.
  8. Firenzi, Tara. “The Changing Functions of Traditional Dance in Zulu Society: 1830–Present.” The International Journal of African Historical Studies 45, no. 3 (2012): 403–425.
  9. Foucault, Michel. Disiplin Tubuh Bengkel Individu Modern. Translated by Petrus Sunu Hardiyanta. Yogyakarta: LKiS, 1997.
  10. Foucault, Michel. Sejarah Seksualitas: Seks dan Kekuasaan. Translated by Rahayu S. Hidayat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1997.
  11. Gilman, Lisa. “The Traditionalization of Women’s Dancing, Hegemony, and Politics in Malawi.” Journal of Folklore Research 41, no. 1 (2004): 33–60.
  12. Hanna, Judith Lynne. Dance, Sex, and Gender: Signs of Identity, Dominance, Defiance, and Desire. London: The University of Chicago Press, 1988.
  13. Hefner, Robert W. “The Politics of Popular Art: Tayuban Dance and Culture Change in East Java.” Indonesia 43, no. 43 (1987): 75–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/3351211.
  14. Hefner, Robert W. “Islamizing Java? Religion and Politics in Rural East Java.” The Journal of Asian Studies 46, no. 3 (1987): 533–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2056898.
  15. Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger. The Invention of Tradition. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  16. Hughes-Freeland, Felicia. “Gender, Representation, Experience: The Case of Village Performers in Java.” Dance Research 26, no. 2 (2008): 140–67.
  17. ———. “Performers and Professionalization in Java: Between Leisure and Livelihood.” South East Asia Research 9, no. 2 (2001): 213–33. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000001101297388.
  18. Wikipedia Indonesia. “Kuda Lumping,” n.d. https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuda_lumping#:~:text=Kuda lumping adalah seni tari,sering disebut sebagai jaran kepang.
  19. Larasati, Rachmi Diyah. The Dance That Makes You Vanish: Cultural Reconstruction in Post-Genocide Indonesia. London: University of Minnesota Press, 2013.
  20. Lestari, Anis Mega Dwi. “Perkembangan Penari Jathil dari Laki-Laki menjadi Perempuan dalam Tari Reyog Ponorogo.” [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2018.
  21. Lestari, Siti Putri. “Hilangnya Jathil Laki-laki atau Gemblak dalam Kesenian Reog Ponorogo.” [Undergraduate Thesis]. UIN Satu Tulungagung, 2021.
  22. Lewis, James R, and Olav Hammer. The Invention of Sacred Tradition. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  23. Linnekin, Jocelyn. “Cultural Invention and the Dilemma of Authenticity.” American Anthropologist 93, no. 2 (1991): 446–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1991.93.2.02a00120.
  24. Lysloff, Rene T A. “Rural Javanese ‘Tradition’ and Erotic Subversion: Female Dance Performance in Banyumas (Central Java).” Asian Music 33, no. 1 (2001): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/834230.
  25. Meftahi, Ida. “The Invention of an Ideal Female National Dancer in Twentieth-Century Iran.” In Gender and Dance in Modern Iran. Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753294-2.
  26. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru. Translated by Tjetjep Rohendi and Mulyarto Mulyarto. Jakarta: UI Press, 1992.
  27. Moleong, Lexy J. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Bandung: Rosda Karya, 2010.
  28. Nurwendah, Yusti Dwi. “Tubuh Perempuan Penari dalam Jaring Patriarki (Studi atas Eksistensi Perempuan Penari Jathil Reog Obyog dalam Lanskap Masyarakat Muslim di Ponorogo).” [Master Thesis]. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2021.
  29. Nurwendah, Yusti Dwi dan Jepri Nugrawiyati. “Internalisasi Nilai Pendidikan Perdamaian melalui Pemahaman Perbedaan Peran Gender dalam Pertunjukan Kesenian Reog Ponorogo.” Palastren Jurnal Studi Gender 14, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.21043/palastren.v14i1.9925.
  30. Oberholtzer, Cath. “The Re-Invention of Tradition and the Marketing of Cultural Values.” Anthropologica 37, no. 2 (1995): 141–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/25605807.
  31. Palmisano, Stefania dan Nicola Pannofino. Invention of Tradition and Syncretism in Contemporary Religions: Sacred Creativity. Sydney, Australia: Palgrave Studies in New Religions and Alternative Spiritualities, 2017.
  32. Pemerintah Kabupaten Daerah Tingkat II Ponorogo. Pedoman Dasar Kesenian Reog Ponorogo dalam Pentas Budaya Bangsa. Ponorogo: Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Kabupaten Ponorogo, 1995.
  33. Pink, Sarah. Doing Sensory Ethnography. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2015.
  34. Plant, Byron King. “Secret, Powerful, and the Stuff of Legends: Revisiting Theories of Invented Tradition.” The Canadian Journal of Native Studies XXVIII, no. 1 (2008): 175–94.
  35. Post, Paul. “Rituals and the Function of the Past: Rereading Eric Hobsbawm.” Journal of Ritual Studies 10, no. 2 (1996): 85–107.
  36. Pratiwi, Danis Novita. “Makna Simbolik Bentuk Penyajian Tari Jathilan dalam Kesenian Reog.” [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Negeri Malang, 2012.
  37. Rapoport, Eva. “Jathilan Horse Dance: Spirit Possession Beliefs and Practices in The Present-Day Java.” IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 2, no. 1 (2018): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22146/ikat.v2i1.37389.
  38. Soedarsono, R. M. Seni Pertunjukan Indonesia di Era Globalisasi. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1999.
  39. Soemarto. Menelusuri Perjalanan Reyog Ponorogo. Ponorogo: CV Kotareogmedia, 2014.
  40. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.
  41. Sunardi, Christina. “Pushing at the Boundaries of the Body: Cultural Politics and Cross-Gender Dance in East Java.” Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 165, no. 4 (2009): 459–92. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003629.
  42. Suprapto. Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ilmu-ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Jakarta: Buku Seru, 2013.
  43. Sutton, R. Anderson. “The Crystallization of a Marginal Tradition: Music in Banyumas, West Central Java.” Yearbook for Traditional Music 18 (1986): 115. https://doi.org/10.2307/768524.
  44. Toni Shapiro-Phim, and Rachmi Diyah Larasati. “Reviewed Work: The Dance That Makes You Vanish: Cultural Reconstruction in Post-Genocide Indonesia by Rachmi Diyah Larasati.” Indonesia, no. 98 (2014): 163. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.98.0163.
  45. Wardani, Hertina Ayu Kusuma, Kasnadi Kasnadi, and Hestri Hurustyanti. “Citra Jathil dalam Kesenian Reog Obyog Ponorogo.” Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 7, no. 1 (2020): 24–31.
  46. Wilson, Ian Douglas. “Reog Ponorogo: Spirituality, Sexuality, and Power in a Javanese Performance Tradition.” Intersections: Gender and Sexuality in Asia and the Pacific, no. 2 (1999).
  47. Wirabrata, Reza Nayaka. “Memaparkan Makna Gerakan Tari Jathilan Tradisional Yogyakarta melalui Film Dokumenter ‘Prajurit Panji’ dengan Genre Ilmu Pengetahuan.” [Undergraduate Thesis]. Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2018.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Center for Gender and Child Studies (Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak)
LP2M, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang.
Central Java, Indonesia


Sawwa Visitor Statistics
 
apps