The Effectiveness of the Support to Development of the Islamic Higher Education Project in Improving the Quality of Education

Authors

  • Rahman El Junusi Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Central Java
  • Musahadi Musahadi Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Central Java
  • Ferry Khusnul Mubarrok Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Central Java

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v15i1.11659

Keywords:

effectiveness, Islamic higher education, quality education, development Project

Abstract

This study aims to explore the Support to Development of the Islamic Higher Education Project (SDIHE) in an effort to improve the quality of Islamic Religious Higher Educations (PTKIs). This research is a policy research conducted at UIN Sumatera Utara, UIN Raden Fatah, UIN Walisongo and UIN Mataram. It employs exploratory descriptive analysis which explains the SDIHE phenomenon. The results show that SDIHE which is run by PTKIs (UIN Sumatera Utara, UIN Raden Fatah, UIN Walisongo and UIN Mataram) through curriculum development and expert training programs is effective in improving the quality of PTKIs. SDIHE has an impact on increasing the ranking of these universities globally and locally. This shows an increase in the performance of PTKIs. There has been no research on the effectiveness and impact of projects from foreign grants in Higher Education that comprehensively discusses quality from the perspective of curriculum development and expert training programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aca-ac, F. S., Baes, I. S. M., Balbuena, G., Cañon, D. G., Justiniani, P. P., Laoagan, I. J., & Tan, T. A. (2020). Defining Quality Higher Education in an Emerging Economy : A Case of Cebu , Philippines. The Normal Lights, 14(1), 1–24.

Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6

Belout, A. (1998). Effects of human resource management on project effectiveness and success: Toward a new conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 16(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00011-2

Bullock, R. K. (2006). THEORY OF EFFECTIVENESS MEASUREMENT. Air University Air.

Cooke-Davies, T. J., Crawford, L. H., & Lechler, T. G. (2009). Project Management Systems: Moving Project Management From an Operational to a Strategic Discipline. Project Management Journal, 40(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj

Crawford, P., & Bryce, P. (2003). Project monitoring and evaluation: A method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 21(5), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00060-1

de Wit, A. (1988). Measurement of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 6(3), 164–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(88)90043-9

Elken, M., & Stensaker, B. (2018). Conceptualising ‘quality work’ in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 24(3), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2018.1554782

Frølich, N., Huisman, J., Slipersæter, S., Stensaker, B., & Bótas, P. C. P. (2013). A reinterpretation of institutional transformations in European higher education: Strategising pluralistic organisations in multiplex environments. Higher Education, 65(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9582-8

Hazelkorn, E. (2018). Reshaping the world order of higher education: the role and impact of rankings on national and global systems. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2018.1424562

Hyväri, I. (2006). Project management effectiveness in project-oriented business organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 24(3), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.09.001

Marginson, S. (2014). University rankings and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12061

Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2019). Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for Higher Education Institutions’ sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.076

Patanakul, P., & Milosevic, D. (2009). The effectiveness in managing a group of multiple projects: Factors of influence and measurement criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.001

Pinto, J. K., & Prescott, J. E. (1988). Variations in Critical Success Factors Over the Stages in the Project Life Cycle. Journal of Management, 14(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638801400102

Radujković, M., & Sjekavica, M. (2017). Project Management Success Factors. In Procedia Engineering (Vol. 196, pp. 607–615). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.048

Sidorenko, T., & Gorbatova, T. (2015). Efficiency of Russian Education Through the Scale of World University Rankings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 464–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.555

Susanti, N. (2017). KERJASAMA INDONESIA DENGAN ISLAMIC DELOPMENT BANK (IDB) DALAM PROGRAM MEMBER COUNTRIES PARTNERSHIP STRATEGY (MCPS) 2011-2014. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau, 4(2), 1–15.

Torres. et.all. (2018). Analysis of Patterns in the University World Rankings Webometrics, Shanghai, QS and SIR-SCimago: Case Latin America. In Analysis of Patterns in the University World Rankings (Issue June, pp. 188–199). © Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93803-5

van Vught, F. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.5

Downloads

Published

2023-07-25

Issue

Section

Articles