THE LESS-INTERRESTED OF ISLAMIC BANK FOR ISSUING SUKUK: Factors and Recommendations

Taufik Awaludin*  -  School of Business Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia
Irfan Syauqi Beik  -  School of Business Bogor Agricultural University, Indonesia
Rifki Ismal  -  School of Islamic Economics Tazkia, Jakarta, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/ws.24.1.693

This study attempts to identify dominant factors for banks to issue sukuk and emission features. Applying interviews and Analytic Network Process, this paper Found that the sub-elements which are dominant in influencing IB less interested in issuing sukuk, namely: averse selection/amount cost of fund (management), investment rating companies (investor), the results of using sukuk funds (regulation) and profitability condition (finance). Meanwhile, the sub-elements which are dominant in determining the features of the issuance of sukuk are: macroeconomic condition (emission values), expectations of investors (return)), the contract and the structure of sukuk (collateral), managing mismatch (period), and company liquidity (payment term).  The method used in this reseach is the Analytic Network Process (ANP). This study will identify the aspects of emission factors and features.

 

Keywords: sukuk; Islamic banks; issuing; factor; ANP

  1. Abdo A., “A Critical Review of the Sukuk Market: A Qualitative Study to Identify Current Risks and Opportunities”, [dissertation], Dublin: Dublin Business School, 2014.
  2. Ascarya, Yumanita D., “The Development of Islamic Financial System in Indonesia and the Way Forward”, Working Paper No. WP/10/04, 2010.
  3. Ascarya, “The persistence of low profit and loss sharing financing in islamic banking: “the case of Indonesia”. Review of Indonesian Economic and Business Studies, Vol. 1, 2011.
  4. Awaludin F, Masih M. , “Sukuk Pricing Dynamics -Factors Influencing Yield Curve of the Malaysian Sukuk”, MPRA Paper, No. 66355, 2015, pp. 1-23.
  5. Baitenova N, Zamanbekov D. , “Opportunities Related to Securitization and Sukuk Structure of Shariah Compliant Securitization”, Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, 2013, pp. 862-868.
  6. Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan[BAPEPAM-LK], Peraturan No. IX. A. 13 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbitan Efek Syari’ah, Jakarta: BAPEPAM-LK, 2009.
  7. Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan[BAPEPAM-LK], “Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Emiten di Pasar Modal”, Laporan Kajian Minat Emiten. Jakarta: BAPEPAM-LK , 2009.
  8. Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan[BAPEPAM-LK], Per¬aturan No. IX. A. 14 Tahun 2012 tentang Akad-akad yang digunakan dalam Penerbitan Efek Syari’ah di Pasar Modal, Jakarta: BAPEPAM-LK, 2012.
  9. Dewi N. , “Mengurai Masalah Pengembangan Sukuk Korporasi di Indonesia Menggunakan Analytic Network Process”, Jurnal Islamic Finance & Business Review. Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011, pp. 138-167.
  10. Diaw A, Bacha OI, Lahsasna A. , “Incentive-compatible Sukuk Musharakah for Private Sector Funding’, International Journal of Islamic Finance. Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013. , pp. 39-80.
  11. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Investasi untuk Reksa Dana Syari’ah, Jakarta: DSN MUI, . 2001.
  12. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Obligasi Syari’ah, Jakarta: DSN MUI, 2002.
  13. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 33 Tahun 2002 tentang Obligasi Syari’ah Mudharabah. Jakarta: DSN MUI, 2002.
  14. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 40 Tahun 2003 tentang Pasar Modal dan Pedoman Umum Penerapan Prinsip Syari’ah di Bidang Pasar Modal. Jakarta: DSN MUI, 2003.
  15. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Obligasi Syari’ah Ijarah, Jakarta: DSN MUI, 2004.
  16. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 59 Tahun 2007 tentang Obligasi Syari’ah Mudharabah Konversi, Jakarta: DSN MUI, 2007.
  17. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 71 Tahun 2008 tentang Sale and Lease Back, Jakarta: DSN MUI, 2008.
  18. Dewan Syari’ah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia [DSN MUI], Fatwa No. 80 Tahun 2011 tentang Penerapan Prinsip Syari’ah dalam Mekanisme Perdagangan Efek Bersifat Ekuitas di Pasar Reguler Bursa Efek, Jakarta: DSN MUI, 2011.
  19. Elshazly MR, Tripathy P. , “Sukuk Structures, Profiles and Risks”, Paper of Columbia College, 2013, pp. 1-18.
  20. Jobst A, Kunzel P, Mills PS, Amadou SY. , “Islamic Bond Issuance -What Sovereign Debt Managers Need to Know”, International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. Vol. 1 No. 4, 2008. , pp. 330-344 .
  21. Nagano M. 2010. “Islamic Finance and the Theory of Capital Structure”, MPRA Paper. No. 24567, pp. 1-17.
