Development of STEM - Project Based Learning Devices to Train 4C Skills of Students

Kurniahtunnisa Kurniahtunnisa*    -  Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia
Ester Caroline Wowor  -  Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Manado, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Supp. File(s): Data Analysis
The study aims to describe the validity, applicability, and effectiveness of the developed learning aids. This research is a research and development (R&D) research that uses the Borg and Gall model. The subjects of the wide-scale trial were 106 students of class XI at SMAN 16 Semarang. The data analysis used was descriptive percentages.  The results and conclusions of this study indicate that: (1) overall learning aids are highly valid based on expert validation, and construct validity, especially for tests of critical thinking skills obtained valid and reliable results (2) learning aids are well implemented; (3) learning aids effectively improve students' critical thinking skills with >75% of students meeting the minimum completion criteria, and regarding N-gain test, there is an increase in critical thinking skills with moderate criteria.  The STEM-PjBL Learning aids effectively trains the ability to think creatively, communicatively and collaboratively with high criteria.

Supplement Files

Keywords: Learning aids; PjBL; STEM

  1. Bariyah, L., Budiono, J. D., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2014). Analisis Kesesuaian RPP dan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Guru SMP di Kabupaten Mojokerto pada Sub Materi Fotosintesis dengan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal BioEdu - Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi UNESA, 3(3), 453–460.
  2. BNSP. (2014). Instrumen Penilaian Buku Teks Tahun 2014. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
  3. Borg, W.R. & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction. Longman.
  4. Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics. In Nordic Research in Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, Issue November). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47211-2
  5. Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Morgan, J. R. (2013). STEM project-based learning an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach. In STEM Project-Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6
  6. Cresswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
  7. Crowder, R. M., & Zauner, K. P. (2013). A Project-Based Biologically-Inspired Robotics Module. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2215862
  8. Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Direktorat Jendral Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
  9. Ejiwale, J. A. (2015). Barriers to Successful Implementation of STEM Education. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24436-5_20
  10. El-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM Integration in Schools: Views from In-Service Science Teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2459–2484. https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01235A
  11. Furi, L. M. I., Handayani, S., & Maharani, S. (2018). Eksperimen Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Dan Project Based Learning Terintegrasi Stem Untuk Mengingkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Kreativitas Siswa Pada Kompetensi Dasar Teknologi Pengolahan Susu. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(1), 49-60–60. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v35i1.13886
  12. Han, S., Yalvae, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
  13. Husin, W. N. F. W., Arsad, N. M., Othman, O., Rasul, M. S., Osman, K., & Iksan, Z. (2016). Fostering Students’ 21st Century Skills through Project Oriented Problem Based Learning (POPBL) in Integrated STEM Education Program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1).
  14. Ismayani, A. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan STEM Project - Based Learning terhadap Kreativitas Matematis Siswa SMK. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 3(4), 264–272. https://doi.org/2407-8530
  15. Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students In STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
  16. Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
  17. Kumar.R, R., & James, R. (2015). Evaluation of Critical Thinking in Higher Education in Oman. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n3p33
  18. Kurniahtunnisa, Anggraito, Y. U., & Ridlo, S. (2020). Validity and Practicality of STEM PjBL Learning Tools for Respiratory System Material. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 443(International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (Iset 2019)), 711–714. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.145
  19. Kurniahtunnisa, Kusuma Dewi, N., & Rahayu Utami, N. (2016). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Materi Sistem Ekskresi. Journal of Biology Education, 5(3), 50229. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujbe
  20. Luthvitasari, N., Putra, N. M. D., & Linuwih, S. (2012). Implementasi Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, Berpikir Kreatif dan Kemahiran Generik Sains. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2), 41–49.
  21. Mahasneh, A. M., & Alwan, A. F. (2018). The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Student Teacher Self-efficacy and Achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11335a
