Access to Justice for Victims of Dating Violence: Gender Perspective

Trianah Sofiani*    -  Faculty of Sharia, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pekalongan, Pekalongan, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/sa.v16i1.5143

Legal handling of violence against women, including dating violence, ideally fulfills three elements of the legal system, namely legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. However, in its implementation, the legal handling of violence during dating is still gender biased. This article is the result of qualitative research with a gender perspective that explores the forms, causes, impacts of dating violence and access to justice for the victims of dating violence at Islamic Universities in Pekalongan. Data collection used observation, interviews, questionnaires, and literary studies and they were analyzed through an interactive model. The results showed the shape of dating violence, i.e.: verbal-emotional, physical, sexual, and economic. The main causes of dating violence are patriarchal culture and a lack of understanding of gender, which causes gender inequality, gender-biased parenting, women stereotype, and the absence of regulation about dating violence. Dating violence affects not only victims but also the perpetrators. The dating violence victims have not gained access to justice, because the legal system, which includes the substance, structure, and legal culture is still gender biased and patriarchal. This condition is confirmed by the fact that the community and victims do not know, understand, and be aware of their rights to justice. Therefore, we need efforts to understand gender and dating violence, including access to justice for victims, through student activity in and out of campus. Lawmaking about eliminating dating violence in the future (ius constituendum) must be part of the political agenda of the government and legislative.

