ANALISIS PENGARUH AKREDITASI PROGRAM STUDI TERHADAP INTENSITAS BELAJAR DAN HARAPAN MASA DEPAN (Studi Kasus di Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Walisongo Semarang)

Eva Khoirun Nisa*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
The quality of a study program is assessed from the results of accreditation. Accreditation is also one of the requirements in applying for a job in a public or private institution. The hope is that the results of university accreditation will be satisfactory when students graduate from the college. With the Friedman test statistic, it can be seen the effect of the study program accreditation in the Faculty of Science and Technology on the learning intensity and future expectations in this study. It turned out that descriptively, the A study program's accreditation motivated students to study diligently and students really hoped to get a job or reputable college for further studies. In contrast, the students from study programs are accredited B, and C have medium and low learning intensity. Their hopes of getting a good job or place of further study are almost ordinary or almost nonexistent.

Keywords: study program accreditation; learning intensity; future expectation; Friedman test

  1. Beaumont, Yvonne. “An Analysis of High School Students’ Performance on Five Integrated Science Process Skills”. Research in Science & Technical Education. Vol. 19 No.2 (1998):133-145
  2. Alan Carr. Positive Psychology, The Science of Happiness and Human Strength. New York: Brunner-Routledge. 2004
  3. Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi. Pedoman Akademik Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi. Semarang: Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Walisongo. 2015
  4. Hansen, Joe B. “Student Performance and Student Growth as Measure of Success: A Evaluator’s Perspective”. Paper presented at annual meeting American Educational Research Association. Lousiana. 2000
  5. Indarto, Wusono. Analisis Karya Tulis (Skripsi) Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Periode 2008/2009 dan 2009/2010. Jurnal EduChild. Vol. 1, No.1 (2012)
  6. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa. 2008
  7. Kraska, M., & Miller. Nonparametric Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. New York: CRC Press. 2014
  8. Koestoro, Budi dan Basrowi. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kediri:Jenggala Pustaka Utama. 2006
  9. Mulyo. Manajemen Administrasi dan Organisasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta : Ar-Ruzz Media. 2008
  10. Nurmi, J-E. “Planning, Motivation And Evaluation In Orientation To The Future: A Latent Structure Analysis”. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. Vol. 30 (1989): 64-71.
  11. Peraturan Pemerintah No.11 Tahun 2017
  12. Permenristekdikti Nomor 32 Tahun 2016
  13. Prasetyo, Hendrawan. “Dampak Kebijakan Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi Terhadap daya Saing (Competitiveness) Perguruan Tinggi Swasta di Kabupaten Kebumen”. Jurnal Fokus Bisnis. Vo. 13 No.01 (2014): 1-12
  14. Sardiman. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. 2011
  15. Sarwono, Jonathan. Statistik Multivariat Aplikasi Untuk Riset Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. 2013
  16. Sugihartono, dkk. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press. 2007
  17. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2010
  18. Suharsimi, Arikunto. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2005
  19. SK BAN-PT No. 5128/SK/BAN-PT/Akred/S/XII/2017
  20. Sukardi. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Kepelatihan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. 2014

Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 At-Taqaddum
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
At-Taqaddum
Published by Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Walisongo No.3-5 Semarang 50185, Indonesia
Phone: +62 857-1999-1679
Website: https://lpm.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: attaqaddum@walisongo.ac.id 
 
 
apps