Exploring the usefulness of the Brief COPE in clinical and positive psychology: A discriminant content validity study

Ide Bagus Siaputra*    -  Doctoral Program in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Afinnisa Rasyida    -  Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Amanda Meuthia Ramadhanty    -  Master Program in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
Noeroel Kentjono Endah Triwijati    -  Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/pjpp.v8i1.15063
The Brief Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced (COPE) scale is widely used for measuring coping strategies. However, concerns persist regarding the dimensions captured by the scale and the accuracy of item representation. This study examined the relevance of adapted Brief COPE items using discriminant content validity (DCV). A panel of experts (n = 15) assessed the extent to which the items corresponded to their intended dimensions. Intraclass correlation (ICC) estimates ranged from 0.640 to 0.828, indicating agreement among experts. A one-sample t-test evaluated DCV, revealing that 21 out of 28 items distinctly and exclusively measured intended dimensions, confirming their discriminant content validity. Seven items were excluded: three did not measure coping strategies (non-dimension), and four measured them in different dimensions (wrong-dimension). The discriminant content-validated Brief COPE scale improves coping assessment, benefiting psychological therapies and providing researchers with refined measures for each coping strategy dimension, addressing dimensional concerns.

Keywords: discriminant content validity; coping strategies; dysfunctional coping; emotion-focused coping; problem-focused coping

