Synergizing stakeholders’ communication for religious harmony in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2023.8.1.13626Keywords:
synergizing, stakeholders, religious, harmony, Indonesia.Abstract
Inter-religious conflicts are born, among others, due to misunderstandings in receiving and interpreting messages in the process of multi-religious community interaction, without exception conflicts in Bantul Regency, Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach that is descriptive analysis with the type of case study method. The results concluded that the conflict was caused by the process of inter-religious communication that took place in a stagnant and closed manner. In the process of communication between religious communities in large numbers, there are influences in the form of differences in religious, socio-cultural, political views to diverse ideologies and involve high psychological emotions. A religious conflict resolution approach that is oriented towards a transparent model of government policy implementation and reaches all levels of society is an obligation for regional and national leaders. Then, interfaith leaders must prioritize patterns of thinking and behaving by promoting a moderate attitude that puts the human side at the main level compared to group and religious backgrounds. In addition, religious people must be able to put aside egoism and a priori attitudes in interacting with people of other religions and religious leaders are obliged to communicate messages of peace and harmony in the frame of plurality. This study contributes to the development of a communication model in interfaith conflict resolution.
***
Konflik antar umat beragama lahir antara lain disebabkan oleh kesalahpahaman dalam menerima dan menafsirkan pesan dalam proses interaksi masyarakat multi agama, tanpa terkecuali konflik di Kabupaten Bantul, Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif yang bersifat deskriptif analisis dengan jenis metode studi kasus. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa konflik tersebut disebabkan oleh proses komunikasi antar umat beragama yang berlangsung secara stagnan dan tertutup. Dalam proses komunikasi antar umat beragama dalam jumlah yang banyak tersebut, terdapat pengaruh berupa perbedaan cara pandang agama, sosial budaya, pandangan politik hingga ideologi yang beragam dan melibatkan emosi psikologis yang tinggi. Pendekatan penyelesaian konflik agama yang berorientasi pada model implementasi kebijakan pemerintah yang transparan dan menjangkau seluruh lapisan masyarakat menjadi kewajiban bagi para pemimpin daerah dan nasional. Kemudian, para pemimpin lintas agama harus mengedepankan pola berpikir dan bersikap dengan mengedepankan sikap moderat yang menempatkan sisi kemanusiaan pada tataran utama dibandingkan dengan latar belakang kelompok dan agama. Selain itu, umat beragama harus mampu mengesampingkan egoisme dan sikap apriori dalam berinteraksi dengan umat beragama lain dan para pemuka agama berkewajiban mengkomunikasikan pesan-pesan perdamaian dan kerukunan dalam bingkai kemajemukan. Studi ini berkontribusi bagi pengembangan model komunikasi dalam penyelesaian konflik antar agama.
Downloads
References
Adila, A., Santoso, P., & Hidayat, E. R. (2022). Contribution Indonesian conference on religion and peace in realizing peace inter-religious. International Journal of Arts and Social Science, 5(6), 7–11. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.ijassjournal.com/2022/V5I6/414665647.pdf
Cuevas, J. A., & Dawson, B. L. (2020). An integrated review of recent research on the relationships between religious belief, political ideology, authoritarianism, and prejudice. Psychological Reports, 124(3), 977–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120925392.
Fadilah, G. (2021). Implikasi teori-teori konflik terhadap realitas sosial masa kini: tinjauan pemikiran para tokoh sosiologi. Journal of Society and Development, 1(1), 11–15. Retrieved from https://journal.medpro.my.id/index.php/jsd/article/view/35.
Ismail, F. (2014). Dinamika kerukunan antarumat beragama: “Konflik, rekonsiliasi dan harmoni. Rosda Karya.
Hasanah, U. (2021). Dakwah in the study of religious moderation. Alfuad: Jurnal Sosial Keagamaan, 5(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.31958/jsk.v5i1.3188.
Hidayati, T., & Kurniawan, W. (2021). Stability analysis of Lotka-Volterra model in the case of interaction of local religion and official religion. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 2(3), 542–546. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v2i3.97.
Jailani, M., Dewantara, J. A., & Rahmani, E. F. (2021). The awareness of mutual respect post-conflicts: Ethnic Chinese strategy through social interaction and engagement in West Kalimantan. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 33 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1990170.
