Plastic Waste Management Education Through the Waste Management Unit (UPS) in Borobudur Village

Adhi Surya Perdana; Indah Riadi Putri; Fatwa Nurul Hakim; Rastono Rastono; Yuniyati Yuniyati; Sholikin Sholikin; Arina Waliyati

About Journal

Focus and Scope

Focus and Scope

Focus-Research Journal on Teacher Professional adalah untuk memberikan pemahaman yang lebih baik kepada pembaca tentang Pendidikan Guru profesional dari berbagai perspektif, yang mencakup penelitian kepustakaan dan studi lapangan, dan menyajikan perkembangan dengan referensi khusus untuk ranah kependidikan mulai dari perencanaan, pelaksanaan, hingga evaluasi pendidikan melalui publikasi artikel.

Scope-:

Pengembangan kurikulum pendidikan
Evaluasi pembelajaran
Evaluasi kinerja guru
Metodologi pembelajaran
Media pembelajaran
Manajemen pendidikan anak usia dini, pendidikan dasar, dan pendidikan menengah
Kebijakan dan kepemimpinan pendidikan
Pendidikan fiqh
Pendidikan aqidah ahlak
Pendidikan bahasa arab
Psikologi pendidikan
Teknologi pendidikan
Pendidikan inklusif dan atau multikultural
Pembelajaran kolaboratif & interaktif
Analisis strategi pembelajaran
Kebijakan dan kepemimpinan pendidikan
Pengembangan profesional guru
Multimedia pembelajaran
Pendidikan non formal

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethic

The Research Journal on Teacher Professional Development (RJTPD) is a peer-reviewed international journal by Faculty of Islamic Education and Teacher Training, Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia, available in print and online and published twice a year. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Walisongo State Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication. The publication of an article in this journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of Research Journal on Teacher Professional Development (RJTPD)takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and recognizes ethical and other responsibilities. The institution committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication decisions. The editor of the The Research Journal on Teacher Professional Development (RJTPD) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play. An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality. The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions. Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Promptness. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Confidentiality. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Standards of Objectivity. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Acknowledgement of Sources. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards. Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
Originality and Plagiarism. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Author can use Turnitin.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Acknowledgement of Sources. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship of the Paper. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works. When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Author Fee

The Research Journal on Teacher Professional Development (RJTPD) does not charges any submission or publication fees. No fees incurred for article processing: submission, neither reviewing the articles.

Published Nov 13, 2023

Download

PDF Untitled

Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Author Geography: Indonesia, Thailand, Nigeria

Adhi Surya Perdana

Universitas Tidar

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6609-3233

Indah Riadi Putri

Chamber of Commerce and Industry Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME), Magelang City, Indonesia

Fatwa Nurul Hakim

National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia

Rastono Rastono

Chamber of Commerce and Industry Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME), Magelang City, Indonesia

Yuniyati Yuniyati

Local Community Facilitator of Borobudur Village, Magelang Regency, Indonesia

Sholikin Sholikin

3R Waste Management (TPS 3R) site of SekarTanjung Windusari, Magelang District, Indonesia

Arina Waliyati

3R Waste Management (TPS 3R) site of Lohjinawi Borobudur, Magelang District, Indonesia

Abstract

The rapid increase in population and tourist visits can be the basis of an important issue of increasing waste volume as one of the causes of environmental problems, one of which will affect people's consumption patterns so that it has an impact on increasing the volume, type and characteristics of waste. The purpose of this study: how is the level of awareness of community function duties in waste management, how is the role, involvement, participation or participation of the community in supporting waste management, and how is the support or synergy of other stakeholders in waste management in Borobudur Magelang District. The research method used is quantitative ex-post facto in focus group discussion (FGD) activities by presenting 40 people (representatives of 21 hamlets in Borobudur Village). The results of the research on Borobudur Village area-based waste management, waste management policies and regulations, and inorganic waste management (plastic) obtained the results there is a significant difference in changes in insight, knowledge and understanding before and after FGD activities on plastic waste management into various creations. The conclusion is that the level of awareness, understanding, role, involvement and participation of community waste management institutions and the community positively support the wise management of plastic waste in the form of various creations

