The Social Aspects of Gender-responsiveness in Schools

Authors

  • Indah Wigati Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah UIN Raden Fatah Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v14i2.4523

Keywords:

social aspects, gender-responsiveness, schools

Abstract

Schools are strategic institutions to fight for gender equality. There is one school in South Sumatera that applies the concept of gender, namely SMA 2 Sekayu. This study aims to analyze the social aspects of gender-responsiveness in schools. The approach used is descriptive qualitative phenomenological. The informants consisted of school principals, teachers, students, school committees, and education staff. Data were collected through observation, interviews, documentation and analyzed using an interactive model of analysis consisting of reduction, presentation, and verification. Meanwhile, the social aspects of gender-responsiveness were analyzed through Longwe. The results showed that the implementation of gender-oriented schools on social aspects involved women and men of the school committee. Teachers' and parents’ interactions run well. The school had a puberty management forum for male and female students. The interaction of all school members is in accordance with the concepts of gender equality. But the teacher did not yet have the ability to control and detect sexual harassment against students. To realize gender-responsiveness, all components in the school must have gender sensitivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Indah Wigati, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

References

Afrizal. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Sebagai Upaya Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

Alase, Abayomi. “The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach.” International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies 5, no. 2 (2017): 9–19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9.

Arif, Ernita, Aida Vitayala S. Hubeis, Basita Ginting, Ninuk Purnaningsih, and Amiruddin Saleh. “Gender-responsive in Class: Study of Communication Behavior Teacher in Elementary School.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 4, no. 9 (2014). http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_9_July_2014/30.pdf.

Direktorat Pendidikan Nonformal dan Informal. Panduan Sekolah Berwawasan Gender. Jakarta: Subdin Pendidikan Perempuan DPM, 2008.

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2000.

Fridell, Max, Rebecca Newcom Belcher, and Phillip E. Messner. “Discriminate Analysis Gender Public School Principal Servant Leadership Differences.” Leadership and Organization Development Journal 30, no. 8 (2009): 722–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730911003894.

Hailu, Meseret F. “Examining the Role of Girl Effect in Contributing to Positive Education Ideologies for Girls in Ethiopia.” Gender and Education 31, no. 8 (2019): 986–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1440284.

Hidir, Achmad, Nur Laila Meilani, and Harapan Tua RFS. “Pendidikan Responsif Gender Di Kabupaten Rokan Hilir.” Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 5, no. 2 (2016): 214–31. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v5i2.3710.

Idi, Abdullah. Sosiologi Pendidikan (Individu, Masyarakat dan Pendidikan). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2011.

Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. Acuan Pelaksanaan Sekolah Menengah Atas Berwawasan Gender. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, 2010.

Lexy J. Moleong. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.

Mahpur, Mohammad. Memantapkan Analisis Data Kualitatif Melalui Tahapan Koding. Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2017.

McDowell, Joanne, and Revert Klattenberg. “Does Gender Matter? A Cross-National Investigation of Primary Class-Room Discipline.” Gender and Education 31, no. 8 (2019): 947–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1458078.

Miles, B. Mathew, and A. Michael Huberman. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press, 1992.

Mohanty, Itismita, and Anu Rammohan. “Child Schooling in India: The Role of Gender.” Indian Growth and Development Review 8, no. 1 (2015): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-03-2014-0008.

Mufidah. Gender di Pesantren Salafi. Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2010.

Nugroho, Riant. Gender dan Strategi Pengarusutamaannya di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: BPFE, 2008.

Nurhaeni, Ida, and Yusuf Kurniawan. “Gender-Mainstreaming in Technical and Vocational Education and Training.” In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306:1–6. Institute of Physics Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012057.

Qibtiyah, Alimatul. “Indonesian Muslim Women and the Gender Equality Movement.” Journal of Indonesian Islam 3, no. 1 (2009): 168–96. https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2009.3.1.168-196.

Rawls, John. Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University, 1973.

Soejono. Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2009.

Sugiarti, Tri Sakti Handayani. Konsep dan Teknik Penelitian Gender. Malang: UMM, 2002.

Suryadi, Ace, and Ecep Idris. Kesetaraan Gender dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: Genesindo, 2004.

Tim Gender dan Inklusif Gender. Pembelajaran Inklusif Gender. Jakarta: Indonesia Australia Patnership In Basic Educational, 2007.

Watson, Penelope W.St J., Christine M. Rubie-Davies, Kane Meissel, Elizabeth R. Peterson, Annaline Flint, Lynda Garrett, and Lyn McDonald. “Teacher Gender, and Expectation of Reading Achievement in New Zealand Elementary School Students: Essentially a Barrier?” Gender and Education 31, no. 8 (2019): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2017.1410108.

Wibowo, Dwi Edi. “Sekolah Berwawasan Gender.” Muwazah: Jurnal Kajian Gender 2, no. 1 (2010): 191–96. http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Muwazah/article/view/5.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-21

Issue

Section

Articles