Nilai Sense of Community pada Kesejahteraan Psikologis dalam Menghuni (Housing Well-being): Studi Meta-analisis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Well-being appreciates as a holistic unity of one's potential and a state where individuals can receive strengths and weaknesses, have a purpose in life, develop positive relationships that lead to personal growth wherever individuals are, especially in their neighborhoods. The shelter that spawned a housing well-being that looked at the potential benefits optimally could be likened to where he/she lived. Housing well-being requires reflective and formative as a benchmark to assess the welfare of individuals in their dwellings. Formative indicators point to the evaluation of the satisfaction of residential features, while reflective indicators look at the gap between expectations and existing in the neighborhood, one of which is in the neighboring neighborhoods that are part of the residential community. Sense of community is an early stage in the individual to see the community. Based on the map of existing research results in terms of residential satisfaction. The study used this meta-analysis strategy to examine the results of previous research on the consistency between the sense of community in shaping housing welfare. This meta-analysis study resulted that a sense of community contributing to housing welfare.
Abstrak: Kesejahteraan psikologis dijelaskan sebagai suatu pencapaian yang holistik dari potensi psikologis seseorang dan suatu keadaan ketika individu dapat menerima kekuatan maupun kelemahan, memiliki tujuan hidup, mengembangkan relasi positif yang bermuara pada pertumbuhan pribadi dimanapun individu berada, terlebih dalam lingkungan tinggalnya. Konsep kesejahteraan psikologis inipun berkembang dalam lingkup hunian yang mencetuskan perspektif kesejahteraan psikologis dalam menghuni (housing well-being) yang memandang pada pencapaian potensi secara optimal beserta fungsi psikologis positif seseorang terhadap tempat tinggalnya. Pada indikatornya, housing well-being mensyaratkan reflektif dan formatif sebagai tolak ukur untuk menilai kesejahteraan psikologis individu pada huniannya. Indikator formatif menunjuk pada evaluasi kepuasan menyeluruh fitur hunian, sementara indikator reflektif melihat pada senjang antara harapan dan kenyataan yang ada di lingkungan tinggal, salah satunya adalah kepuasan dalam bertetangga yang merupakan bagian dari komunitas tinggal. Sense of community merupakan tahap awal dalam diri individu untuk melihat komunitasnya. Berdasarkan peta penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa terdapat peran sense of community dalam housing well-being. Penelitian yang menggunakan strategi meta-analisa ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji hasil-hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan peneliti sebelumnya tentang kekonsistenan antara sense of community dalam membentuk housing well-being. Studi meta-analisis ini menghasilkan bahwa sense of community memberikan kontribusi terhadap housing well-being.
Downloads
Article Details
The copyright of the accepted article shall be assigned to the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to published articles.
In line with the license, authors and any users (readers and other researchers) are allowed to share and adapt the material only for non-commercial purposes. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, authors must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
References
Brodsky, A. E., & Marx, C. M. (2001). Layers of identity: Multiple psychological senses of community within a community setting. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6629(200103)29:2<161::AID-JCOP1011>3.0.CO;2-1
Chavis, D. M., & Pretty, G. M. H. (1999). Sense of community: Advances in measurement and application. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 635–642. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199911)27:6<635::AID-JCOP1>3.0.CO;2-F
Chavis, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00922689
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. In The Science of Well-Being (103–118). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_5
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., Shimmack, U. E., & Helliwell. (2009). Well-being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited–growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024790530822
Inserhart, M. W., & Spangle, M. (2000). Collaborative approaches to resolving conflict. London: Sage Publication.
Kahlmeier, S., Schindler, C., Grize, L., & Braun-Fahrländer, C. (2001). Perceived environmental housing quality and well-being of movers. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 55(10), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.55.10.708
Kennedy-Hendricks, A., Schwartz, H. L., Griffin, B. A., Burkhauser, S., Green, H. D., Kennedy, D. P., & Pollack, C. E. (2015). Health implications of social networks for children living in public housing. Health & Place, 36(Supplement C), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.11.001
Kumar, P., & Reddy, B. S. (2007). Ecology and human well-being. Sage Publication India Pvt Ltd.
Luhman, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Standford Univerisity Press.
McNeely, J. (1999). Community building. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(6), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(199911)27:6<74: AID-JCOP8>3.0.CO;2-V
Oswald, A. J. (1997). Happiness and economic performance. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1815–1831. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.1997.tb00085.x
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, and E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Weidemann, S., & Anderson, J. R. (1985). A conceptual framework for residential satisfaction. In I. Altman and C.H. Werner, (Eds.). In Home environment. New York: Plenum Press.