Author Biography

Adhi Surya Perdana, Universitas Tidar

Agribisnis, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Tidar

References

Andreeyan, R. (2014). Studi Tentang Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Di Kelurahan Sambutan Kecamatan Sambutan Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 2(4).
Arisona, R. D. (2018). Pengelolaan Sampah 3R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) Pada Pembelajaran Ips Untuk Menumbuhkan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan. 3 (1). 39–51.
Asteria, D., & Heruman, H. (2016). Bank Sampah Sebagai Alternatif Strategi Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat di Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, 23(1). 136-141.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Ed. 4. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Bachtiar, H., Hanafi, I., & Rozikin, M. (2015). Pengembangan Bank Sampah Sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah (Studi pada Koperasi Bank Sampah Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP). 3(1). Hal 128-133.
Birawida, A.B. (2021). Community Behavior in Garbage Processing in Spermonde Islands of The City of Makassar. Jurnal Nasional Ilmu Kesehatan (JNIK). 4 (1). 1-9
Cohen, J. M., & Uphoff, N. T. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: Seeking Clarity Through Specificity. World Development, 8(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(80)90011-X
Dermawan, Lahming, & S.Mandra, M. A. (2018). Kajian Strategi Pengelolaan Sampah. UNM Environmental Journals. 1(3). 86-90
Firdausi, N. J., Adriansyah, A. A. & Khafid, M., 2018. Pemanfaatan Jerami dalam Pembuatan Kompos di Desa Balongtani Kecamatan Jabon, Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Community Development Journal. 2(2). 380-389.
Ghozali, I. (2008). Desain Penelitian Eksperimental. Semarang. Universitas Diponegoro
Ghozali, I. (2021). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 26 Edisi 10. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Kastaman R., & Moetangad A. K. 2007. Teknologi Pengolahan Daur Ulang Sampah Sistem pengelolaan Reaktor Sampah Terpadu. Bandung : Humaniora.
Soetrisno, L. 1995. Menuju Masyarakat Partisipatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Firmansyah, M.I. Agustus (2016). Studi Deskriptif Tentang Sinergitas Kewenangan Antara Bpjs Kesehatan dengan Organisasi Profesi dalam Penyediaan Layanan Kesehatan di Kota Surabaya, Jurnal Universitas Airlangga. 4 (2). 146 – 156.
Najiyati, S & Susilo, S.R.T. (2011). Sinergitas Instansi Pemerintah dalam Pembangunan Kota Terpadu Mandiri. Jurnal Ketrasmigrasian. 28 (2). 113-124
Nasikhin, N., Ikhrom, I., & Sutiyono, A. (2022). Sekolah online di masa pandemi COVID-19, bagaimana tanggapan guru dan siswa sekolah dasar?. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 7(1), 47-59.
Pratama, G. (2020). Upaya Modernisasi dan Inovasi Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat di Desa Leuwimunding Majalengka. Etos: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 37-49.
Restuningdiah, N., Nagari, P. M., & Jati, F. D. (2021). Literasi Bank Sampah dan Asuransi Sampah sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Inovasi Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat. 4(1). 144-152
Safiah, S. N., & Julipriyanto, W. (2017). Manfaat Bank Sampah Bagi Masyarakat Di Dusun Semali Desa Salamkanci Kecamatan Bandongan Kabupaten Magelang. (Studi Bank Sampah Semali Berseri). Jurnal REP (Riset Ekonomi Pembangunan), 2(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.31002/rep.v2i3.528
Saputri, M.M., Hanafi, I., & Ulum, M.C. (2015). Evaluasi Dampak Kebijakan Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Melalui Program Bank Sampah (Studi di Bank Sampah Sumber Rejeki Kelurahan Bandar Lor Kec. Mojoroto Kota Kediri). Jurnal Administrasi Publik. 3(11). 1804-1808
Sari, P. P., & Benno, R. (2011). Identification of Factors That Influence Public Trust Level on Waste Segregation. Jurnal Teknik Lingkungan. 18(2). 189–200.
Sila Dharma I. G. B. Et al. 2013. Model Pengangkutan Sampah Kota Bangli. Jurnal Spektran. 1 (2). 24-29
Soetomo. (2008). Masalah Sosial dan Upaya Pemecahannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Sucipto, D.C. 2012. Teknologi Pengolahan Daur Ulang Sampah. Yogyakarta : Gosyen Publishing
Sulistiyorini, N.R., Darwis, R.S., & Gutama, A. S. (2015). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Di Lingkungan Margaluyu Kelurahan Cicurug. Sosial Work Jurnal. 5(1).
Sumantri, A. (2010). Kesehatan Lingkungan dan Perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Kencana.
Suryani, A.S. (2014). Peran Bank Sampah Dalam Efektifitas Pengelolaan Sampah (Studi Kasus Bank Sampah Malang). Jurnal Masalah Sosial. 5(1). 71-80
Syafrudin, (2004). Model Pengelolaan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat (Kajian Awal Untuk Kasus Kota Semarang), Makalah pada Diskusi Interaktif: Pengelolaan Sampah Perkotaan Secara Terpadu, Program Magister Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Syari, W. (2021). Penyuluhan Penerapan Gaya Hidup Minim Sampah di Desa. PROMOTOR (Jurnal Mahasiswa Kesehatan Masyarakat). 4(1). 36–39.
Wardhani, M.K., & Harto, A.D. 2018. Studi Komparasi Pengurangan Timbulan Sampah Berbasis Masyarakat Menggunakan Prinsip Bank Sampah di Surabaya. Gresik dan Sidoarjo. Jurnal Pamator. 11(1). 52–63.
Wati, S. 2013. “The Implementation of Partnership Program In Gresik Regency Based 0n Governance Perspective (Case Study in PT Petrokimia Gresik)”. Jurnal Administrasi Publik. 1 (5). 1016-1024
Yulianti. (2012). Analisis Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Nasional Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (PNPM) Mandiri Perkotaan di Kota Solok. Universitas Andalas.