From fatwa to social media: Unleashing global muslim solidarity through fatwa and digital activism movement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2024.9.1.20501Keywords:
BDS Movement, Digital Activism, Global Humanity, Julid FisabilillahAbstract
The Israel-Palestine war has brought an enormous amount of attention to religious tension, global solidarity, and humanitarian movement in the Muslim world. This study investigates the underlying factor behind the fatwa issuance and its impact on the new trend of global solidarity in the digital sphere. The theory of mediation of meaning and new media by Hoover has been used to navigate the Fatwa of the Indonesian Ulama Council. This fatwa, regarding boycotts, divestments, sanctions movement, and the spread of Julid Fisabilillah digital activism, is a significant factor in shaping global Muslim solidarity. The digital activism is conducted by Indonesian and Malaysian netizens on specific social media platforms such as X, Instagram, and Telegram. This paper aims to contribute to the promotion of solidarity, compassion, and moral principles as fundamental aspects of humaneness. The research methods involved using a desk research methodology to collect data by analyzing scientific papers, digital media such as news, social media platforms, and literature reviews. The results indicated that this new trend of movements served as a means of expressing concern and advocating for humanity's values. It also aimed to create social justice and beneficial impact through humanitarian aid and establish emotional and moral connections to the Palestinian cause. Subsequently, the elements of religious tension, intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, have intertwined roles in influencing this situation.
*****
Perang antara Israel-Palestina telah menyita banyak perhatian dari mulai esensi ketegangan agama, solidaritas global, hingga gerakan kemanusiaan di dunia Muslim. Studi ini berusaha untuk menyelidiki faktor yang mendasari diterbitkannya Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) terkait dukungan terhadap Palestina dan dampaknya terhadap tren baru solidaritas global di ranah digital. Teori mediasi makna dan media baru oleh Hoover diaplikasikan untuk menavigasi dampak dari Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia yang berkenaan dengan gerakan boikot, divestasi, sanksi terhadap produk yang mendukung Israel dan penyebarannya melalui aktivisme digital Julid Fisabilillah yang banyak digalakkan oleh warganet Indonesia dan Malaysia di beberapa platform media sosial seperti X, Instagram dan Telegram. Tulisan ini memiliki kontribusi untuk meningkatkan solidaritas, kasih sayang, dan menegakkan prinsip-prinsip moral sebagai aspek dasar kemanusiaan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kepustakaan untuk mengumpulkan data dengan menganalisis beberapa karya ilmiah terdahulu, media digital seperti berita, platform media sosial, dan tinjauan literatur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tren gerakan baru ini berfungsi sebagai sarana efektif untuk mengekspresikan kepedulian dan mengadvokasi nilai-nilai kemanusiaan yang bertujuan untuk menciptakan keadilan sosial dan dampak yang bermanfaat melalui bantuan kemanusiaan, membangun hubungan emosional dan moral sejalan dengan perjuangan warga Palestina. Selanjutnya, elemen-elemen ketegangan agama, baik religiusitas intrinsik maupun ekstrinsik, memiliki peran yang saling terkait dalam mempengaruhi situasi ini.
Downloads
References
Abu-Lughod, L. (2015). Do Muslim women need saving? (First Harvard University Press paperpack edition). Harvard University Press.
Bernal, V., & Grewal, I. (Eds.). (2014). Theorizing NGOs: States, feminisms, and neoliberalism. Duke University Press.
Burroughs, B. (2013). FCJ-165 Obama trolling: Memes, salutes and an agonistic politics in the 2012 presidential election. Fibre culture Journal, 22, 257–276.
Burroughs, B., & Feller, G. (2015). Religious memetics: Institutional authority in digital/lived religion. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 39(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859915603096.
Campbell, H. (n.d.). When religion meets new media. Routledge & CRC Press. Retrieved January 23, 2024, from https://www.routledge.com/When-Religion-Meets-New-Media/Campbell/p/book/9780415349574.
Cheong, P. H. (2010). Faith tweets: Ambient religious communication and microblogging rituals. M/C Journal, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.223
Cheong, P. H. (2012). Digital religion, social media and culture: perspectives, practices, futures (pp. 191–206). Peter Lang.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/onix07/99006680.html.
Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2016). “It Gets Better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford University Press.
Guardia, A. L. (2001). Holy Land, Unholy War: Israelis and Palestinians. John Murray.
humanity—Advanced search results in Meanings | Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved December 30, 2023, from https://www.oed.com/search/advanced/Meanings?textTermText0=humanity&textTermOpt0=Definition
Jaffee, M. S. (2001). One God, one revelation, one people: On the symbolic structure of elective monotheism. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 69(4), 753–776. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/69.4.753.
Landau, Y. (n.d.). Holy land, unholy War: The Religious Dimension.
Lewis, D. (2010). Nongovernmental organizations, definition and history. In H. K. Anheier & S. Toepler (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Civil Society (pp. 1056–1062). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4_3.
M.I. (n.d.). South Africa institutes proceedings against Israel and requests the International Court of Justice to indicate provisional measures—ICJ Press Release. Question of Palestine. Retrieved January 14, 2024, from https://www.un.org/unispal/document/icj-southafrica-israel-genocide-29dec2023/
Milner, R. (2013). FCJ-156 hacking the social: Internet memes, identity antagonism, and the logic of lulz. The Fibreculture Journal. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/FCJ-156-Hacking-the-Social%3A-Internet-Memes%2C-and-the-Milner/7af614e5b2102e99effe335aed54f4cb266b6801.
Nakissa, A. (2020). Security, Islam, and Indonesia: an anthropological analysis of indonesia’s national counterterrorism agency. Bijdragen Tot De Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal Of The Humanities And Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 176(2–3), 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-bja10004.
Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., Silva, L. D., Gilbert, N., & Huang, R. (2013, October 1). Sarcasm as Contrast between a Positive Sentiment and Negative Situation. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sarcasm-as-Contrast-between-a-Positive-Sentiment-Riloff-Qadir/b0e31bf1d900a4d33c2c233d84e6275568f1e3d3.
Rotger, N., Roig-Sanz, D., & Puxan-Oliva, M. (2019). Introduction: Towards a cross-disciplinary history of the global in the humanities and the social sciences. Journal of Global History, 14(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740022819000147.
Rozehnal, R. (2022). Cyber muslims: Mapping Islamic digital media in the internet age. Bloomsbury Academic.
Sarcasm. (2024, January 10). https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/learner-english/sarcasm
Shah, V., Sivitanides, M., & Mehta, M. (2013). The era of digital activism. International Journal of Information Technology, Communications and Convergence, 2(4), 295. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJITCC.2013.059409.
Singer, P. (1999). Practical ethics (2. ed., reprinted). Cambridge University Press.
Wiggins, B. E., & Bowers, G. B. (2015). Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society, 17(11), 1886–1906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194
Yarchi, M., & Boxman-Shabtai, L. (2023). The image war moves to TikTok evidence from the may 2021 round of the israeli-palestinian conflict. Digital Journalism, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2291650.
Yehezkel, L. (n.d.). Healing the holy land: Interreligious peacebuilding in Israel/Palestine. Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. Retrieved January 23, 2024, from https://lccn.loc.gov/2003373618.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Therefore, the author must submit a statement of the Copyright Transfer Agreement.*)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In line with the license, authors and third parties (readers, researchers, and others) are allowed to share and adapt the material only for non-commercial purposes. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors and third parties (readers, researchers, and others) remix, transform or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
*) Authors whose articles are accepted for publication will receive confirmation via email to send a Copyright Transfer Agreement.
