From Marketplace to Parliament: Converting Digital Business Capital into Political Agency among Indonesian Female Candidates

Hendika Dwinanda Wicaksana; Budi Setiyono; Rina Martini; Hapsari Dwiningtyas Sulistyani; Deanda Dewindaru; Ade Indriani Siagian; Agnes Monica Marpaung; Fitria Hani Aprina; Moh. Yamin Darsyah

doi:10.21580/sa.v21i1.31225

Authors

Hendika Dwinanda Wicaksana Doctoral Program in Social Science, Department of Political and Governance Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia; Department of Political Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8943-4899
Budi Setiyono Doctoral Program in Social Science, Department of Political and Governance Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-0304
Rina Martini Doctoral Program in Social Science, Department of Political and Governance Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9978-6325
Hapsari Dwiningtyas Sulistyani Doctoral Program in Social Science, Department of Political and Governance Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4526-4248
Deanda Dewindaru Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7879-2291
Ade Indriani Siagian Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4126-3805
Agnes Monica Marpaung Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1126-264X
Fitria Hani Aprina Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2177-2155
Moh. Yamin Darsyah Doctoral Program in Bussiness Administration, Conrado Benitez Institute for Business Education, Philipine Women’s University, Manila, Philippines https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-0509

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v21i1.31225

Keywords:

algorithmic campaigning, capital conversion, digital politics, mompreneur politician, patriarchal bargaining

Abstract

The 2024 Indonesian General Election saw a surge of “Mompreneur-Politicians”- female candidates who leveraged their micro-entrepreneurial background to boost their electoral appeal. This study employs a netnographic analysis of TikTok and Instagram to explore how they operate within the digital attention economy. Drawing upon Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of capital conversion and Deniz Kandiyoti’s concept of patriarchal bargaining, it argues that the Mompreneur identity converts commercial credibility into political trust. The findings suggest a “algorithmic campaigning” approach that combines soft-sell business stories with political messaging, which leads to increased audience engagement in comparison to traditional campaigning. This strategy offers women an alternative path outside of dynastic politics, but at the same time it reproduces patriarchal norms by legitimating political ambition through domesticity and service, and it commodifies democratic citizenship through increasingly clientelist-consumerist relations between voters and politicians.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akinbode, Olufisayo, Folasade Bukola Awotayo, Gospel Akinbode, and Olusegun Nathaniel Adewusi. “A Stylistics Analysis of Niyi Osundare’s the’Leader and the Led’.” Ijinle: A Multidiciplinary Journal of the Faculty of Arts, Adeleke University 6, no. 1 (2023): 60–75. https://ijinle.adelekeuniversity.edu.ng/ijl/article/view/35.

Al-rwaidan, Rafi Mahmoud. “The Fear of Leadership: Critical Review.” Information Sciences Letters 12, no. 7 (2023): 2843–47. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120713.

Baraokar, Simantini. “Shifting from the Patriarchal Legal Model to a Cultural Feminism Model: Combating the Double Burden on Women.” International Journal of Law Management & Humanities 5, no. 6 (2022): 414–4216. https://www.ijlmh.com/wp-content/uploads/Shifting-from-the-Patriarchal-Legal-Model-to-a-Cultural-Feminism-Model.pdf?pdf=1.

Bardall, Gabrielle, Elin Bjarnegård, and Jennifer M Piscopo. “How Is Political Violence Gendered? Disentangling Motives, Forms, and Impacts.” Political Studies 68, no. 4 (2020): 916–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719881812.

Barnes, Tiffany D., and Mirya R. Holman. “Gender Quotas, Women’s Representation, and Legislative Diversity.” The Journal of Politics 82, no. 4 (2020): 1271–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/708336.

Bhakti Wiranti, Faizah Abdullah Latif, Imat Hibbatulloh, Hijriatu Sakinah, and Moh. Wildan Hidayatullah. “Political Feminism and Women’s Representation in Public Policy in Indonesia.” Jurnal Pelita Raya 1, no. 1 (2025): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.65586/jpr.v1i1.11.

