Perempuan, Jilbab, dan Solidaritas Kemanusiaan: Studi Gerakan Perempuan Berhijab Pasca Tragedi New Zealand

Authors

  • Wildani Hefni Institut Agama Islam Negeri Jember - The Australian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v14i1.3511

Keywords:

woman, jilbab, social solidarity

Abstract

The movement of humanities solidarity that is widely voiced is the women's movement specifically to wear the hijab (hijab) as a form of solidarity with Muslims. women take a role that is based on the awareness of the importance of togetherness wearing headscarves as a symbol of strength to reject any rhetoric of hatred on any basis, be it identity, religion, race, and ethnicity. This paper describes the veiled women's movement as a form of humanitarian solidarity in the aftermath of the New Zealand tragedy. A descriptive qualitative study of library research was conducted using the Durkheiminism approach. This study produces findings that the hijab has a symbol of religious meaning that is closely related to solidarity and social identity. The veil becomes a symbol of social solidarity as well as resistance to abuse. The hijab movement was born as a collective act to revive the spirit of togetherness among religious followers in combating various acts of radicalism and terrorism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adlin, Alfatri. Menggeledah Hasrat: Sebuah Pendekatan Multi Perspektif. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2006.

Asmawi, Mohammad. Islam Sensual: Membedah Fenomena Jilbab Trendi. Yogyakarta: Darussalam, 2003.

Baldwin, J. Mark. “The Basis of Social Solidarity.” American Journal of Sociology 15, no. 6 (1910): 817–31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2762490.

Beydoun, Khaled A. “Between Anti-Black Racism and Islamophobia.” In American Islamophobia: Understanding the Roots and Rise of Fear, 152–73. Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2018. www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctv1wxs79.10.

Carithers, Martha W. “Conceptualization and Analytic Unit in Durkheim.” Mid-American Review of Sociology 2, no. 2 (1977): 71–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/23252574.

Davary, Bahar. “Miss Elsa and the Veil: Honor, Shame, and Identity Negotiations.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 25, no. 2 (2009): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.2979/fsr.2009.25.2.47.

Durkheim, Emile. The Division of Labor in Society. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1960.

Efremenko, Dmitry, dan Yaroslava Evseeva. “Studies of Social Solidarity in Russia: Tradition and Modern Trends.” The American Sociologist 43, no. 4 (2012): 349–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/23319618.

Guindi, Fadwa El. Veil: Modesty, Privacy and Resistance. New York: Berg, 1999.

Hart, H. L. A. “Social Solidarity and the Enforcement of Morality.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35, no. 1 (1967): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1598946.

Jamarkani, Amira. Imagining Arab Womanhood: The Cultural Mythology of Veils, Harems, and Belly Dancers in The U.S. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

Jary, David, dan Julia Jary. Collins Dictionary of Sociology. Glasgow, Scotland: Collins, 2012.

Johnson, Doyle Paul. Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 1994.

Jumala, Darmansjah. “Paradoks Teror Selandia Baru.” Opini Kompas, 25 Maret 2019.

Kumar, Deepa. Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire. Chicago Illinois, United States: Haymarket Books, 2012.

Kundnani, Arun. “Islamophobia and Empire: An Intermestic Approach to the Study of Anti-Muslim Racism.” In What is Islamophobia? Racism, Social Movements and the State, diedit oleh Narzanin Massoumi, Tom Mills, dan David Miller. London: Pluto Press, 2017.

Majid, Anouar. “The Politics of Feminism in Islam.” Signs 23, no. 2 (1998): 321–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/3175093.

Nasir, Mohamad Abdun. “The Veil at the Crossroads: Muḥammad Saʻīd al-‘Ashmāwī and The Discourse on the Ḥijāb in Egypt.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 42, no. 1 (2004): 89–131. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2004.421.89-131.

Nordius, Janina. “Racism and Radicalism in Jamaican Gothic: Cynric R. Williams’s ‘Hamel, the Obean Man.’” ELH 73, no. 3 (2006): 673–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/30030031.

Schoenfeld, Eugen, dan Stjepan G. Mestrovic. “Durkheim’s Concept of Justice and Its Relationship to Social Solidarity.” Sociological Analysis 50, no. 2 (1989): 111–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710982.

Setiawan, Eko. “Fenomena Jilbab dalam Persepektif Sosiologi.” Dialogia 14, no. 1 (2016): 103–20. https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v14i1.646.

Shahab, Husen. Jilbab menurut al-Qur’an dan Sunnah. Bandung: Mizan, 1996.

Thoyibi, M. “Makna Jilbab bagi Perempuan Muslim Amerika: Dinamika Perjumpaan Islam dan Budaya Amerika.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan 11, no. 1 (2011): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v11i1.81-96.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-30

Issue

Section

Articles