Securities Issuance Considerations As an External Funding Source for Sharia Commercial Banks

Ida Syafrida*  -  Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Indianik Aminah  -  Politeknik Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
Taufik Awaludin  -  Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/economica.2020.11.2.4787

Abstract: This research is to formulate dominant aspects and sub-aspects of benefits, opportunities, costs, risks for the Issuance of Sukuk and shares as an external funding source for Sharia Banks (IBs). The fundamental problem is related to the less optimal role of Islamic banking in the national economy because the market share is 5.94% (early 2019). It is necessary to increase external funding sources through the Issuance of Sukuk and shares. There were 3 IBs share issuers: BPDS, BRIS, BTPNS, and 4 IBs Sukuk issuers: BMI, BSM, BNIS, BRIS. The method uses Analytic Network Process to identify dominant aspects and sub-aspects that IBs consider to issue Sukuk and shares. The primary data from in-depth interviews with each 5 Sukuk and share issuer expert practitioners of  IBs Treasury and Corporate Planning. The consideration of  IBs is much influenced by the benefit and opportunity aspects. Dominant sub-aspects of  IBs considerations in Sukuk issuance: sources of funds for capital and business expansion (benefit aspects), oversubscribed investor demand (opportunity aspects), cost of capital (cost aspects), sharia compliance risks (risk aspects). Dominant sub-aspects of public share issuance: increasing capital (benefit aspect), broad investor base (opportunity aspect), underwriter costs (cost aspect), information disclosure demands (risk aspect).

Abstrak: Penelitian ini untuk merumuskan aspek dan sub-aspek dominan dari manfaat, peluang, biaya, dan risiko (BOCR) atas penerbitan sukuk dan saham publik sebagai sumber pendanaan eksternal Bank Umum Syariah (BUS). Dasar masalah terkait belum optimalnya peran perbankan syariah dalam perekonomian nasional karena pangsa pasar yang baru mencapai 5,94% dari total perbankan nasional (awal tahun 2019).  Ini disebabkan minimnya permodalan dan skala industri serta individual BUS, sehingga perlu peningkatan sumber pendanaan eksternal melalui penerbitan sukuk dan saham publik. Di awal 2019 terdapat 3 BUS emiten saham: BPDS, BRIS, BTPNS dan 4 BUS emiten sukuk: BMI, BSM, BNIS, BRIS. Metode analisis data menggunakan Analytic Network Process untuk mengidentifikasi aspek dan sub-aspek dominan yang menjadi pertimbangan BUS menerbitkan sukuk dan saham publik. Data utama hasil wawancara terhadap masing-masing 5 praktisi ahli Treassury dan Corporate Planning BUS emiten saham dan emiten sukuk. Pertimbangan BUS dominan dipengaruhi aspek manfaat kemudian aspek peluang.  Sub-aspek dominan pertimbangan BUS dalam penerbitan sukuk yaitu: sumber dana ekspansi usaha dan permodalan (aspek manfaat), permintaan investor berlebih (aspek peluang), biaya modal (aspek biaya), risiko kepatuhan syariah (aspek risiko). Sub-aspek dominan penerbitan saham publik yaitu: meningkatkan permodalan (aspek manfaat), luasnya basis investor (aspek peluang), biaya penjamin emisi (aspek biaya), tuntutan keterbukaan informasi (aspek risiko). 

