STUDI TENTANG KESADARAN BERPIKIR METAKOGNISI MAHASISWA SEMESTER I JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA FKIP UHO
Main Article Content
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) meninjau kesadaran metakognisi mahasiswa Jurusan
Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UHO secara umum, (2) meninjau kesadaran metakognisi
mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UHO berdasarkan nilai UN Matematika
di SMA, (3) meninjau kesadaran metakognisi mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika
FKIP UHO berdasarkan asal SMA, dan (4) meninjau kesadaran metakognisi mahasiswa
Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UHO berdasarkan jenis kelamin. Kedasaran
metakognisi mahasiswa terdiri atas 4 tingkatan/level yakni level 1 (tacit use), level 2
(aware use), level 3 (strategic use), dan level 4 (reflective use). Berdasarkan hasil
penelitian disimpulkan bahwa: (1) Umumnya (53,9%) Tingkat Kesadaran Metakognisi
mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UHO berada pada level 1 (tacit use),
dan sebagian kecil (12,7%) berada pada level 4 (reflective use). (2) Umumnya (55,82%)
mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UHO yang memiliki nilai UN
matematika antara 70 sampai 90, dan hanya 13,95% memperoleh nilai UN matematika
90 ke atas. Dari nilai UN matematika mahasiswa yang kurang dari 90, umumnya masih
berada pada level 1 (tacit use), sedangkan nilai UN matematika mahasiswa 90 ke atas
umumnya sudah berada pada level 4 (reflective use). (3) Umumnya (53,97%) mahasiswa
Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UHO berdomisili di luar kota. Dan dari mahasiswa
yang berdomisili diluar kota tersebut, umumnya (61,77%) tingkat kesadaran metakognisi
mahasiswa masih berada pada Level 1 (tacit use), dan hanya 2,94% berada pada level 4
(reflective use). Sedangkan mahasiswa yang berdomisili di kota, tingkat kesadaran
metakognisi mahasiswa yang berada pada Level 1 (tacit use) hanya 44,83%), dan pada
level 4 (reflective use) ada 24,14%. Dan (4) Umumnya (63,49%) mahasiswa Jurusan
Pendidikan Matematika FKIP UHO adalah perempuan. Sedangkan tingkat kesadaran
metakognisi mahasiswa antara laki-laki dan perempuan relatif sama.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in PHENOMENON.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Anastasia Efklides, 2011, Interactions of Metacognition With Motivation and
Affect in Self-Regulated Learning: The MASRL Model, EDUCATIONAL
PSYCHOLOGIST, 46(1), 6–25, 2011, Copyright Division 15, American
Psychological Association ISSN: 0046-1520.
Anderson, Neil J., 2002, “The Role Of Metacognition in Second Language
Teaching and Learning”. Digest April 2002. Tersedia pada:
http://www.cal.org/ericcll /digest. Diakses pada 11 Februari 2006.
Barbara K. Hofer, 2010, Epistemological Understanding as a Metacognitive
Process: Thinking Aloud During Online Searching, Educational
Psychologist, Version of record first published: 08 Jun 2010.
Biryukov, P. ,2003, Metacognitive Aspect of Solving Combinatorics
Problems. [Online]. http://www.cimt.pymouth.ac.uk/journal/biryukov.pdf
Blakey and Spence, 1990, Developing Metacognition. ERIC Digest. [Online]:
http://www.ericdigest.org/pre-9218/developing.htm. [19 Mar 2010].
Christoph, Noor. 2006, The Role of Metacognitive Skills in Learning to Solve
Problems Deutch: SIKS.
Fitaria Sophianingtyas dan Bambang Sugiarto, 2013, Identifikasi Level Metakognitif
Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Materi Perhitungan Kimia , UNESA Journal of
Chemical EducationVol. 2, No. 1, pp. 21-27 Januari 2013 ISSN: 2252-
Garofalo, J. & Lester, F. K. ,1985, “Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring,
and Mathematical Performance”. Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education.
Huitt, William G.,1997, Metacognition.[Online]. http://tip.psychology.org/-
meta.html. [17 Maret 2010] Keiichi, Shigematsu. (2000). “Metacognition in
Mathematics Education”.Mathematics Education in Japan. Japan : JSME,
July 2000.
Kamid, 2013, Metakognisi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika (Studi
Kasus pada Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Gender), Edumatica Volume 03 Nomor
, April 2013, ISSN: 2088-2157.
Kraler, Christian, 1995, Strategic Teaching and Reading Project Guidebook:
Metacognition, Australia: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
La Misu, 2015, Strategi Pengembangan Metakognisi Mahasiswa dalam
Mempelajari Teori Bilangan Berdasarkan Model Pembelajaran Perilaku,
Pendidikan Matematika UMP- Purwokerto, 12 Desember 2015, (Prosiding)
Laurens,Theresia, 2009, Penjenjangan Metakognisi Siswa, Disertasi. Universitas
Negeri Surabaya.
Livingstone, Jennifer A.,1997, “Metacognition: An Overview”
http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.html.)
Matlin, M. W., 2003, Cognition. Fifth Edition. Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Marcel V.J. Veenman, 2004, The relation between intellectual and Metacognitiv
skills from a developmental perspective, Learning and Instruction 14 (2004)
–109.
McIntosh, R. dan Jarret, D. (2000). Teaching Mathematical Problem Solving:
Implementing The Vision. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.nwrel.org/msec/
images/mpm/pdf/ monograph.pdf [12 Mei 2008].
Mulbar, Usman, 2008, “Metakognisi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah
Matematika”, Tersedia pada: http//www.usmanmulbar.files. wordpress. com.
Diakses pada 8 Mei 2008.
OLRC News. (2004), “Metacognition” Tersedia pada: http://www.literacy.
kent.edu/ ohioeff/resource.doc.
Papaleontiou, Eleonora. 2008. Metacognition and Theory of Mind, United
Kingdom, Cambridge Schoolar Publishing
Peirce, William, 2003, “Metacognition: Study Strategies, Monitoring, and
Motivation”, http://www.academic.pgcc.edu /wpeirce/MCCCTR /index.html.
Risnanosanti, 2008, Kemampuan Metakognitif siswa dalam Pembelajaran
Matematika, Jurnal Pythagoras, Volume 4 No. 1, Juni 2008.
Ryan A. Hargrove, 2012, Assessing the long-term impact of a metacognitive
approach to creative skill development, Int J Technol Des Educ DOI 10.1007/
s10798-011- 9200-6, _ Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012.
Stanley Mohandoss Stephen & Xavier Pradheep Singh, 2010, Learning Grammar
Autonomously through Metacognitive Strategies: An Experiment, Journal of
NELTA Vol. 15 No. 1-2 December 2010.
Slavin R.E., 2011, Psikologi Pendidikan Teori dan Praktek, Edisi kesembilan, PT.
Indeks Jakarta.
Swartz, Robert J. and Perkins, D. N, 1989, Teaching Thinking: Issues and
Approaches. Revised Edition. The Practitioners' Guide to Teaching Thinking
Series.
Utu Rahim dan La Misu, 2015, The Resolution Integral Approach to
Metacognition in Math Education Student of Halu Oleo University ,
International Journal of Education and Research, Edisi Augustus 2015, Vol. 3
no. 8.
Wilson, Jeni dan Clark, David. 2004. Toward the Modelling of Mathematical
Metacognition. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2004, Vol. 16, No.
, 25-48, University of Melbourne.