Bharosa, Nitesh. “The Rise of GovTech: Trojan Horse or Blessing in Disguise? A Research Agenda.” Government Information Quarterly 39, no. 3 (2022): 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101692.

Bican, Peter M, and Alexander Brem. “Digital Business Model, Digital Transformation, Digital Entrepreneurship: Is There A Sustainable ‘Digital’?” Sustainability 12, no. 13 (2020): 5239. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135239.

Bourdieu, Pierre. “The Forms of Capital.” In Readings in Economic Sociology, 280–91. New Jersey: Wiley, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch15.

Bunting, Hannah, Jennifer Gaskell, and Gerry Stoker. “Trust, Mistrust and Distrust: A Gendered Perspective on Meanings and Measurements.” Frontiers in Political Science 3, no. 1 (2021): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642129.

Cassell, Kaitlen J. “When ‘Following’ the Leader Inspires Action: Individuals’ Receptivity to Discursive Frame Elements on Social Media.” Political Communication 38, no. 5 (2021): 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1829761.

Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368.

Firdaus, Firdaus, and Ratih Agustin Wulandari. “Implications of Low Women’s Representation: Strategies and Challenges Towards Gender Equality in Indonesian Politics.” Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society 5, no. 2 (2023): 138–53. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v5i2.383.

Funke, Manuel, Moritz Schularick, and Christoph Trebesch. “Populist Leaders and the Economy.” American Economic Review 113, no. 12 (2023): 3249–88. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20202045.

Hafel, Muhlis. “Digital Transformation in Politics and Governance in Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges in the Era of Technological Disruption.” Society 11, no. 2 (2023): 742–57. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.577.

Harff, Darian, and Desiree Schmuck. “Influencers as Empowering Agents? Following Political Influencers, Internal Political Efficacy and Participation among Youth.” Political Communication 40, no. 2 (2023): 147–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2166631.

Hessami, Zohal, and Mariana Lopes da Fonseca. “Female Political Representation and Substantive Effects on Policies: A Literature Review.” European Journal of Political Economy 63 (2020): 101896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101896.

Kahl, Peter. Redefining Democracy for the Age of AI: AI Governance and the Fiduciary Turn in the Architecture of Knowledge. St. Edmunds: Lex et Ratio Ltd., 2025.

Kandiyoti, Deniz. “Bargaining with Patriarchy.” Gender & Society 2, no. 3 (1988): 274–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004.

Kusche, Isabel. “The Old in the New: Voter Surveillance in Political Clientelism and Datafied Campaigning.” Big Data & Society 7, no. 1 (2020): 205395172090829. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720908290.

Lee, Alexander. “Does Affirmative Action Work? Evaluating India’s Quota System.” Comparative Political Studies 54, no. 9 (2021): 1534–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021989755.

Lewis, Patricia, Nick Rumens, and Ruth Simpson. “Postfeminism, Hybrid Mumpreneur Identities and the Reproduction of Masculine Entrepreneurship.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 40, no. 1 (2022): 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211013791.

Makola, Zamandlovu Sizile. “Mumpreneurs’ Experiences of Combining Motherhood and Entrepreneurship: A Netnographic Study.” Journal of Contemporary Management 19, no. si1 (2022): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.35683/jcm20129.139.

Malodia, Suresh, Amandeep Dhir, Mahima Mishra, and Zeeshan Ahmed Bhatti. “Future of E-Government: An Integrated Conceptual Framework.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173 (2021): 121102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121102.

McKean, Anna E., and Brayden G. King. “When Ideologies Align: Progressive Corporate Activism and Within‐firm Ideological Alignment.” Strategic Management Journal 45, no. 12 (2024): 2459–2518. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3632.