Keywords: gender; dating violence; access to justice; patriarchy

  1. Adhi N., Wisnu. “Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan di Jateng Masih Tinggi.” Antara News, April 21, 2017. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/625333/kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan-di-jateng-masih-tinggi.
  2. Ariel, Yatdianto. “Kekerasan dalam Pacaran Ditinjau dari Prasangka Gender.” UNIKA Soegijapranata, Semarang, 2015.
  3. Arivia, Gadis. Filsafat Berperspektif Feminis. Jakarta: Yayasan Jurnal Perempuan, 2003.
  4. Azmiani, Azmiani, and Ratna Supradewi. “Hubungan Sikap Laki-Laki terhadap Kesetaraan Gender dengan Kekerasan dalam Pacaran.” Jurnal Psikologi Proyeksi 10, no. 1 (2015): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.30659/jp.10.1.49-60.
  5. Bates, Thomas R. “Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony.” Journal of the History of Ideas 36, no. 2 (April 1975): 351–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933.
  6. Boeree, C. George. Personality Theories: Melacak Kepribadian Anda Bersama Psikolog Dunia. Edited by Abdul Qodir Shaleh. Translated by Inyiak Ridwan Muzir. Yogyakarta: Prismasophie, 2017.
  7. Brewer, Gayle, and Loren Abell. “Machiavellianism, Relationship Satisfaction, and Romantic Relationship Quality.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology 13, no. 3 (2017): 491–502. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i3.1217.
  8. Chodorow, Nancy. The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978.
  9. Friedman, Lawrence M. Sistem Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2013.
  10. Huda, M. Nur. “Kekerasan Seksual pada Perempuan di Jateng Terhitung Tinggi.” Tribun Jateng, April 21, 2017. https://jateng.tribunnews.com/2017/04/21/kekerasan-seksual-pada-perempuan-di-jateng-terhitung-tinggi.
  11. Khusnaeny, Asmaul, and Ema Mukarrah. Membangun Akses ke Keadilan bagi Perempuan Korban Kekerasan: Perkembangan Konsep Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Penanganan Kasus Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan (SPPT-PKKTP). Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan - Komnas Perempuan, 2017.
  12. Komnas Perempuan. “CATAHU 2019: Korban Bersuara, Data Berbicara, Sahkan RUU Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual Sebagai Wujud Komitmen Negara. Catatan Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan Tahun 2018.” Komnas Perempuan, 2019. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan-detail/catahu-2019-korban-bersuara-data-berbicara-sahkan-ruu-penghapusan-kekerasan-seksual-sebagai-wujud-komitmen-negara-catatan-kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan-tahun-2018.
  13. Komnas Perempuan. “Lembar Fakta dan Poin Kunci Catatan Tahunan Komnas Perempuan Tahun 2019.” Komnas Perempuan, 2019. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan-detail/lembar-fakta-dan-poin-kunci-catatan-tahunan-komnas-perempuan-tahun-2019.
  14. Komnas Perempuan. “Siaran Pers Catatan Tahunan (CATAHU) Komnas Perempuan 2019: Hentikan Impunitas Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual dan Wujudkan Pemulihan yang Komprehensif Bagi Korban.” Komnas Perempuan, 2019. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/siaran-pers-detail/siaran-pers-catatan-tahunan-catahu-komnas-perempuan-2019.
  15. Krahe, B. Perilaku Agresif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.
  16. Lavoie, Francine, Line Robitaille, and Martine Hébert. “Teen Dating Relationships and Aggression.” Violence Against Women 6, no. 1 (2000): 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778010022181688.
  17. LBH Fakultas Syariah IAIN Pekalongan. “Laporan Hasil Survey,” 2018.
  18. Mansour, Fakih. Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. 10th ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.
  19. Mouffe, Chantal. “Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci.” In Gramsci and Marxist Theory (RLE: Gramsci). London: Routledge, 2014.
  20. Putri, Annora Mentari, and Agus Santoso. “Persepsi Orang Tua tentang Kekerasan Verbal pada Anak.” Jurnal Keperawatan Diponegoro 1, no. 1 (2012): 22–29.
  21. Raharjo, Agus, A Angkasa, and Rahadi Wasi Bintoro. “Akses Keadilan bagi Rakyat Miskin (Dilema dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum oleh Advokat).” Mimbar Hukum 27, no. 3 (2015): 432–444.
  22. Rankin, Micah B. “Access to Justice and the Institutional Limits of Independent Courts.” Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 30, no. 1 (2012): 101–38. https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4362.
  23. Rhode, Deborah L. Access to Justice. Oxford University Press, 2004.
  24. Shinta, Dewita Hayu, and Oetari Cintya Bramanti. Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga: Reduksi Bentuk-Bentuk Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga dalam RUU KUHP. Edited by Erasmus Cahyadi. Jakarta: LBH APIK dan Aliansi Nasional Reformasi KUHP, 2007.
  25. Strategi Nasional Akses pada Keadilan 2016-2019. Jakarta: Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional BAPPENAS RI, 2019.
  26. Straus, Murray A. “Prevalence of Violence Against Dating Partners by Male and Female University Students Worldwide.” Violence Against Women 10, no. 7 (2004): 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265552.
  27. Suryabrata, Sumadi. Psikologi Kepribadian. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.
  28. Tong, Rosemarie Putnam. Feminist Thought: Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Arus Utama Pemikiran Feminis. Yogayakarta: Jalasutra, 1998.
  29. Utami, Winda Rizwanti. “Hubungan Antara Harga Diri dengan Perilaku Kekerasan dalam Pacaran.” Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2016.
  30. Walgito, Bimo. Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2003.
  31. Wardani, Dyah Prita, and Yossy Setyanawati. “Tinjauan Viktimologi dan Perlindungan Hukum Korban Kekerasan dalam Pacaran.” Serambi Hukum 8, no. 2 (2015).
  32. Wollstonecraft, Mary. “Feminisme Liberal.” In Feminist Thought: Pengantar Paling Komprehensif Kepada Aliran Utama Pemikiran Feminis, edited by Rosemarie Putnam Tong. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 1998.
  33. Wulandari, Pingky. “Hubungan Antara Maskulinitas dengan Kekerasan dalam Pacaran pada Remaja Laki-Laki.” Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, 2019.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Center for Gender and Child Studies (Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak)
LP2M, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, Semarang.
Central Java, Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Sawwa Visitor Statistics
 
apps