Is the Implementation of Risk Management Just a Formality? Evidence from a Public Sector Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v15i2.16458Keywords:
Risk Management, Public Sector, EffectivenessAbstract
This study aims to describe the implementation of risk management and explore the perceptions of risk owners about its impact. This research was conducted at the Ministry of Public Works and Housing, especially in the service unit for procuring goods and construction services, considering the large budget and the number of auction packages. The research was designed as qualitative research with a case study approach. Data collection uses in-depth interviews to explore phenomena related to implementing risk management in these public sector organizations—data analysis using the Interactive Data Model. The research results show that implementing risk management is not only seen as a mere formality but as a necessity for the organization. In these public sector organizations, the effectiveness in implementing risk management is, on average, in the defined category, which means it is effective in creating and protecting organizational value. Although risk management is still carried out partially, the overall risk management system has begun to be structured and realized. On the other hand, there are still obstacles in risk management infrastructure, such as the unavailability of a risk management information system, limited understanding of risk management, and the absence of a specific budget related to risk management. In overcoming this problem, the solutions offered are to build a risk management information system, conduct education and training, and allocate a specific budget for risk management.Downloads
References
Ahmeti, R., Kosovo, R. B., & Vladi, B. (2017). Risk Management in Public Sector : A Literature Review. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8385(August), 190–196.
Alnoor, B. (2009). Risk management , corporate governance and management accounting : Emerging interdependencies. Management Accounting Research, 20, 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.11.002
Antonius, Alijoyo dan Munawar, Y. (2019). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Maturitas Manajemen Risiko Organisasi Di Indonesia. BINA Ekonomi, 23(1), 67–79.
Bracci, E., Gobbo, G., & Papi, L. (2022). The integration of risk and performance management : the role of boundary objects. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(1), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2020-0024
Bracci, E., Tallaki, M., Gobbo, G., & Papi, L. (2021). Risk management in the public sector : a structured literature review. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 34(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2020-0049
Brian, Ballou dan L, H. (2005). A Building-Block Approach for Implementing COSO ’ s Enterprise Risk Management-Integrated Framework. Management Accounting Quarterly, 6(2), 1–10.
Corvellec, H. (2009). The practice of risk management : Silence is not absence. Risk Management, 11(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1057/rm.2009.12
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Durst, S., Hinteregger, C., & Zieba, M. (2019). The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 105(November 2018), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.002
Fraser, J. R. S., & Simkins, B. J. (2016). The challenges of and solutions for implementing enterprise risk management. Business Horizons, 59(6), 689–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.06.007
Gjerdrum, B. D., & Peter, M. (2011). Risk Management The New International Standard on the Practice of Risk. Risk Management, 21, 8–12.
Graycar, A. (2019). Mapping corruption in procurement. Journal of Financial Crime, 1(6), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2018-0063
Hashimov, E. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis : A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
Jauhari, R., Sukmadilaga, C., & Mulyani, S. (2021). Implementasi dan critical success factor manajemen risiko di instansi Pemerintah. Jurnal Paradigma Ekonomika, 16(2), 285–298.
Karyani, Etikah, Setio Anggoro, Dewo, Wimboh Santoso, Budi, F. (2020). Risk governance and bank profitability in ASEAN-5 : a comparative and empirical study governance. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(5), 949–969. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2018-0132
Matthew B. Miles dan A. Michael Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. In SAGE Publication (Vol. 1304).
Murray, J. G. (2014). Procurement Fraud Vulnerability : A Case Study Procurement Fraud Vulnerability : A Case Study. EDPACS, 49(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2014.920669
Patricia GuarneridanRicardo Corrêa, G. (2019). Bisakah pengadaan publik menjadi strategis? Agenda masa depan. Jurnal Pengadaan Umum, 19(4), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-09-2018-0032
Priscila Ferreira de Ara ujo , Lima, S. M.-S. and C. V. (2021). Successful implementation of project risk management in small and medium enterprises : a cross-case analysis. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(4), 1023–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2020-0203
Pusdiklatwas, B. (2014). Tata Kelola, Manajemen Risiko, dan Pengendalian Intern. Pusdiklatwas BPKP.
Surat Edaran Mentri PUPR 04/SE/M/2021 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Manajemen Risiko di Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat, 1 (2021).
Robert K. Yin. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications (Sixth Edit). SAGE.
Roland, Almquist, Giuseppe, Grossi, G. Jan van, Helden, Christoph, R. (2013). Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.11.005
Said, J., & Khalid, M. A. (2016). Relationship between good governance and integrity system. Humanomics, 32(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/H-02-2016-0008
Siregar, A. (2018). Penerapan Risk Based Internal Auditing : Studi Kasus pada Plan International Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 12(1), 104–126.
Slamet, S. (2020). Peran Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah dalam Optimalisasi Implementasi Manajemen Risiko. Jurnal Pengawasan, 2(2), 49–58.
Thiel, S. Van, & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661
Tuannakotta, T. . (2016). Akutansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Salemba Empat.
Uma, S. and, & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business A Skill-Building Approach (Seventh Ed). WILEY
Vincent, J. (1996). Managing risk in public services A review of the international literature. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(2), 57–64.
Yadav, D. (2022). Criteria for Good Qualitative Research : A Comprehensive Review. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0
Yang, S., & Ishtiaq, M. (2018). Enterprise Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance , the Mediating Role of Competitive Advantage and the Moderating Role of Financial Literacy. Risk and Financial Management, 11(35), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm11030035
Yuli, A. (2020). Ketika manajemen risiko tak sekedar teori. Paris Review, 13–16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Therefore, the author must submit a statement of the Copyright Transfer Agreement.*)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In line with the license, authors and third parties (readers, researchers, and others) are allowed to share and adapt the material. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
________
*) Authors whose articles are accepted for publication will receive confirmation via email and send a Copyright Transfer Agreement.
