Four-Tier Test Based On Local Wisdom to Analyze Misconceptions in Rotational Dynamics

Qisthi Fariyani*    -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Ziyana Walida Prama  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Joko Budi Poernomo  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/at.v14i2.13394
This R&D research resulted in a four-tier diagnostic test instrument based on local wisdom. The purpose of the study was to describe the instrument's characteristics, test the validity, reliability, and characteristics of the items developed, and describe the misconception profile of the students of MA Islamiyyah Attanwir Talun. The development method uses the Borg & Gall model with sample selection through purposive sampling. Data collection techniques include tests, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. The test instrument was made by correlating physics material and the local wisdom of the community. The validity test results by the expert stated that the instrument developed was valid. The reliability of the developed instrument is 0.978. The test instrument consisted of 15 moderate and 13 difficult questions; with differentiating power, 12 items were corrected, seven were accepted but had to be corrected, and nine were accepted without improvement. There were 50% misconceptions about the answer, 57.14% about the reason, and 50% about the answer and reason. The highest misconception occurs in the concept of applying the moment of inertia, with a percentage of 67.23%. The lowest misconception is found in the concept of rigid body equilibrium, with a percentage of 38.98%.

Keywords: Four-tier test, Diagnostic test; Local wisdom test; Misconception instrument

  1. Alfiani. (2015). Analisis Profil Miskonsepsi Dan Konsistensi Konsepsi Siswa SMA pada Topik Suhu dan Kalor. Seminar Nasional Fisika, IV, 29–32. http://snf-unj.ac.id/kumpulan-prosiding/snf2015/
  2. Anggraeni, T. E., & Mundilarto, M. (2020). The Development of Local Wisdom-Based Physics Cognitive Ability Assessment Instrument for Senior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.5718
  3. Aprilianingrum, F., Jamzuri, & Supurwoko. (2015). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Sma Kelasxi Pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi Dan Kesetimbangan Benda Tegar Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Seminar Nasional Fisika Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 318–323.
  4. Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian; Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.
  5. Arini, F. Z. R., Susilaningsih, E., & Dewi, N. K. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Proses untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Sains dan Aktivitas Siswa SMP. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(2), 170–178.
  6. Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions about Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667–1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618
  7. Bunawan, W., Setiawan, A., Rusli, A., & . N. (2015). Penilaian Pemahaman Representasi Grafik Materi Optika Geometri Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v2i2.4830
  8. Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2010). Do students know What they know and what they don’t know? Using a four-tier diagnostic test to assess the nature of students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science Education, 40(3), 313–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9122-4
  9. Demirci, N. (2005). a Study About Students’ Misconceptions in Force and Motion Concepts By Incorporating a Web-Assisted Physics Program. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET July, 4(3), 1303–6521.
  10. Depdiknas. (2007). Tes Diagnostik.
  11. Fadllan, A., Prawira, W. Y., Arsini, & Hartono. (2019). Analysis of students’ misconceptions on mechanics using three-tier diagnostic test and clinical interview. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1170(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012027
  12. Faraoni, V. (2007). A common misconception about LIGO detectors of gravitational waves. General Relativity and Gravitation, 39(5), 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0415-5
  13. Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. (2015). Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2), 41–49.
  14. Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. (2017). Four-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Misconceptions in Geometrical Optics. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(3), 1724–1729.
  15. Fitrianingrum, A. M., Sarwi, & Astuti, B. (2017). Penerapan Instrumen Three-Tier Test untuk Mengidentifikasi Siswa SMA pada Materi Keseimbangan Benda Tegar. Jurnal Phenomenon, 07(2), 88–98.
  16. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research 7th Edition. Pearson Education, Inc.
  17. Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a
  18. Hafizah, D., & Haris, V. (2014). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Melalui Tes Multiple Choice Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika Man 1 Bukittinggi. Edusainstika Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 1(1), 100–1003. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2006.15.2.209
  19. Haris, V. (2013). Identifikasi miskonsepsi materi mekanika dengan menggunakan cri ( certainty of response index ). Jurnal Ta’dib, 16(137), 77–86.
  20. Hartini, S., Firdausi, S., Misbah, & Sulaeman, N. F. (2018). The development of physics teaching materials based on local wisdom to train Saraba Kawa characters. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14249
  21. Jafer, Y. J. (2020). Assessing Kuwaiti Pre-service Science Teachers’ Greenhouse Effect Perceptions and Misconceptions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 657–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09992-1
  22. Kaltakci, D., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Identifying Pre- Service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions with Three-Tier Tests. Secondary Science/Math Education, 1–8.