Mikkelsen, Maria Falk, and Mikkel Giver Kjer. “Autonomy Is Taken, Not given: The Role of Public Leader Networking in Shaping Perceived Managerial Autonomy.” Public Performance & Management Review 48, no. 5 (2025): 1114–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2025.2517654.

Mohd Fathir, Mohd Firdauz, Anitawati Mohd Lokman, Shamsiah Abd Kadir, and Ismail Sualman. “Social Media Visual Framing towards Political Participation: An Analysis on BERSIH 2.0.” Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication 38, no. 2 (2022): 127–43. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3802-08.

Muallidin, Isnaini. “Algorithmic Governance and the New Face of Exclusion: A Digital Structural Violence Framework for Critiquing Techno-solutionist Social Policies.” Telecommunications Policy 50, no. 6 (2026): 103225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2026.103225.

Nastoska, Aleksandra, Bojana Jancheska, Maryan Rizinski, and Dimitar Trajanov. “Evaluating Trustworthiness in AI: Risks, Metrics, and Applications Across Industries.” Electronics 14, no. 13 (2025): 2717. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14132717.

Peña, Alejandro M, and Tomás Gold. “The Party-on-the-Net: The Digital Face of Partisan Organization and Activism.” Information, Communication & Society 26, no. 16 (2023): 3257–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2147399.

Pich, Christopher, and Bruce I. Newman. “Evolution of Political Branding: Typologies, Diverse Settings and Future Research.” Journal of Political Marketing 19, no. 1–2 (2020): 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2019.1680932.

Pietroni, Eva. “Multisensory Museums, Hybrid Realities, Narration, and Technological Innovation: A Discussion around New Perspectives in Experience Design and Sense of Authenticity.” Heritage 8, no. 4 (2025): 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8040130.

Rokka, Joonas. “Netnographic Inquiry and New Translocal Sites of the Social.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 34, no. 4 (2010): 381–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00877.x.

Roos, Annie. “Using Netnography to Explore the Entrepreneurship Process.” The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/14657503251341791.

Sanches, Eva, and Célia M.Q. Ramos. “Evaluating the Impact of Instagram Engagement Metrics on Corporate Revenue Growth: Introducing the Loyalty Rate.” Information 16, no. 4 (2025): 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040287.

Shamayleh, Ghalia, and Zeynep Arsel. “Digital Affective Encounters: The Relational Role of Content Circulation on Social Media.” Edited by Markus Giesler and Julien Cayla. Journal of Consumer Research 52, no. 5 (2026): 914–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaf023.

Smith, Jessica C. “Politics and Parenthood: An Examination of UK Party Leadership Elections.” Parliamentary Affairs 71, no. 1 (2018): 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx016.

Šola, Hedda Martina, Fayyaz Hussain Qureshi, and Sarwar Khawaja. “Human-Centred Design Meets AI-Driven Algorithms: Comparative Analysis of Political Campaign Branding in the Harris–Trump Presidential Campaigns.” Informatics 12, no. 1 (2025): 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics12010030.

Stephen, S. “Political Science: Method and Theory.” International Political Science 74, no. 1 (2024): 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208345241232770.

Tapsell, Ross. “Social Media and Elections in Southeast Asia: The Emergence of Subversive, Underground Campaigning.” Asian Studies Review 45, no. 1 (2021): 117–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1841093.

Tavares, Antonio F., and Nuno F. da Cruz. “Explaining the Transparency of Local Government Websites through a Political Market Framework.” Government Information Quarterly 37, no. 3 (2020): 101249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.08.005.

Verbytska, Anna, Iryna Lysenko, Larysa Babachenko, and Nataliia Kraskivska. “Inclusive Social Marketing: Representation and Diversity in Brand Campaigns.” Marketing and Branding Research 10, no. 1 (2023): 45–58. https://doi.org/10.32038/mbr.2023.10.01.04.

Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, Maria Petrova, and Ruben Enikolopov. “Political Effects of the Internet and Social Media.” Annual Review of Economics 12, no. 1 (2020): 415–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239.