Application of The Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model Using Interactive E-LKPD to Improve Students' Argumentation Skills

Main Article Content

Aldi Alfiansyah Wibowo
Evi Roviati
Novianti Muspiroh

Abstract

Most students are not skilled in writing scientific arguments, have not expressed opinions accompanied by relevant data, learning uses teacher-centered discussion methods but is still not optimal, and teachers have never applied learning to improve students' argumentation skills. So, an alternative for improving students' argumentation skills is to use the Argument Inquiry (ADI) model, a recommendation for a 21st-century skills inquiry learning model that can improve students' argumentation skills. This research aims to analyze student activities in implementing the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model using Interactive E-LKPD, to analyze the increase in argumentation skills in students who apply the ADI model using Interactive E-LKPD and students who do not apply the ADI model using E-LKPD Interactive, and to analyze how students respond after learning by implementing the ADI model assisted by Interactive E-LKPD. This research was carried out at Al-Azhar 5 Cirebon Islamic High School. With a class X population, the samples are classes X.3 and X.1. Research on student activities during 3 meetings showed that the experimental class obtained the highest average score in the double-blind peer review syntax. The students' lowest activity during the learning process was the syntax for revising peer review reports. There is a significant difference in the increase in students' argumentation skills for the better after implementing the ADI learning model compared to students who did not apply the ADI learning model. The response of students who applied the ADI model assisted by Interactive E-LKPD showed a positive response

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wibowo, A. A., Evi Roviati, & Novianti Muspiroh. (2024). Application of The Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model Using Interactive E-LKPD to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills. Bioeduca : Journal of Biology Education, 6(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.21580/bioeduca.v6i2.20691
Section
Articles

References

Afandi, A., Tenriawaru, A. B., & Anita, A. (2021). Konstruksi Perangkat Pembelajaran Menggunakan Model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) disertai Socioscientific Issues (SSI). Biologi Edukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 13(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.24815/jbe.v13i1.19920

Andriani, Y. (2016). Peningkatan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry Pada Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu Di SMP Kelas VII. EDUSAINS, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1578

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian. (Rev. ed). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Apriliyani, S. W., Mulyatna, D. F., & Artikel, S. (2021). Flipbook E-LKPD dengan Pendekatan Etnomatematika pada Materi Teorema Phytagoras Info Artikel Abstrak. Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, 491–500.

Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the effect of argument-driven inquiry in laboratory instruction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 15(1), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324

Desriyanti, R. (2016). Penerapan Problem Based Learning Pada Pembelajaran Konsep Hidrolisi Garam Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 1(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.15575/jta.v1i2.1236

Dianti, Pelegia. (2023). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa dengan Model Argument Driven Inquiry Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issue. Qalam: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan. 12(2). 1-14.

Diyan Prasinta, J., Kadaritna, N., Tania FKIP Universitas Lampung, L., & Soemantri Brojonegoro No, J. (2015). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran ADI dalam Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa berdasarkan Kemampuan Akademik. Jurnal Binomia, 1–15.

Erika, F., & Prahani, B. K. (2017). Innovative Chemistry Learning Model to Improve Argumentation Skills and Self-Efficacy. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSRJRME), 07(01), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0701026268

Fauzi, Asri. (2021). Penggunaan Situs Liveworksheets Untuk Mengembangkan Lkpd Interaktif Di Sekolah Dasar. Mitra Mahajana: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat. 2(3), 232-240.

Farida, Lulu’atul. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument driven Inquiry (ADI) Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. Journal of Physics and Science Learning. 2(2). 25-36.

Firtsanianta, Hanny. (2022). Efektivitas E-LKPD Berbantuan Liveworksheet Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. PROCEEDINGS Membangun Karakter dan Budaya Literasi Dalam Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas di SD. 140-149.

Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, Dr. (2015). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry Dalam Pembelajaran IPA untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559

Hurrahma, Mifta. (2022). Efektivitas E-LKPD Berbasis Liveworksheet dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Sosiologi Peserta Didik di Kelas XI IPS SMA N 5 Padang. Jurnal Sikola : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 2715–1735. https://doi.org/10.24036/nara.v1i3.193

Julianti, Nova. (2019). Implementation Of Peer Instruction Integrated Guided Inquiry Learning To Increase Argumentation Skill Of Science Junior High School Students. Jurnal Geliga Sains (JGS): Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2): 119-127.

Marhamah, O. S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Pencemaran Lingkungan Di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(02), 45. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v9i02.747

Nirmayani, Heny. (2022). Kegunaan Aplikasi Liveworksheet Sebagai LKPD Interaktif Bagi GuruGuru SD di Masa Pembelajaran Daring Pandemi Covid 19. EdukasI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar. Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 9-16

Nurpratiwi, R. T., Sriwanto, S., & Sarjanti, E. (2015). Peningkatan aktivitas dan prestasi belajar siswa melalui metode picture and picture dengan media audio visual pada mata pelajaran geografi di kelas XI IPS 2 SMA Negeri 1 Bantarkawung. Geo Edukasi, 4(2): 1-9.

Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Owens, M. C. (2012). The two faces of scientific argumentation: Applications to global climate change. Perspectives on Scientific Argumentation: Theory, Practice and Research, 9789400724709, 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2470-9_2

Prasetyo, A. D., & Abduh, M. (2021). Peningkatan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Discovery Learning di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 1717–1724. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i4.991

Rahmat, Nur. (2017). Pembentukan Karakter Disiplin Siswa Melalui Guru Kelas di SD Negeri 3 Rejosari Kabupaten Oku Timur. JMKSP : Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan. 2(2). 229-244.

Rizkia, Firda. (2022). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Pada Pembelajaran Biologi di SMA. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, FKIP UNMA. 225-232.

Roviati, Evi. (2019). Kontribusi Argumentasi Ilmiah dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis. Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, Vol. 11 No. 2, Halaman: 56–66

Sondang, R. (2012). Identifikasi keterampilan argumentasi melalui analisis “Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP)” pada topik kinematika bagi mahasiswa calon guru. Seminar Bidang Ilmu MIPA Universitas Negeri Medan, 11-12 Mei 2012.

Sudijono, Anas. (2008). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Wahyunan Widhi, M. T., Hakim, A. R., Wulansari, N. I., Solahuddin, M. I., & Admoko, S. (2021). Analisis Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Peserta Didik Pada Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) Dalam Memahami Konsep Fisika Dengan Metode Library Research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.79-91

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.