PENERAPAN CRITICAL REVIEW ARTIKEL PEMBELAJARAN IPA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA DALAM MENYUSUN PROPOSAL SKRIPSI

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Feb 23, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2014.4.1.127
Keywords:
critical review, scientific article, journal and thesis Proposal

Main Article Content

p parmin
Unnes

Abstract

The aims of this research is to improve students’ ability in develop- ing a proposal thesis by applying critical review of scientific articles come from journals. The research is designed by class action research. The results showed 63% of students thesis proposals on Research Methodology course scored above 80. Based on the results obtained it can be concluded that the application has been critical review or critical study of scientific articles can enhance students’ ability in preparing research proposals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
parmin, p. (2016). PENERAPAN CRITICAL REVIEW ARTIKEL PEMBELAJARAN IPA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA DALAM MENYUSUN PROPOSAL SKRIPSI. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 4(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2014.4.1.127
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Section
Articles
Authors retain copyright and grant the PHENOMENON right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially, Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in PHENOMENON.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in PHENOMENON.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

Heron, S.D., 1997. Problem Associated with Concept Analysis. Journal of Science Education. 6 (2) 185-199.

Heriawan Iwan, dkk. 2009. Panduan Kajian Kritis Program Bermutu. Kemendiknas: P4TK IPA Bandung.

Kabba E. Colley. 2009. Based Science Instruction: Teaching Science for Understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. (410-422).

Nugent, G; Kunz, G; Levy, R and David Harwood; Carlson, D. 2008. The Impact of a Field-Based, Inquiry-Focused Model of Instruction on Preservice Teachers’ Science Learning and At- titudes. Electronic Journal of Science Education. Vol. 12, No. 2.

Parmin dan Endah P. 2011. Pengembangan Modul Mata Kuliah Strategi Belajar Mengajar IPA Berbasis Hasil Penelitian Pem- belajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. Volume 1 (1), (43-56).

Suhartawan, B., dkk. 2004. Mengoptimalkan Pendekatan Keter- ampilan Proses IPA dalam Pembelajaran di Laboratorium. Ju- rnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. Vol. 2 No.2.

Susilo, H., Husnul C, dan Yuyun D. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Surabaya: Bayumedia Publishing.

Sopiah, dkk. 2009. Pembiasaan Bekerja Ilmiah pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. Volume 5 (20-27).

Saito, dkk. 2010. Case Study of Indonesian Mathematics and Science Teacher. Journal of In-service Education. 32 (2): (171-184).

Volante, L & Fazio, X. 2007. Exploring Teacher Candidates’ Assess- ment Literacy: Implications for Teacher Education Reform and Professional Development. Can. Jou. of Edu. 30, 3 : 749-770.

Widyatiningtyas, R. 2009. Pembentukan Pengetahuan Sains, Teknologi dan Masyarakat dalam Pandangan Pendidikan IPA. EDUCARE: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Budaya. http://educare.e- fkipunla.net. Diakses 12 Januari 2014.