STUDENT – TEACHER INTERACTION: A CASE OF THE SECOND YEAR OF STATE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN CEPU


(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract The purposes of the study are to Dnd out the amount of lan- guage produced by the teacher (Teacher Talking Time) and by the students (Student Talking Time) and to identify the characteristics of the classroom interaction in the Senior High School English classes. The study involved the second year students and the English teachers of SMA N I Cepu and SMA N II Cepu as the object of the study. Observation method is utilized in the study to collect the data. The study is supported by one thousand four hundreds and forty data which are categorized into the ten categories of Flanders (FIAC). In details, the Drst result of the analysis shows that 70.5 % of the classroom available time was taken by the teacher and the stu- dents only took 21.6 % of the available time during the interaction in SMA N I Cepu. Meanwhile, during the interaction in SMA N II Cepu the teacher took 69.6 % of the classroom available time while the students only took 22.2 % of the available time. The second result shows that the dominant characteristic of the classroom interaction in SMA N I Cepu was Teacher Talking Time while the dominant characteristic in SMA N II Cepu was Con- tent Cross. Keywords : Classroom Interaction, Flanders Interaction Analyze Categories (FIAC), Teacher Talking Time, Student Talking Time, The Characteristics of Classroom Interaction
  1. REFERENCES
  2. Allwright, Dick and Kathleen M. Bailey.1994. Focus on the Language
  3. Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Chaudron, Craig.1993.Second Language Classroom – Research on Teaching and Learning.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Cormack. Ways of Approaching Research: Quantitative Designs. http://
  6. www.fortunecity.com/greenDeld/grizzly/432/rra2.htm.
  7. Ellis, Rod. 2003. Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
  8. Goh, Christine C.M and Rita Elaine Silver. 2004. Language Acquisition and Development. Singapore: Longman.
  9. Hall, Joan Kelly. 2002. Teaching and Researching Language and Culture.
  10. Edinburgh Gate Harlow – England: Pearson Education Lim- ited.
  11. Johnson, Keith and H. Johnson. 1998/1999. Encyclopedic dict of Ap- plied Linguistic. UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Oxford.
  12. Nunan, David. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. O Neill, Robert. Teacher – Talk in the Laguage Class. http: //www. btinternet. com/+ted.power/esl0420.html.
  14. Thuraisingam, Pamela. Language Use and Interaction in the History Class- room. http:// www.aare.edu.au/01pap/thu01057.htm.
  15. Wragg, E.c. 1994. An Introduction to Classroom Observation. London and New York: Routledge.
  16. Ylane, Lindblom. What Makes a Student Group Success]ul? Student – Stu- dent and Student – Teacher Interaction in a Problem – Based Learning Environment. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/ leri/2003/00000006/00000001/05119454?crawler-tru

Open Access Copyright (c) 2014 Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by

    

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Publisher
English Education Department,
Faculty of Education and Teacher Training,
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof Hamka Ngaliyan Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

apps