Availability and Utilisation of Science Laboratory Facilities on Science Teacher-Trainees’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science

Nelson Mandela Anane*  -  C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Upper East Region, Ghana
Vincent Anum Ankamah-Lomotey  -  C. K. Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Upper East Region, Ghana

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/phen.2023.13.1.15340

Supp. File(s): CO-AUTHORSHIP

This study assessed final-year science teacher-trainee perceptions of the impact of the availability and utilization of laboratory facilities on science students' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in science at Accra and Ada Colleges of Education. This research was motivated by an initial study that stated that the majority of junior high school science teachers were unable to teach science effectively so it was easier for students to understand. This research used a quantitative approach with a cross-sectional descriptive survey design involving 62 intern teachers, 15 science tutors, and two school principals. The research instrument (tutor and teacher questionnaire) was declared suitable for use after a slight revision with the Validity and Reliability scores of 0.84 and 0.86. The research revealed that final-year science teacher candidates at the Accra College of Education were of the opinion that the availability and utilization of laboratory facilities had a moderate but neutral impact on PCK in science, in contrast to the results of research by science teachers at Ada College which stated that the availability and use of Laboratory facilities have a high and positive impact on PCK Science. It is recommended that science tutors engage science trainee teachers in efficient hands-on activities, and also focus on on-campus and off-campus practicums to develop the training of PCK science trainee teachers.

Keywords: Laboratory Facilities, Science Teacher-Trainees, Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK in Science, Impact of Availability and Utilisation

Studi ini menilai persepsi guru-peserta pelatihan sains tahun terakhir tentang dampak ketersediaan dan pemanfaatan fasilitas laboratorium terhadap pengetahuan konten pedagogis siswa sains (PCK) dalam sains di Accra dan Ada Colleges of Education. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penelitian awal yang menyatakan bahwa sebagian besar guru IPA SMP belum mampu mengajarkan IPA secara efektif sehingga lebih mudah dipahami oleh siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain survei deskriptif cross-sectional yang melibatkan 62 orang guru magang, 15 orang tutor IPA, dan dua orang kepala sekolah. Instrumen penelitian (angket tutor dan guru) dinyatakan layak digunakan setelah dilakukan sedikit revisi dengan skor Validitas dan Reliabilitas sebesar 0,84 dan 0,86. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa calon guru IPA tingkat akhir di Accra College of Education berpendapat bahwa ketersediaan dan pemanfaatan fasilitas laboratorium berdampak sedang namun netral terhadap PCK bidang IPA, berbeda dengan hasil penelitian guru IPA di Ada College yang menyatakan bahwa ketersediaan dan pemanfaatan fasilitas Laboratorium memberikan dampak yang tinggi dan positif terhadap PCK Sains. Disarankan agar tutor sains melibatkan guru peserta pelatihan sains dalam kegiatan praktik langsung yang efisien, dan juga fokus pada praktik di dalam kampus dan di luar kampus untuk mengembangkan pelatihan guru peserta pelatihan sains PCK.

Supplement Files

Keywords: Fasilitas Laboratorium;Guru-Pelatih IPA;Pengetahuan Konten Pedagogis (PCK dalam IPA, Dampak Ketersediaan dan Pemanfaatannya)

