Dispute Resolution Model for Granting Hareuta Peunulang through the Customary Court in Pidie Regency, Aceh Province

Aufa Miranti  -  Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Teuku Muttaqin Mansur*    -  (Scopus ID: 57222336690) Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Sulaiman Sulaiman  -  Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Faridah Jalil  -  (Scopus ID: 48761308900) Universiti Kembangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

(*) Corresponding Author

Hareuta peunulang is a grant of immovable property from parents to their daughters before marriage in Pidie Regency, Aceh Province. Disputes are resolved through customary court, but the settlement that should have been settled at the mukim level was brought to the Mahkamah Shar'iyyah. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the causes of the hareuta peunulang practice disputes and find an effective and efficient model for resolving them through customary courts. Empirical juridical methods were used with data collected data through observation and interviews and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. The results showed that disputes are caused by the lack of deliberation in the hareuta peunulang process. The social plurality of laws makes the dispute resolution model through customary courts ineffective and inefficient. Therefore, the role of the village head (keuchick) and head of mukim (imuem mukim) is needed to educate the community regarding customary justice procedures that should to conducted at the village (gampong) and mukim levels.

Keywords: hareuta peunulang; dispute resolution; customary court

  1. Afriana, Anita. “Mediasi in Court untuk Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum Berdasarkan Win-Win Solution.” Jurnal Akta Yudisia 2, no. 2 (August 13, 2017). https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V2I2.1548.
  2. Airi Safrijal. Hukum Adat dalam Perspektif Hukum Nasional. Banda Aceh: FH UNMUHA Press, 2016.
  3. Daud, Mohd. Kalam, and Rahmatul Akbar. “Hareuta Peunulang: Protection of Women in Aceh According to Customary and Islamic Law.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 4, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 259. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.5921.
  4. Fadillah, Firda Ainun, and Saskia Amalia Putri. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Arbitrase (Literature Review Etika).” JIMT: Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan 2, no. 6 (July 21, 2021): 744–56. https://doi.org/10.31933/JIMT.V2I6.486.
  5. Ilyas, Ilyas. “Analisis Penyelesaian Hareuta Peunulang Menurut Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam di Kota Banda Aceh.” Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 18, no. 1 (2016): 93–107. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/kanun/article/view/5920/4874.
  6. Iqbal, Muhammad, Azhari Yahya, and Husni Kamal. “Pola Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Rumah Tangga Melalui Peradilan Adat Gampong di Aceh.” Jurnal Geuthèë: Penelitian Multidisiplin 3, no. 1 (March 30, 2020): 383–92. https://doi.org/10.52626/JG.V3I1.72.
  7. Ismail, Badruzzaman. Peradilan Adat sebagai Peradilan Alternatif dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia: Peradilan Adat Aceh. Banda Aceh: Majelis Adat Aceh, 2015.
  8. Juwita Tarochi Boboy, Budi Santoso, and Irawati. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Melalui Mediasi Berdasarkan Teori Dean G. Pruitt dan Jeffrey Z. Rubin.” Notarius 13, no. 2 (2020): 803–18. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31168.
  9. Lulu Munirah dan Teuku Muttaqin Mansur. “Pelaksanaan Hareuta Peunulang Menurut Tinjauan Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Kabupaten Pidie, Aceh, Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa: Bidang Hukum Keperdataan 1, no. 1 (2017): 118–25. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/perdata/article/view/8600/3610.
  10. M. Roem Syibly, Sidik Tono, and Amir Mu’allim. “Reinterpretation to Balance in Inheritance Distributation on Bilateral Kinship in Aceh.” Insla E-Proceedings 3, no. 1 (2020): 706–16. https://insla.usim.edu.my/index.php/eproceeding/article/view/64.
  11. Muhammad, Abdul Kadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
  12. Munadi Usman. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam terhadap Praktik Hibah Hareuta Peunulang di Aceh.” Al-Hukama 10, no. 1 (July 2020): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2020.10.1.1-19.
  13. Nanda Amalia, Mukhlis, and Yusrizal. “Model Penyelesaian Sengketa dan Peradilan Adat di Aceh.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 1 (2018): 159–79. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art8.
  14. Sulaiman Tripa. Peradilan Gampong. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2019.
  15. ———. Rekontruksi Pemerintahan Gampong. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2019.
  16. Susanti Adi Nugroho. Manfaat Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.
  17. Teuku Muttaqin Mansur. Hukum Adat Perkembangan dan Pembaruannya. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press, 2018.
  18. Teuku Muttaqin Mansur, Sulaiman, and Hasbi Ali. “Adat Court in Aceh, Indonesia: A Review of Law.” Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun 8, no. 2 (2020): 423–42. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v8i2.443.
  19. Usman, A. Rani. Sejarah Peradaban Aceh: Suatu Analisis Interaksionis, Integrasi dan Konflik. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2003.
  20. Zaitun Muzana, Zahri Hamat, and Faisal Husen Ismail. “Pemberian Hareuta Peunulang di Aceh: Analisis Terhadap Pengurusan Hareuta Peunulang.” Advances in Humanities and Contemporary Studies 1, no. 1 (2020): 47–54. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/ahcs/article/view/436/167.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Al-Ahkam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher
Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
in collaboration with Indonesian Consortium Sharia Scholar (KSSI)
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: 024 7601291
https://fsh.walisongo.ac.id/
email: alahkam@walisongo.ac.id

 Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View:  Visitor | Country  

 
apps