Bahagia dalam Meraih Cita-cita: Kesejahteraan Subjektif Mahasiswa Teknik Arsitektur Ditinjau dari Regulasi Emosi dan Efikasi Diri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/pjpp.v2i1.1357Keywords:
emotion regulatian, self efficacy, subjective well-beingAbstract
Abstract: Subjective well-being is people’s evaluation of they life. It includes evaluation about cognitive and affective. People have higher subjective well-being, they have a more positive affective or good feelings and satisfied with the life they have. Contrary, people who have lower subjective well-being tend to overcome negative feelings in him. Therefore, subjective well-being is very important in the life of every individual is no exception to the new students. There are many factors that influence the subjective well-being such as sex, religion, education, intelligence emotion regulation and self efficacy. This study focused on the influence of self efficacy and regulasi emosi toward subjective well-being. This study aims to look at the effects of self-efficacy and emotion regulation towards students’s subjective well-being. The study involved 107 new students majoring in engineering architecture that consists of 51 men and 56 women This study uses a quantitative approach which is measured using four scales that is Possitive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), General Self efficacy (GSE), and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) to measure emotion regulation. The results show that there is the influence of self-efficacy and emotion regulation on subjective well-being. Simultanously, self-efficacy and regulation of emotions influence subjective well-being of 32.5% to the subjective well-being. But partialy, self efficacy more has contribute to subjective well-being, than emotion regulation.
Abstrak: Subjective well-being merupakan evaluasi individu terhadap kehidupannya yang meliputi penilaian kognitif dan afeksi. Individu dikatakan memiliki subjective well-being tinggi jika mengalami lebih banyak afeksi positif atau perasaan menyenangkan dan puas atas kehidupan yang dimiliki. Sebaliknya, orang yang memiliki subjective well-being rendah cenderung diliputi perasaan-perasaan negatif dalam dirinya. Oleh sebab itu, subjective well-being sangat penting dalam kehidupan setiap individu tidak terkecuali pada mahasiswa baru. Ada banyak faktor yang mempengaruhi subjective well-being antara lain jenis kelamin, religiusitas, pendidikan, kecerdasan, regulasi emosi dan self efficacy. Penelitian ini memfocuskan tentang pengaruh efikasi diri dan regulasi emosi terhadap subjective well-being. Penelitian ini melibatkan 107 orang mahasiswa baru jurusan teknik arsitektur yang terdiri dari 51 orang laki-laki dan 56 orang perempuan Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif yang diukur menggunakan empat skala yaitu Possitive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), General Self efficacy (GSE) dan Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ). Analisis yang dilakukan adalah analisis deskripsi dan regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh self efficacy dan regulasi emosi terhadap subjective well-being. Secara bersama-sama, self efficacy dan regulasi emosi mempengaruhi subjective well-being sebesar 32,5%terhadap subjective well-being. Secara terpisah, self efficacy memberikan sumbangan sebanyak 21,62% dan regulasi emosi sebanyak 3,53% terhadap subjective well-being.
Downloads
References
Alwisol. (2009). Psikologi kepribadian, edisi revisi. Malang: UMM press.
Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (2005). Psikologi sosial (10 ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. American Psychological Association, 95(3), 542–575.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327752jpa4901_13
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychologica Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.
Diener, Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of clinical psychology, (24), 25–41.
Djalaluddin, A., Basid, A., Habib, Z., & Rahman, A. F. (2012). Tarbiyah ulul albab; melacak tradisi membentuk pribadi. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2000). Dispositional emotionality and regulation: their role in predicting quality of social functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.1.136
Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. (2015). Pedoman Pendidikan Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi. Malang: Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 271–299.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.
Irfan, M., & Suprapti, V. (2014). Hubungan self-efficacy dengan penyesuaian diri terhadap perguruan tinggi pada mahasiswa baru Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Airlangga. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Perkembangan, 3(3), 172–178.
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction : The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17–34.
Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457
Maujean, A., & Davis, P. (2013). The relationship between self-efficacy and well-being in stroke survivors. International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1(7). https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9096.1000159
Putri, D. A., & Suprapti, V. (2014). Hubungan antara self efficacy dengan subjective well-being pada mahasiswa baru Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya (PENS) yang kos. Jurnal Psikologi Industri Dan Organisasi. Diambil dari http://www.journal. unair.ac.id/article_8909_media50_category10.html
Rakhmawaty, A., Afiatin, T., & Rini, R. I. S. (2011). Pengaruh Pelatihan Regulasi Emosi Terhadap Peningkatan Subjective Well-being Pada Penderita Diabetes Mellitus. Jurnal Intervensi Psikologi (JIP), 3(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.20885/ intervensipsikologi.vol3.iss2.art3
Santos, M. C. J., Magramo Jr., C. S., & Oguan Jr., F. (2014). Establishing the relationship between general self-efficacy and subjective well-being among college students. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 3(1), 1–12.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston. Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. causal and control beliefs, 35–37.
Sharma, B. (2012). Adjustment and emotional maturity among first year college students. Pakistan Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(3), 32.
Singh, B., & Udainiya, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and well-being of adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35(2), 227 – 232.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the accepted article shall be assigned to the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to published articles.
In line with the license, authors and any users (readers and other researchers) are allowed to share and adapt the material only for non-commercial purposes. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