Keywords: Islamic Bank; BOCR; Shares; Sukuk

  1. AAOIFI. 2015. Accounting, Auditing and Governance Standards. Edited by AAOIFI. December 2. Manama, Bahrain: Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions.
  2. Abdo, Alaa. 2014. “A Critical Review of the Sukuk Market A Qualitative Study to Identify Current Risks and Opportunities.” Dissertaion Submitted in Part Fulfilment of the Degree of Master in Business Administration,Dublin Business School, 1–145. https://esource.dbs.ie/handle/10788/1792.
  3. Akbarullah, Muhammad Handriyo. 2011. “Dampak Penerbitan Sukuk Terhadap Kinerja Bank Syariah (Studi Kasus PT Bank Syariah Mandiri).” Depok: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia. http://lib.ui.ac.id.
  4. Alsaeed, Khalid, Sulaiman. 2012. “Sukuk Issuance in Saudi Arabia: Recent Trends and Positive Expectations.”
  5. Armadiyanti, Putri. 2013. “Peluang Dan Tantangan Perkembangan Obligasi Syariah (Sukuk) Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Akuntansi AKUNESA 2 (1).
  6. Asker, John, Joan Farre-Mensa, and Alexander Ljungqvist. 2015. “Corporate Investment and Stock Market Listing: A Puzzle?” Review of Financial Studies 28 (2): 342–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu077.
  7. Awaludin, Taufik, Irfan Syauqi Beik, and Rifki Ismal. 2016. “The Less-Interrested of Islamic Bank for Issuing Sukuk.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan 24 (1): 37. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.24.1.693.
  8. Becchetti, Leonardo, and Giovanni Trovato. 2002. “The Determinants of Growth for Small and Medium Sized Firms. The Role of the Availability of External Finance.” Small Business Economics 19 (4): 291–306. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40229240.
  9. Benninga, Simon, Mark Helmantel, and Oded Sarig. 2005. “The Timing of Initial Public Offerings.” Journal of Financial Economics 75 (1): 115–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.04.002.
  10. Berggren, Björn, Christer Olofsson, and Lars Silver. 2000. “Control Aversion and the Search for External Financing in Swedish SMEs.” Small Business Economics 15 (3): 233–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008153428618.
  11. Bildik, Recep, and Mustafa Kemal Yilmaz. 2006. “The Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings in the Istanbul Stock Exchange.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 49–76. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.952526.
  12. Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia. 2003. Fatwa Nomor: 40/DSN-MUI/X/2003. Pasar Modal Dan Pedoman Umum Penerapan Prinsip Syariah Di Bidang Pasar Modal. Indonesia.
  13. Diaw, Abdou, Obiyathulla Ismath Bacha, and Ahcene Lahsasna. 2012. “Incentive-Compatible Ṣukūk Mushārakah for Private Sector Funding.” ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance 4 (1): 39–80. https://doi.org/10.12816/0002736.
  14. DinarStandard. 2020. “State of the Global Islamic Economy Report 2020/21,” 2020.
  15. Fatwandari, Reny Julianie. 2010. “Analisis Pengaruh Penerbitan Obligasi Dan Penawaran Umum Terbatas Terhadap Penilaian Camels PT Bank XYZ, Tbk.” Depok: Universitas Indonesia. http://lib.ui.ac.id/detail.jsp?id=136249.
  16. García-Pérez-de-Lema, D, A Duréndez, and T Mariño. 2011. “A Strategic Decision for Growth, Financing and Survival of Small and Medium Family Businesses: Going Public in an Alternative Stock Market (MAB).” Economics and Finance Review 1 (8): 31–42.
  17. Jiwandaru, Burhanuddin, and Muhammad Rizal Taufiqurrahman. 2014. “Analisis Komparatif Biaya Hutang Sukuk Dan Obligasi Perusahaan.” Tazkia Islamic Finance and Business Review 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.30993/tifbr.v5i2.43.
  18. Kim, Woojin, and Michael S. Weisbach. 2008. “Motivations for Public Equity Offers: An International Perspective.” Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.09.010.
  19. Lee, Yoon-Jun, and Jeong-Dong Lee. 2008. “Strategy of Start-Ups for IPO Timing across High Technology Industries.” Applied Economics Letters 15 (11): 869–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600820650.
  20. Manopo, Widy Fimber. 2013. “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Struktur Modal Perbankan Yang Go Public Di Bei Tahun 2008-2010.” Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi 1 (3): 653–63. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.1.3.2013.1872.
  21. Nanaeva, Zhamal, and Rauf N Mammadov. 2010. “Thoughts on Sukuk and the Risk of Default.” Islamic Finance News, 2010. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329786438_Thoughts_on_Sukuk_and_the_Risk_of_Default.
  22. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. 2020a. “Laporan Publikasi Roadmap Perbankan Syariah 2020-2025.” Jakarta.
  23. ———. 2020b. “Laporan Publikasi Statistik Perbankan Syariah.” Jakarta.
