An Analysis of Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge in Genetic Engineering Topic among STEM Students: Basis for Instructional Material Development
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the levels of procedural and conceptual knowledge in genetic engineering topics among STEM students to provide baseline in developing effective instructional materials. Topics such as introduction to Genetic engineering, Gene Cloning, and DNA extraction were utilized to determine levels of students’types of knowledge, procedural and Conceptual. A descriptive quantitative research approach using 12-item test is used to analyze and assess both procedural and conceptual knowledge using a 5-point Likert scale was used to measure students’ understanding. A total of 12 STEM students from Concepcion National High School took part in the study during the 2023-2024 academic year. The findings of the study revealed that students demonstrated higher levels of proficiency in procedural knowledge compared to conceptual knowledge across the three topics: genetic engineering, gene cloning, and DNA extraction. There appears to be a range of understanding levels when it comes to procedural knowledge, as indicated by the higher variability. On the other hand, the lower variability in DNA extraction suggests a more consistent level of comprehension. The study's small sample size limited the use of inferential statistical methods, highlighting the importance of finding more effective teaching methods to improve students' comprehension of genetic engineering concepts. Qualitative data uncovered notable obstacles, including a dearth of interactive experiences and materials, underscoring the importance of active involvement and sufficient resources. Suggestions involve improving laboratory sessions, ensuring the availability of required materials, and implementing interactive teaching techniques to enhance students' understanding of genetic engineering. This study highlights the significance of well-rounded educational interventions to enhance both theoretical and practical knowledge in genetic engineering.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Altunoğlu, B. D., & Şeker, M. (2015, April 1). The Understandings of Genetics Concepts and Learning Approach of Pre-Service Science Teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n1s1p61
Benjamin & Main (2022, January 17). Cognitive Load Theory: A teacher's guide. Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/cognitive-load-theory-a-teachers-guide
Baumard, P. (1999). From tacit to explicit, the conjectural pattern of knowing. In P. Baumard (Ed.), Tacit knowledge in organization (pp. 52-77). London: Sage Publication.
Byukusenge, C., Nsanganwimana, F., & Paulo Tarmo, A. (2022, January 4). Difficult topics in the revised biology curriculum for advanced level secondary schools in Rwanda: teachers’ perceptions of causes and remedies. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 1112–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2012225
Charlesworth, R. (2015, January 19). Math and Science for Young Children. Cengage Learning. http://books.google.ie/books?id=mBSdBQAAQBAJ&dq=Charlesworth,+R.,+2012.+Experiences+in+math+for+young+children.+Belmont,+CA:+Wadsworth+Cengage+Learning.&hl=&cd=2&source=gbs_api
Choden, T., & Kijkuakul, S. (2020). Blending Problem Based Learning with Scientific Argumentation to Enhance Students’ Understanding of Basic Genetics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13129a
Desimone, L.M., T.M. Smith, S.A. Hayes and D. Frisvold, 2005. Beyond accountability and average mathematics scores: Relating state education policy attributes to cognitive achievement domains. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(4): 5-18.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00019.x.
Dudlicek, L.L., Gettig, E.A., Etzel, K.R., & Hart, T.C. (2004). Status of genetics education in U.S. dental schools. Journal of Dental Education, 68(8):809-818.
Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. (2017, November 1). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.6
Geary, D.C., 2004. Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1): 4-15.
Hiebert, J. and P. Lefevre, 1986. Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp: 1-27.
Hiebert, J., J.W. Stigler, J.K. Jacobs, K.B. Givvin, H. Garnier, M. Smith, H. Hollingsworth, A. Manaster, D. Wearne and R. Gallimore, 2005. Mathematics teaching in the United States today (and tomorrow): Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2): 111-132.Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027002111.
Jiamu, C. (2001). The great irnportance of the distinction between declarative and procedural knowledge. Análise Psicológica, 19(4), 559-566. doi: 10.14417/ap.362.
Jazuli, A., P. Setyosari and K.D. Sulthon, 2017. Improving conceptual understanding and problem-solving in mathematics through a contextual learning strategy. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1): 49-53. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323111425_Improving_conceptual_understanding_and_problem-solving_in_mathematics_through_a_contextual_learning_strategy
Mutawah, M. A. A., Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: High School Graduates Work Analysis and Standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273
NIH. (2010). The new genetics. U.S.A: Office of Communications and Public Liaison. National Institute of General Medical Sciences.National Institutes of Health.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Osman, E., BouJaoude, S., & Hamdan, H. (2016, May 6). An Investigation of Lebanese G7-12 Students’ Misconceptions and Difficulties in Genetics and Their Genetics Literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(7), 1257–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9743-9
Rittle-Johnson, B. and M.W. Alibali, 1999. Conceptual and procedural knowledge of Mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1): 175-189.Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175.
Sahdra, B., & Thagard, P. (2003). Procedural knowledge in molecular biology. Philosophical Psychology. 16(4), 477-498.
Sanders, M., & Makotsa, D. (2016). The possible influence of curriculum statements and textbooks on misconceptions: The case of evolution. Education as Change, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2015/555
Shirani Bidabadi, N., Nasr Isfahani, A., Rouhollahi, A., & Khalili, R. (2016). Effective teaching methods in higher education: Requirements and barriers. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 4(4):170-178.
Tekkaya, C., 2002. Misconceptions as barrier to understanding biology. Journal Science Education. 23: 259-266.
Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2013, March 26). Is Oklahoma really OK? A regional study of the prevalence of biological evolution-related misconceptions held by introductory biology teachers. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-6
Zulnaidi, H., & Zakaria, E. (2012, August 17). The Effect of Using GeoGebra on Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of High School Mathematics Students. Asian Social Science, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n11p102