  1. Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2013). Lack of interest in school science among non-science students at the senior high school level. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 53(53),7-21. DOI:10.33225/pec/13.53.07
  2. Anyanwu, R.I., and Alafiatayo, B.M. (2015). Biology teachers’ attitudes towards production and utilization of instructional materials in secondary schools in Kaduna State Nigeria. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education, 3(4), 49-59.
  3. Bailey, J., Blakeney-Williams, M., Carss, W., Edwards, F., Hawera, N., & Taylor, M. (2011). Grappling with the complexity of the New Zealand curriculum: Next steps in exploring the NZC in the initial teacher education. Waikato Journal of Education, 16(3), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v16i3.40.
  4. Ball, D.L, H.C Hill, and H Bass. (2005). “Knowing Mathematics for Teaching. Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough to Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide?” American Educator 30 (3): 14–46.
  5. Ball, D.L, M.H Thames, and G Phelps. 2008. “Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special?” Journal of Teacher Education 59 (5): 389–407. doi:10.1177/0022487108324554
  6. Buabeng, I., Owusu, K.A. & Ntow, F.D. (2014). TIMSS 2011 science assessment results: A review of Ghana’s performance. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching.3(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v3n2pl
  7. Cheng, E.C. (2014). “Learning Study: Nurturing the Instructional Design and Teaching Competency of Pre-service Teachers.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 42 (1): 51–66. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2013.869546.
  8. Davies, P, and R Dunhill. (2008). “Learning Study’ as a Model for Collaborative Practice in Initial Teacher Education.” Journal for Education for Teaching 34 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1080/02607470701773408.
  9. Enderle, P.J. & Leeanne, R.R. (2016). Students’ Lab Manual for Argument-Driven Inquiry in Chemistry. International Journal of Education and Research. Vol.8 No. 5 May 2020. Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/article/The-Fight -for-Classroom/19431
  10. Farenga, S., & Joyce, B.A. (2010). Science-related attitudes and science course selection: A study of high-ability boys and girls. In: S.J. Farenga, & B.A. Joyce, Roeper Review (pp.37-41). London: Routledge.
  11. Hiebert, J, A.K Morris, D Berk, and A Jansen. (2007). “Preparing Teachers to Learn from Teaching.” Journal of Teacher Education 58 (47): 47–61. doi:10.1177/0022487106295726.
  12. Holmqvist, M. (2011). “Teachers’ Learning in a Learning Study.” Instructional Science 39 (4): 497–511. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9138-1.
  13. Kibirige, I., & Tsamago, H. (2013). Learners’ Performance in Physical Sciences Using Laboratory Investigations. Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(4): 425-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2013.11890104
  14. Ko, P.Y. (2012). “Critical Conditions for Pre-service Teachers’ Learning through Inquiry. The Learning Study Approach in Hong Kong.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 1 (1): 49–64. DOI:10.1108/20468251211179704
  15. Lai, M.Y, and Y.W.P Lo-Fu. (2013). “Incorporating Learning Study in a Teacher Education Program in Hong Kong: A Case Study.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 2 (1): 72–89. doi:10.1108/20468251311290141.
  16. Lamb, P, and P.Y Ko . (2016). “Case Studies of Lesson and Learning Study in Initial Teacher Education Programmes.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 5 (2): 78–83. doi:10.1108/IJLLS-02-2016-0005.
  17. Leavy, A.M, and M Hourigan. (2016). “Using Lesson Study to Support Knowledge Development in Intial Teacher Education: Insights from Early Number Classrooms.” Teaching and Teacher Education 57: 161–175. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.002.
  18. Leavy, A.M, and M Hourigan. (2018). “Using Lesson Study to Support the Teaching of Early Number Concepts: Examining the Development of Prospective Teachers’ Specialized Content Knowledge.” Early Childhood Education Journal 46 (1): 47–60. doi:10.1007/s10643-016-0834-6.
  19. Lee, M.Y. (2019). “The Development of Elementary Pre-service Teachers’ Professional Noticing of Students’ Thinking through Adapted Lesson Study.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 47 (4): 383–398. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2019.1607253
  20. Lewis, C, R Perry, and S Friedkin. (2009). “Lesson Study as Action Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S Noffke, and B Somekh, 142-154. Los Angeles: Sage.
  21. Mårtensson, P. (2019). “Learning to See Distinctions through Learning Studies: Critical Aspects as an Example of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 8 (3): 196–211. doi:10.1108/IJLLS-10-2018-0069.
  22. Nilsson, P. (2014). “When Teaching Makes a Difference:developing Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge through Learning Study.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (11): 1794–1814. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.879621.
  23. Nwagbo, E.O., and Uzoma, A.B. (2014). Effects of practical activities on secondary school students’ process skills acquisition in Abuja Municipal Council. Nigeria.
  24. Olufuke, B.T. (2012). Effect of availability and utilization of physics laboratory equipment on students’ academic achievement in senior secondary school physics. World journal of education,2(5) 1-7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1158947.pdf
  25. Oluwasegun, G., Ohwofosirai, A., & Emagbetere, J. (2014). The impact of physics laboratory on students’ offering physics in Ethiope West local Government Area of Delta State. Journal of Educational Research and Review. 10(7) 961-956. DOI:10.5897/ERR2014.1943
  26. Pang, M.F, and U Runesson Kempe. (2019). “The Learning Study: Recent Trends and Developments.” International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies 8 (3): 162–169. doi:10.1108/IJLLS-07-2019-093
  27. Royea, D.A, and C Nicol. (2019). “Pre-service Teachers’ Experiences of Learning Study: Learning with and Using Variation Theory.” Educational Action Research 27 (4): 564–580. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1515094.
  28. Shulman, L.S. (1987). “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  29. Tan, Y.S.M, J.J Amiel, and C Cheng. (2020). “Theorizing Variation Theory - a Case of Collaborative Action Research Involving Science Teacher Candidates.” Educational Action Research 28 (3): 443–461. doi:10.1080/09650792.2019.1575257.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Walisongo Semarang
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 815-7502-8676
Website: https://fst.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: phenomenon@walisongo.ac.id


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

apps