  23. Kaur, G. (2013). A review of selected literature on causative agents and identification strategies of students’ misconceptions. Journal of Educationia Confab, 2(11), 79–94.
  24. Kemendikbud. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.
  25. Kiray, S. A., & Simsek, S. (2021). Determination and Evaluation of the Science Teacher Candidates’ Misconceptions About Density by Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10087-5
  26. Köse, S. (2008). Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283–293. papers3://publication/uuid/758267A6-5EC4-48F5-AA77-C623E2E11B46
  27. Kruit, P., Oostdam, R., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. (2020). Performance Assessment as a Diagnostic Tool for Science Teachers. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1093–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9724-9
  28. Maharani, L., Rahayu, D. I., Amaliah, E., Rahayu, R., & Saregar, A. (2019). Diagnostic Test with Four-Tier in Physics Learning: Case of Misconception in Newton’s Law Material. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012022
  29. McClary, L. M., & Bretz, S. L. (2012). Development and assessment of a diagnostic tool to identify organic chemistry students’ alternative conceptions related to acid strength. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2317–2341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.684433
  30. Moodley, K., & Gaigher, E. (2019). Teaching Electric Circuits: Teachers’ Perceptions and Learners’ Misconceptions. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9615-5
  31. Morales López, A. I., & Tuzón Marco, P. (2021). Misconceptions, Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards the Phenomenon of Radioactivity. Science and Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00251-w
  32. Mutlu, A., & Sesen, B. A. (2015). Development of a two- tier diagnostic test to assess undergraduates ’ understanding of some chemistry concepts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.593
  33. Nimah, Z., Sudarmanto, A., & Fariyani, Q. (2021). Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test Characterized by Local Wisdom Values for Analyzing Critical Thinking Skills. 4(1), 97–110.
  34. Pesman, H. (2005). Development of a three-tier test to assess ninth grade students’ misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi DErgisi, September, 113–120.
  35. Prinz, A., Kollmer, J., Flick, L., Renkl, A., & Eitel, A. (2021). Refuting student teachers’ misconceptions about multimedia learning. Instructional Science, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09568-z
  36. Pujayanto, Budiharti, R., Radiyono, Y., Rizky, N., Nuraini, A., Putri, H. V., Saputro, D. E., & Adhitama, E. (2018). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Miskonsepsi Empat Tahap tentang Kinematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 237–249.
  37. Puthiaparampil, T., & Rahman, M. (2021). How important is distractor efficiency for grading Best Answer Questions? BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02463-0
  38. Ramadhan, R. H., Ratnaningtyas, L., Kuswanto, H., & Wardani, R. (2019). Analysis of Physics Aspects of Local Wisdom: Long Bumbung (Bamboo Cannon) in Media Development for Android-Based Physics Comics in Sound Wave Chapter. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1397(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012016
  39. Rusilowati, A. (2006). Profil kesulitan belajar fisika pokok bahasan kelistrikan siswa SMA di kota Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 4(2), 100–106. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPFI/article/view/163/168
  40. Shidiq, A. S., Masykuri, M., & Hayus, E. S. Van. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Two-Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Pada Materi Kelarutan Dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan Untuk Siswa Sma/Ma Kelas Xi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 3(4), 83–92. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/kimia/article/view/4507
  41. Styer, D. F. (2005). Common misconceptions regarding quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 64(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18288
  42. Suparno, P. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Grasindo. http://ir.obihiro.ac.jp/dspace/handle/10322/3933
  43. Tayubi, Y. R. (2005). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Pada Konsep-Konsep Fisika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal UPI, 24(3), 4–9.
  44. Uwamahoro, J., Ndihokubwayo, K., Ralph, M., & Ndayambaje, I. (2021). Physics Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Geometric Optics: Revisited Analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09913-4
  45. Wahidah S., S. N., Kusairi, S., & Zulaikah, S. (2018). Diagnosis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMA di Kota Malang pada Konsep Suhu dan Kalor Menggunakan Three Tier Test. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(3), 95. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i3.295
  46. Winrich, C., & Garik, P. (2021). Integrating History of Science in In‑service Physics Teacher Education: Impact on Teachers’ Practice. In Science and Education (Vol. 30, Issue 5). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00219-w
  47. Yuberti, Y., Suryani, Y., & Kurniawati, I. (2020). Four-Tier Diagnostic Test with Certainty of Response Index to Identify Misconception in Physics. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v3i2.6061

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 At-Taqaddum
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
At-Taqaddum
Published by Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Walisongo No.3-5 Semarang 50185, Indonesia
Phone: +62 857-1999-1679
Website: https://lpm.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: attaqaddum@walisongo.ac.id 
 
ISSN: 1979-4703 (p)
ISSN: 2527-9726 (e)
DOI : 10.21580/at

Lisensi Creative Commons
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 
apps