  24. Pham, Peter K., Petko S. Kalev, and Adam B. Steen. 2003. “Underpricing, Stock Allocation, Ownership Structure and Post-Listing Liquidity of Newly Listed Firms.” Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (5): 919–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00241-8.
  25. Poulsen, Annette B., and Mike Stegemoller. 2008. “Moving from Private to Public Ownership: Selling Out to Public Firms versus Initial Public Offerings.” Financial Management 37 (1): 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2008.00005.x.
  26. Pribadi, Sukma Kukuh, and Buddi Wibowo. 2019. “The Analysis of Company Decisions in Choosing Sukuk and Bonds Using Logit Model.” Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 10 (1): 141–64. https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2019.10.1.3211.
  27. Puspita, Gita Cahya, and Rohmawati Kusumaningtias. 2010. “Pengaruh Struktur Aktiva, Profitabilitas, Kebijakan Dividen Terhadap Struktur Modal Pada Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Pada Tahun 2005-2009.” AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi 2 (1): 76. https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v2n1.p76-91.
  28. Republik Indonesia. 1995. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 8 Tahun 1995 Tentang Pasar Modal.
  29. Saaty, Thomas L., and Luis G. Vargas. 2013. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. Vol. 195. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. Boston, MA: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7.
  30. Saeed, A., and O. Salah. 2014. “Development of Sukuk : Pragmatic and Idealist Approaches to Sukuk Structures 1.”
  31. Sapulete, Archie Marlon, and Adler Haymans Manurung. 2012. “Pengaruh Penerbitan Obligasi Subordinasi Dan Rasio Keuangan Terhadap Profitabilitas Bank,” no. November: 1–24. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264554124_Pengaruh_Penerbitan_Obligasi_Subordinasi_dan_Rasio_Keuangan_terhadap_Profitabilitas_Bank.
  32. Saunders, M, P Lewis, and A Thornhill. 2009. Research Methods for Business Students. Always Learning. Prentice Hall.
  33. Septiana, Tian. 2010. “Dampak Penerbitan Obligasi Subordinasi Terhadap Struktur Modal PT. Bank DKI.” Universitas Indonesia. https://library.ui.ac.id/detail?id=136487&lokasi=lokal.
  34. Shazly, Mona R. El, and Pragya Tripathy. 2013. “Sukuk Structures , Profiles and Risks.” Isfin, 1–18. https://www.isfin.net/sites/isfin.com/files/sukuk_structures_profiles_and_risks.pdf.
  35. Sulong, Z, N A C Embi, and M R Ariffin. 2017. “Performance of Initial Public Offerings: Does Shariah Compliance Extensiveness Make A Difference?” International Journal of Accounting 2 (6): 190–205.
  36. Susyanti, Jeni. 2008. “Profitabilitas, Pertumbuhan Aktiva, Ukuran Perusahaan, Struktur Aktiva, Dan Likuiditas Terhadap Struktur Modal PT Bank Syari’ah ‘X’ Tbk.” IQTISHODUNA 4 (3). https://doi.org/10.18860/iq.v0i0.268.
  37. Syafrida, I., and I. Aminah. 2015. “Faktor Perlambatan Pertumbuhan Bank Syariah Di Indonesia Dan Upaya Penanganannya.” Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis PNJ 14 (1): 13473. https://doi.org/10.32722/eb.Vol14.No.1.2015.pp.
  38. United Nation Conference on Trade and Development. 2020. “World Investment Report 2020.” Jenewa (SW).
  39. Wahid, Nazaruddin Abdul. 2010. Sukuk : Memahami & Membedah Obligasi Pada Perbankan Syariah. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
  40. Wicaksana, Moch. Zulfiqar Agung. 2014. “Peluang Dan Tantangan Obligasi Syariah Di Indonesia: Sebuah Tinjauan Konseptual.” Jurnal Akuntansi AKUNESA 2 (3). https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-akuntansi/article/view/6766/3511.
  41. Wies, Simone, and Christine Moorman. 2015. “Going Public: How Stock Market Listing Changes Firm Innovation Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 52 (5): 694–709. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0289.
  42. World Bank Group. 2020. “Overview of the Global Islamic Financial Services Industry.” In Global Islamic Finance Report 2020.
  43. Zin, Mohamad Zaid Mohd, Ahamad Asmadi Sakat, Nurfahiratul Azlina Ahmad, Mohd Roslan, Mohd Nor, Azri Bhari, Saurdi Ishak, and Mohd Sapawi Jamain. 2011. “The Effectiveness of Sukuk in Islamic Finance Market.” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 5 (12): 472–78.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam

Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Published by the Institute of Islamic Economic Research and Development (LP2EI), Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 858-7654-4666
Website: https://febi.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: economica@walisongo.ac.id

ISSN: 2085-9325 (Print)
ISSN: 2541-4666 (Online)
DOI: 10.21580/economica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here, and OAI Links here.

apps