  22. Oh I, Lee JD, Hwang S, Heshmati A. , Analysis of product efficiency in the Korean automobile market from a consumer’s perspective. Empirical Economics, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2009. , pp. 119-137.
  23. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 15 tahun 2015 tentang penerapan prinsip syari’ah di pasar modal, Jakarta: OJK, 2015.
  24. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 16 tahun 2015 tentang ahli syari’ah pasar modal, Jakarta: OJK, 2015.
  25. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 18 tahun 2015 tentang Penerbitan dan Persyaratan Sukuk, Jakarta: OJK, 2015.
  26. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Laporan Publikasi Statistik Pasar Modal Syari’ah, Jakarta: OJK, 2015.
  27. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), Laporan Publikasi Statistik Perbankan Syari’ah, Jakarta: OJK, 2015.
  28. Paltrinieri A, Dreassi A, Miani S, Sclip A. , “In Search of Zero Beta Assets: Evidence from the Sukuk Market”, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic and Management Engineering. Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015. , pp. 67-75.
  29. Rezaei Z. , “Sukuk: an Islamic Financial Instrument”, Management and Administrative Sciences Review, Vol. 2. No. 3, 2013, pp. 261-267.
  30. Saaty TL, Vargas LG. , Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2013. .
  31. Saaty TL., Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Makingwith Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications, 2005.
  32. Saeed A, Salah O. , “Development of Sukuk: Pragmatic and Idealist Approaches to Sukuk Structures”, Journal of International Banking Law and Regulation, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2013. , pp. 41-52.
  33. Said A, Grassa R. , The Determinants of Sukuk Market Development: Does Macroeconomic Factors Influence the Construction of Certain Stucture of Sukuk?” Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2013, pp. 251-267.
  34. Said A., “Does the Use of Sukuk (Islamic Bonds) Impact Islamic Banks Performances? A Case Study of Relative Performance during 2007-2009”, Middle Eastern Finance and Economics, Vol. 12, 2011, pp. 65-76.
  35. Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. , Research Methods For Business Students. , 5-th ed. , England: Pearson Education Limited, 2009. .
  36. Sekaran U. , “Research Method for Business: a Skill Building Approach”, Journal of Education for Business. , Vol. 68, No. 5, 2003, pp. 316-317.
  37. Shahar HBK, Ibrahim Y, Mohd KMT. , “Firms’ Issuing Choice between Islamic and Conventional Debt: Does Corporate Governance Structure Matter?” 9-th Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia, , 2014 Oktober 17-19-th; Kuala Terengganu: Universiti Utara Malaysia.
  38. Shaikh SA. , “Financing Public Infrastructure Using Sovereign Sukuk”, Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2015, pp. 11-22.
  39. Siswantoro D. , “Analysis of the first ijarah sukuk default in Indonesia: how could it be?” International Journal of Islamic Banking & Finance, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2013. , pp. 1-15.
  40. Tariq AA, Dar H. , “Risks of Sukuk Structures: Implication for Resource Mobilization”, Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 49, No. 2, 2007, pp. 203-223
  41. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No. 19 Tahun 2008 tentang Surat Berharga Syari’ah Negara.
  42. Undang-undang Republik Indonesia No. 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syari’ah.
  43. Usmani MT. , “Sukuk and Their Contemporary Applications”, paper in AAOIFI Shari’a Council Meeting, Saudi Arabia , 2007.
  44. Wahid NA. Memahami dan Membedah Obligasi pada Perbankan Syari’ah. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2010.
  45. Zaheer S, Wijnbergen SV. , “Sukuk Defaults: on Distress Resolution in Islamic Finance’, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. No. 13-087/VI/ DSF57, 2013. , pp. 1-51.
  46. Zakaria NB, Isa MAM, Abidin RAZ. , Sukuk rating, default risk and earnings response coefficient. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2013, pp. 131-137.
  47. Zin MZM, Sakat AA, Ahmad NA, Nor MRM, Bhari A, Ishak S, Jamain MS. , The Effectiveness of Sukuk in Islamic Finance Market”, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 12, 2011, pp. 472-478.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2016 Taufik Awaludin, Irfan Syauqi Beik, Rifki Ismal
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LP2M)
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Rectorate Building, 3rd Floor
Jl. Prof. Hamka - Kampus 3, Tambakaji Ngaliyan 50185, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
Email: walisongo@walisongo.ac.id

 

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License 

View My Stats

 

apps