  1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, J. C. on S. for E. and P. T. (U. S. ). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC : AERA.
  2. Angelica, K., Sukamto, M. E., Chandra, C. C., & Andrea, K. (2022). Coping strategies to predict the psychological well-being of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal, 19(August), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v19i2.49
  3. Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Drummond, S. (2017). Lazarus and Folkman’s Psychological Stress and Coping Theory. In The Handbook of Stress and Health. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993811.ch21
  4. Borualago, I. S., & Casas, F. (2021). Subjective Well-Being of Indonesian Children: A Perspective of Material Well-Being (Kesejahteraan Subjektif Anak Indonesia: Sebuah Perspektif Kesejahteraan Materi). ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 26(2), 204–230. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111634487-006
  5. Bose, N. C., Bjorling, G., Elfstrom, M. L., Persson, H., & Saboonchi, F. (2015). Assessment of Coping Strategies and Their Associations With Health Related Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: the Brief COPE Restructured. Cardiology Research, 6(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.14740/cr385w
  6. Bukhori, B., Ma’arif, S., Panatik, S. A. B., Siaputra, I. B., & Al Afghani, A. A. (2022). A Study on Muslim University Students in Indonesia: The Mediating Role of Resilience in the Effects of Religiosity, Social Support, Self-Efficacy on Subjective Well-being. Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal, 5(2), 152–171. https://doi.org/10.25217/igcj.v5i2.2972
  7. Carver, C. S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92–100.
  8. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, K. J. (1989). Assessing Coping Strategies: A Theoretically Based Approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
  9. Faisal, A. (2019). Pengaruh strategi coping, social support dan faktor demografis terhadap psychological well-being mahasiswa perantau Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
  10. Fredrickson, B. (2001). The Role of Positive Emotions in Positive Psychology The Broaden - and Build Theory of Positive Emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.218
  11. García, F. E., Barraza-peña, C. G., Wlodarczyk, A., Alvear-carrasco, M., & Reyes-reyes, A. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Brief-COPE for the evaluation of coping strategies in the Chilean population. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 31(22), 1–11.
  12. Hernandez, A., Hidalgo, M. ., Hambleton, R. ., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2020). International test commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390–398. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306
  13. Huda, N., Lin, Y.-K., Shaw, M. K., & Chang, H. J. (2022). Psychometric properties and cross-cultural adaptation of the Indonesian version of the Brief COPE in a sample of advanced cancer patients. Annals of Oncology, 32, S1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.683
  14. Huda, N, Yun-Yen, Deli, H., Shaw, M. K., Huang, T. W., & Chang, H. J. (2021). Mediation of Coping Strategies among Patients with Advanced Cancer. Clinical Nursing Research, 30(8), 1153–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738211003276
  15. Huda, Nurul, & Chang, H. . (2020). Coping strategies and functional status among patients with advanced cancer in Indonesia. Annals of Oncology, 31(4).
  16. International Test Commission. (2017). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed). Retrieved from www.InTestCom.org
  17. Johnston, M., Dixon, D., Hart, J., Glidewell, L., Schröder, C., & Pollard, B. (2014). Discriminant content validity: A quantitative methodology for assessing content of theory-based measures, with illustrative applications. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12095
  18. Johnston, M., & Pollard, B. (2001). Consequences of disease: testing the WHO International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) model. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 53(10), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00384-1
  19. Kamarulbahri, T. M. S. T., Ariaratnam, S., Nikmat, A. W., Abdullah, N. N., & Khing, T. L. (2022). Coping strategies and their associated factors among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia in Kuantan, Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1004034
  20. Kato, T. (2015). Frequently used coping scales: A meta-analysis. Stress and Health, 31(4), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2557
  21. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and coping (1st ed.). New York: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.
  22. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1(3), 141–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410010304
  23. Leman, H. K., & Arjadi, R. (2023). Self-Criticism in Emerging Adulthood With Adverse Childhood Experiences Increases Depression, Anxiety, and Stress [Kritik Diri Pada Dewasa Awal Dengan Pengalaman Buruk di Masa Kecil Meningkatkan Depresi, Kecemasan, dan Stres]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 38(1), 038108. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v38i1.4893
  24. Matsumoto, S., Yamaoka, K., Nguyen, H. D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Nagai, M., Tanuma, J., … Oka, S. (2020). Validation of the Brief Coping Orientation to Problem Experienced (Brief COPE) inventory in people living with HIV/AIDS in Vietnam. Global Health & Medicine, 2(6), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2020.01064
  25. Monzani, D., Steca, P., Greco, A., D’Addario, M., Cappelletti, E., & Pancani, L. (2015). The situational version of the brief COPE: Dimensionality and relationships with goal-related variables. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i2.935
  26. Peters, R. M., Solberg, M. A., Templin, T. N., & Cassidy-Bushrow, A. E. (2020). Psychometric Properties of the Brief COPE Among Pregnant African American Women. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(11), 927–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945920907686
  27. Prasetyawati, W., Rifameutia, T., Gillies, R., & Newcombe, P. (2021). The Adaptation of a Brief Adolescent Subjective Well-Being in School Scale (BASWBSS), the Student Subjective Well-Being Scale in the Indonesian Context [Adaptasi BASWBSS, Skala Kesejahteraan Subjektif Siswa dalam Konteks Indonesia]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 184–203. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v36i2.2277
  28. Putri, M. C. . (2012). Hubungan antara coping dan psychological distress pada istri yang mengalami kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.
  29. Rahman, H. A., Bani Issa, W., & Naing, L. (2021). Psychometric properties of brief-COPE inventory among nurses. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00592-5
  30. Schmitt, M. A., Schröder, C. D., Stenneberg, M. S., van Meeteren, N. L. U., Helders, P. J. M., Pollard, B., & Dixon, D. (2013). Content validity of the Dutch version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire. Manual Therapy, 18(5), 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.01.004
  31. Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
  32. Shepard, L. . (2016). Evaluating test validity: reprise and progress. Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 23, 268–280.
  33. Solberg, M. A., Gridley, M. K., & Peters, R. M. (2022). The Factor Structure of the Brief Cope: A Systematic Review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 44(6), 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459211012044
  34. Søvold, L. E., Naslund, J. A., Kousoulis, A. A., Saxena, S., Qoronfleh, M. W., Grobler, C., & Münter, L. (2021). Prioritizing the Mental Health and Well-Being of Healthcare Workers: An Urgent Global Public Health Priority. Frontiers in Public Health, 9(May), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.679397
  35. Veirman, E., van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Verleysen, G., de Paepe, A. L., & Crombez, G. (2021). What do alexithymia items measure? A discriminant content validity study of the Toronto-alexithymia-scale–20. PeerJ, 9, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11639
  36. Yeni, A. R., & Pelupessy, D. C. (2023). National Resilience in Regards to Drug Problems: The Effects of Perceived Threat and Sense of Coherence [National Resilience Dalam Masalah Narkoba: Pengaruh Perceived Threat dan Sense of Coherence]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 38(1), 038110. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v38i1.5206
  37. Yuniardi, M. S., Rodgers, J., & Freeston, M. H. (2022). Comparison of Alcohol and Cannabis Motives and Context of Use among United Kingdom Students. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 37(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v37i1.2531
  38. Yusoff, M. S. B. (2011). The Validity of the Malay Brief Cope in Identifying. International Medical Journal, International Medical Journal (March 2011), 29–33.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Psikohumaniora: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publisher:
Faculty of Psychology and Health, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Kampus III, Tambakaji Ngaliyan Semarang 50185 Central Java - Indonesia
website: fpk.walisongo.ac.id

 
Visitor Statistics
apps