REC Method in Comparison of Soundness Level of Islamic Bank in Indonesia and Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2021.12.2.9371Keywords:
Capital, Earning, Islamic Banking, Risk Profiles, RECAbstract
This study analyzed the health of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia by using the REC approach. Through the quantitative descriptive method, this study collected data from official websites such as Bank Indonesia, the Financial Service Authority, and Bank Negara Malaysia. To determine the sample, purposive sampling with convenience sampling was done on 12 Islamic Commercial Banks in Indonesia and Malaysia. The risk profile is represented by the FDR ratio. It indicates significant differences in the soundness level of Islamic banks in Indonesia and Malaysia. Earning approach is represented by the ROA suggesting no significant difference in the soundness level of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia. For the capital approach represented by the CAR ratio, the results show that there is no significant difference in the soundness of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia. Simultaneously, the REC approach proves that there is no significant difference in the soundness of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia.Downloads
References
Amir, M., & Rukmana. (2010). Bank Syariah, Teori, Kebijakan dan Studi Empiris di Indonesia. Erlangga.
Aziz, M. R. (2013). Islamic Banking and Finance in Malaysia. USIM Publisher.
Darmayanti, I. M. P. dan N. P. A. (2017). Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Metode RGEC Pada PT Bank Mandiri,Tbk. E-jurnal Manajemen Unud, 6(2), 948–974.
Fund, I. M. (1996). Bank Soundness and Macroeconomic Policy. In Bank Soundness and Macroeconomic Policy. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781557755995.071
Indonesia, I. B. (2016). Manajemen Kesehatan Bank Berbasis Risiko. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Iska, S. (2014). Sistem Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Fajar Media Press.
Kementerian Agama, R. I. (2020). Al-Qur’an dan Terjemah Online. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/index.php
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., A. L. Levy, D., & Kleis Nielsen, R. (2018). Reuters Institut Digital News Report 2018. 270. https://elearning.fh-hwz.ch/pluginfile.php/168264/mod_resource/content/0/Reures_Digital_News_Report_2018.pdf
Putri, Y. I. R., & Handayani, Y. I. (2016). Perbandingan Kinerja Perbankan Indonesia dan Thailand. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 414–424.
Riadi, K. S., Atmadja, A. W. T., & Wahyuni, M. A. (2016). Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC ( Risk Profile , Good Corporate Governance , Earnings , dan Capital ). E-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 6(3), 1–12.
Rozzani, N., & Rahman, R. (2013). Camels and Performance Evaluation of Banks in Malaysia: Conventional Versus Islamic. Journal of Islamic Finance and Business …, 2(1), 36–45. http://www.wbiaus.org/3. Nalilah.pdf
Santoso, T. B. (2014). Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Lain. Salemba Empat.
State of the Global Islamic Economy Report. (2019). State of the global islamic economy report: Driving the islamic economy revolution 4.0. Dubai International Financial Centre, 1–174. https://cdn.salaamgateway.com/special-coverage/sgie19-20/full-report.pdf
The Islamic Financial Services Industry (IFSI) Stability Report 2019. (2019). Stability Report 2019. In The edge markets. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/malaysias-islamic-banking-industry-will-achieve-40-market-share-2020-says-aibim
Wulandari, I. (2018). Perbandingan Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Menggunakan Metode Rgec Pada Lima Bank Yang Masuk Kategori Buku 4 Di Indonesia Periode 2016. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26486/jramb.v4i1.435
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