Koehrsen, J. (2021). Muslims and climate change: How Islam, Muslim organizations, and religious leaders influence climate change perceptions and mitigation activities. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 12(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.702.
Kumar, M. (2022). Moving beyond faith: Muslim Jogis and religious conversion in north India. Contemporary South Asia, 1–18. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2022.2113036.
Lähdesmäki, T., Baranova, J., Ylönen, S. C., Koistinen, A.-K., Mäkinen, K., Juškiene, V., & Zaleskiene, I. (2022). Learning cultural literacy through creative practices in schools : Cultural and multimodal approaches to meaning-making. Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/s/xybxodt8ok8bz2u/978-3-030-89236-4.pdf?dl=0.
Arsyam, M., Zakirah, Z., & Ibrahim, S. (2021). Transmigration village and construction of religious harmony: Evidences from Mamasa of West Sulawesi. Al-Ulum, 21(1), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v21i1.2112.
Pamungkas, C., & Indriasari, D. T. (2021). Preventing religious conflict in Papua land: Adopting cultural traditions of peacebuilding. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 9(2), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.18588/202108.00a119.
Rahman, U., Subair, M., Muslim, A., Kila, S., & Sadli, M. (2021). Religious and cultural moderation of Ambonese society post-1999 conflict. Linguistica Antverpiensia, 2021(2), 2225–2243.
Regus, M. (2020). Interreligious conflicts in post-authoritarian Indonesia: Assumptions, causes, and implications. Jurnal Politik, 5(2), 199. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v5i2.267.
Resnyansky, L., Smith, C., Taylor, C., Sulistiyanto, P., Merryman, G., & Mujahiduddin. (2022). Reasons behind reasons: A communitarian reading of women’s radicalization and family bombings in Southeast Asia. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2022.2034229.
Ridho, A. (2021). Syari’at Islam dan dilema daulah islamiyah (Indonesia cerminan negara Madinah). Mudabbir: Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 2(2), 109–131. https://journal.uinmataram.ac.id/index.php/mudabbir/article/view/4138.
Ridho, M. R., & Tumin, T. (2022). Multicultural education: Effort in overcoming problems of cultural conflict in Indonesia. Qalamuna: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 14(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v14i1.1187.
Schmidt, L. (2021). Aesthetics of authority: ‘Islam Nusantara’ and Islamic ‘radicalism’ in Indonesian film and social media. Religion, 51(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1868387.
Setiawan, T., De Jong, E. B. P., Scheepers, P. L. H., & Sterkens, C. J. A. (2021). Support for interreligious conflict in Indonesia: Tests of theories on interethnic threat and distrust versus contact. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1834490921993295.
Suherman, A., Putra, M. R. A., & Mansur. (2020). Identity politic contestation in the public sphere: A steep road of democracy in Indonesia. 436, 227–230. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200529.046.
Sutisna, S., Prasetya, E. E., & Yono, Y. (2021). Kepemimpinan non-muslim dalam perspektif Imam Al-Mawardi (kajian literatur kitab Al-Ahkam As-Sulthaniyyah). DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 19(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v19i1.1984.
Syah, I. (2022). Pola interaksi pedagang muslim dan non muslim dalam mendorong sikap toleransi di pasar Besehati Kota Manado. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 8(1), 781–785. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v8i1.2855.
Ushama, T. (2021). Islamophobia in India during the covid-19 crisis: A surge of stigmatization, vilification and murder. Al-Shajarah, 26(1), 71–98. Retrieved from https://journals.iium.edu.my/shajarah/index.php/shaj/article/view/1227.
Vyborny, K. (2021). Persuasion and Public Health: Evidence from An Experiment with Religious Leaders during COVID-19 in Pakistan. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3842048.
Woiwode, C., Schäpke, N., Bina, O., Veciana, S., Kunze, I., Parodi, O., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wamsler, C. (2021). Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00882-y.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles. Therefore, the author must submit a statement of the Copyright Transfer Agreement.*)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In line with the license, authors and third parties (readers, researchers, and others) are allowed to share and adapt the material only for non-commercial purposes. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicated if changes were made. If authors and third parties (readers, researchers, and others) remix, transform or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
*) Authors whose articles are accepted for publication will receive confirmation via email to send a Copyright Transfer Agreement.