  22. Milla, D., A.W., J., & H., S. (2019). The Effectiveness Project Based Learning for Biology Class in Developing the Processing Skills and Creativity of High School Students. Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(1), 25–30.
  23. Munawaroh, R., Rusilowati, A., & Fianti. (2018). Improving Scientific and Creativity through Project Based Learning. Physics Communication, 2(2), 85–93.
  24. Nesusin, N., Intrarakhamhaeng, P., Supadol, P., Piengkes, N., & Poonpipathana, S. (2014). Development of Lesson Plans by the Lesson Study Approach for the 6 th Grade Students in Social Study Subject Based on Open Approach Innovation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1411–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.407
  25. Nugroho, O. F., Permanasari, A., & Firman, H. (2019). The movement of stem education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i3.19252
  26. Nuswowati, M., Binadja, A., Soeprodjo, & Ifada, K. E. N. (2010). Pengaruh Validitas dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal Ulangan Akhir Semester Bidang Studi Kimia terhadap Pencapaian Kompetensi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 4(1), 566–573.
  27. Papa-Gusho, L., & Biçaku-Çekrezi, R. (2015). Factors that Affect Effective Planning Skills of the Teacher in the Classrooms. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(3), 560–564. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2015.v4n3s1p560
  28. Papanikolaou, K., & Boubouka, M. (2010). Promoting Collaboration in a Learning Context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 135–155.
  29. Pedrosa-de-Jesus, H., Moreira, A., Lopes, B., & Watts, M. (2014). So much more than just a list: Exploring the nature of critical questioning in undergraduate sciences. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.902811
  30. Prabowo, C. A., & Ariani, N. L. (2018). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Komunikasi Oral Mahasiswa Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Think Pair Share. BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 9(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.24127/bioedukasi.v9i1.1384
  31. Putri, Y. A., & Zulyusri. (2022). Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Model Project Based Learning Terhadap. Bioeduca: Journal of Biology Education, 4(2), 1–11. http://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/bioeduca
  32. Ravitz, J., & Blazevski, J. (2014). Assessing the Role of Online Technologies in Project-based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 8(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1410
  33. Rochmawati, A., Wiyanto, & Ridlo, S. (2020). Analysis of 21 st Century Skills of Student on Implementation Project Based Learning and Problem Posing Models in Science Learning. Journal of Primary Education, 9(1), 58–67.
  34. Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., Susilowati, E. S. M., Mustika, T., Harfiyani, N., & Prabowo, H. T. (2018). The development of scientific literacy assessment to measure student’s scientific literacy skills in energy theme. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012046
  35. Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2018). Preservice Teachers’ Experiences of STEM Integration: Challenges and Implications for Integrated STEM Teacher Preparation. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9
  36. Sambada, D. (2012). Peranan Kreativitas Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Dalam Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 2(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v2n2.p37-47
  37. Santos, L. F. (2017). The Role of Critical Thinking in Science Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(20), 159–173.
  38. Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing Teacher Education and Professional Development Needs for The Implementation of Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
  39. Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-8
  40. Soros, P., Ponkham, K., & Ekkapim, S. (2018). The results of STEM education methods for enhancing critical thinking and problem solving skill in physics the 10th grade level. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1923. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019536
  41. Sulistiyowati, S., Abdurrahman, A., & Jalmo, T. (2018). The Effect of STEM-Based Worksheet on Students’ Science Literacy. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v3i1.2141
  42. Sumarni, W. (2015). The Strengths and Weakness of the Implementaion of Project Based Learning. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(3), 478–484. https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v4i3/SUB152023.pdf
  43. Toto, T., Yulisma, L., & Amam, A. (2021). Improving teachers’ understanding and readiness in implementing stem through science learning simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i2.27509
  44. Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass.
  45. Zhou, C. (2012). Integrating Creativity Training into Problem and Project-Based Learning Curriculum in Engineering Education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 488–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.714357

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Bioeduca : Journal of Biology Education
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Bioeduca: Journal of Biology Education
Published by Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 812-2359-1990
Website: https://journal.walisongo.ac.id/index.php/BIOEDUCA/index
Email: [email protected]

ISSN: 2714-8009 (Print)
ISSN: 2715-7490 (Online)


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

apps