Post-Publication Discussion

Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi recognizes post-publication discussion as an important part of maintaining the integrity, transparency, and continuous development of scientific knowledge. The journal welcomes constructive scholarly discussion concerning published articles, including comments, critical evaluations, clarifications, and responses that contribute to the advancement of psychological research and practice.

1. Submission of Post-Publication Comments

Readers and researchers may submit comments or scholarly responses concerning articles published in Psikohumaniora. Submissions should address substantive scientific issues, such as the theoretical framework, research methodology, data interpretation, validity of conclusions, or implications of the published findings.

All submissions must be evidence-based, relevant to the article under discussion, written in a professional and respectful manner, and supported by appropriate scholarly references where necessary. Personal attacks, defamatory statements, unsupported allegations, and comments unrelated to the scientific content of the article will not be considered.

2. Editorial Assessment

All post-publication comments and responses are subject to editorial assessment. The editor will evaluate their relevance, scientific merit, factual accuracy, ethical compliance, and contribution to scholarly discourse.

The editor may request revisions, consult independent experts, or seek clarification from the original authors when necessary. The journal reserves the right to reject submissions that do not meet its editorial and ethical standards.

3. Right of Response

When a post-publication comment raises substantive questions or criticisms concerning a published article, the journal may invite the original authors to provide a response. Authors are expected to address the issues raised objectively, provide supporting evidence where appropriate, and clarify any limitations or uncertainties in their original work.

The decision to publish a comment and its corresponding response rests with the editor. The journal aims to ensure that relevant scientific disagreements are handled fairly and that readers have access to balanced scholarly discussion.

4. Corrections and Retractions

Post-publication discussions that identify potential errors, inaccuracies, or concerns regarding research integrity will be evaluated in accordance with the journal's publication ethics policies.

If a significant error is confirmed, the journal may publish a correction or other appropriate editorial notice. If concerns indicate that the validity or integrity of the article may be seriously compromised, the editor may conduct further investigation, consult independent experts, and contact the relevant authors or institutions when appropriate.

Retraction may be considered when the evidence establishes that an article meets the journal's criteria for retraction. All corrective actions will be undertaken transparently, with the aim of preserving the integrity of the scholarly record.

5. Ethical Standards and Confidentiality

All parties involved in post-publication discussions must uphold the principles of academic integrity, objectivity, fairness, and confidentiality where applicable. Authors, commenters, reviewers, and editors must disclose relevant conflicts of interest and avoid using the discussion process for personal, professional, or other inappropriate purposes.

Allegations of misconduct must be handled carefully and assessed on the basis of credible evidence. The journal will provide relevant parties with an appropriate opportunity to respond before making editorial decisions, where applicable.

6. Publication and Accessibility

Accepted post-publication comments, author responses, and related editorial notices may be published on the journal's website or through other appropriate journal publication mechanisms. Such materials should clearly identify the article under discussion and provide sufficient context for readers to understand the issues raised.

The journal aims to maintain a transparent scholarly record and ensure that substantive post-publication concerns and their outcomes are communicated appropriately to readers.

Through this policy, Psikohumaniora is committed to fostering constructive scientific dialogue, addressing legitimate concerns about published research, and supporting the reliability and credibility of the scholarly literature.