Application of the CIPPO Evaluation Model in the Islamic Religious Education Study Program

Nur Asiyah*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Karnadi Karnadi  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Musthofa Musthofa  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Universities are required to improve quality, one of which is through accreditation. This study aims to evaluate the quality in the face of accreditation and analyze the constraints and supporting factors. This type of research is evaluation research and uses a qualitative approach. The assessment method is done through document studies, interviews, and observations. The data analysis technique used descriptive qualitative analysis. The study results recommend that the Islamic Religious Education Study Program arrange steps for accreditation preparation using the nine criteria instrument. Context evaluation includes changes to accreditation instruments and curriculum changes. Evaluation of inputs, human resources, infrastructure, and financial accessibility meets quality standards, only lacking in the number of study-based lecturers. The criteria for evaluating the process, learning process, research, and community service have met the quality standard. Criteria for evaluating products scientific works like articles, research journals, books, and publications. Evaluation criteria for outcome components that the quality of study programs is assessed from the competitiveness of graduates and the performance of graduates for the community of stakeholders have met quality standards. The quality evaluation constraint found that the ratio of the number of lecturers was not based on the study program. At the same time, the supporting factor was the increasing number of integrated online services.

Keywords: quality, evaluation, CIPPO, accreditation

  1. Abdullah, S., Evaluasi Pembelajaran; Konsep Dasar, Teori dan Aplikasi, (Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2012),
  2. Arcaro, SJ, Quality in Education: An Implementation Handbook, terj. Yosal Iriantara, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1995)
  3. Arikunto, S & Jabar, C. S. A., Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, (Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014)
  4. Arikunto, S., Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010)
  5. Bachtiar, R. W., “Model Evaluasi Countenance Stake Menggunakan Pendekatan Analisis Rasch Terhadap Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Kolaboratif”, Jurnal Saintifika, Vol.18, N0.1, 2016.
  6. Daryanto, Evaluasi Pendidikan, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008)
  7. Dokumen Borang Akreditasi Program Studi PAI FITK UIN Walisongo Tahun 2017
  8. Dokumen Jurusan PAI FITK UIN Walisongo.
  9. Dokumen Naskah Akademik Program Studi PAI FITK UIN Walisongo Tahun 2020.
  10. Dokumen Naskah Akademik Program Studi PAI FITK UIN Walisongo Tahun 2015.
  11. Fitrah, M., dkk., “Urgensi Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal Terhadap Peningkatan Mutu Perguruan Tinggi”, Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, Vol. 4, No.1, 2018.
  12. Gaspersz, V., Total Quality Management. (Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005)
  13. Griffin, P. & Nix, P., Educational Assessment and Reporting, (Sydney: Harcout Brace Javanovic Publisher, 1991)
  14. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Online
  15. Keputusan Rektor UIN Walisongo Semarang No. 403 Tahun 2017 tentang Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal.
  16. Peraturan Badan Akreditasi Nasional No 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Instrumen Akreditasi.
  17. Purwanto, Evaluasi Hasil Belajar, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013)
  18. Pusat Teknologi Informasi dan Pangkalan Data (PTIPD) UIN Walisongo Semarang
  19. Sallis, E., Total Quality Management in Education, London: Kogan Page Limited, 2002, hlm. 11
  20. Septi, I. A. Y., ”Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Manajemen malalui Pengembangan Mutu Sekolah”, Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2012.
  21. Soedarsono, J. W., Sosialisasi Instrumen Akreditasi PT 3.0 BAN PT pada LL Dikti 3 Kemristekdikti, Bogor: 20-22 September 2018
  22. Stake, R.E, Program Evaluation Particularly Responsive Evaluation, (Urbana; University of Illinois, 1977)
  23. Stufflebeam, D. L. & Shinkfield, A. J., Evaluation theory, models and applications. 1st edition. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007)
  24. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif , Kualitatif dan & D, (Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2010),
  25. Tan, S., Lee, N. & Hall, D., CIPP as a Model for Evaluating learning Space, Swinburne University of Technology, 2010
  26. Tayibnapis, F. Y., Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008)
  27. Trianto, Pengantar Penelitian bagi Pengembangan Profesi Pendidikan dan Tenaga Kependidikan. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2010)
  28. Wicaksono, G. W. dan Andi Al-Rizki, “Peningkatan Kualitas Evaluasi Mutu Akademik Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Melalui Sistem Informasi Mutu (SIMUTU)”, Jurnal Kinetik, V.1, No. 1, 2016
  29. Wirawan. Evaluasi: teori, model, standar, aplikasi, dan profesi. (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011).
  30. Worthen, B. R. & Sanders, J. R. Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. (Worthington, Ohio: Charles A. Jones Publishing Company, 2003)
  31. Zaenal Arifin, Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip, Teknik, Prosedur (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2009)

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 At-Taqaddum
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
At-Taqaddum
Published by Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu
Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Walisongo No.3-5 Semarang 50185, Indonesia
Phone: +62 857-1999-1679
Website: https://lpm.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: attaqaddum@walisongo.ac.id 
 
 
apps