Analisis Soal PLSV pada Buku Ajar Matematika dari Kurikulum 1994 hingga Kurikulum 2013
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in PHENOMENON.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Özgeldi, M, Esen, Y. (2010). Analysis of mathematical tasks in Turkish elementary school mathematics textbooks. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2277–2281. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.322
Glasnovic Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: a five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003–1024. doi:10.1080/0020739x.2018.1431849
Niss, M. (1993). Assessment in mathematics education and its effects: An introduction. In M. Niss (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education. 1–30. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brändström, A. (2005). Differentiated tasks in mathematics textbooks: an analysis of the levels of difficulty. Master’s Thesis. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.
Watson, A., & De Geest, E. (2005). Principled teaching for deep progress: Improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 209-234
Kurniawan, H., Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. 2018. Developing Open-Ended Question for Surface Area and Volume of Beam. Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 157-168.
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234- 241
Love E, Pimm D. (1996). ´This is so´: a text on texts. In: Bishop AJ, Clements K, Keitel C, et al. (Ed). International handbook of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1, 371–409
Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2006). Focus on the Representation of Problem Types in Intended Curriculum: A Comparison of Selected Mathematics Textbooks from Mainland China and the United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 609–626. doi:10.1007/s10763-006-9036-9
Cicchetti, Domenic V. (1994). "Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology". Psychological Assessment. 6(4), 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
Wijaya, A., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. 2015. Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educ Stud Math, 89, 41-65. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9595-1