Effectiveness of the IDEAL Problem Solving Model Based onOpen-Ended Questions onthe Creative Thinking Skills of Grade VII Students
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
The ability to think creatively plays important role in students’self development in the 21st century. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the IDEAL Problem Solving learning model based on open-ended questions on students' creative thinking abilities. This study is a quantitative quasi-experimental study with a Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The subjects of this research were class VII students of SMP Negeri 3 Kartasura which consisted of 64 students. Clusters random sampling was used as the sampling method. Data collection was carried out using test techniques in the form of pretest and posttest as well as non-test techniques in the form of observation and documentation. Analysis of the research data was carried out by normality test, homogeneity test, independent sample t-test and n-Gain test with the help of SPSS 23. The hypothesis test with the independent sample t-test showed the number 0.000, which means H0 was rejected and H1 was accepted, meaning that the IDEAL Problem Solving learning model is effective increasing student’s creative thinking. Skills. The n-gain test in the experimental class was 0,56 (effective enough), while in the control class the n-gain percentage was 0,08 (ineffective) where the experimental class used the IDEAL Problem Solving model so that it can be concluded that the IDEAL Problem Solving Model quite effective in improving the creative thinking skills of class VII students at SMP Negeri 3 Kartasura in the subject matter of Science Objects and Its Observations.
Keywords: Learning Model, IDEAL Problem Solving, Creative Thinking
Kemampuan berpikir kreatif berperan penting dalam pengembangan diri siswa pada abaf 21. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving berbasis soal open-ended terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif kuasi eksperimen dengan rancangan pretest-posttest control group design. Subyek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 3 Kartasura yang teridiri dari 64 siswa. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan menggunakan cluster random sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan teknik tes berupa pre-test dan post-test dan teknik non-test berupa observasi dan dokumentasi. Analisis data penelitian dilakukan dengan uji normalitas, uji homogentitas, uji independent sample t-test dan uji n-Gain dengan bantuan SPSS 23. Uji hipotesis dengan independent sample t-test sebesar 0,000 yang berarti H0 ditolak dan H1 diterima, artinya model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Uji n-gain kelas eksperimen sebesar 0,56 (cukup efektif), sedangkan kelas kontrol persentase n-gain sebesar 0,08 (tidak efektif) dimana kelas eksperimen menggunakan model IDEAL Problem Solving sehingga memberikan keismpulan bahwa Model IDEAL Problem Solving cukup efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas VII di SMP Negeri 3 Kartasura pada materi Objek IPA dan Pengamatannya.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in PHENOMENON.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Alkiyumi, M. T. M. (2010). Creative Thinking and Problem Solving Abilities: Their Relathionsip With Psychological Traits Among 10th-grade Student in Oman. Thesisi, 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018
Anggraini, E., & Zulkardi, Z. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Mem-posing Masalah menggunakan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.1857Arends, & Kilcher. (2010). Teaching for Student Learning. New York: Routledge.
Arini, W. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Materi Cahaya Siswa Kelas Delapan Smp Xaverius Kota Lubuklinggau. Science and Physics Education Journal (SPEJ), 1(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.31539/spej.v1i1.41
Balulu, N., & Jum, R. M. (2020). Model IDEAL Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kreativitas Siswa Kelas X MIA MAN 1 Kota Ternate Pada Konsep Gerak Lurus Dengan Kecepatan dan Percepatan Konstan. EDUKASI, 18(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.33387/Edu
Birgili, B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253Bransford, & Stein. (1993). The IDEAL Problem Solving: A Guide for Improving Thinking, Learning and Creativity. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Cahyono, B., Rohman, A. A., Dzakiyyah, R. I., & Setyawati, R. D. (2023). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran E-Komik Berbasis Etnomatematika Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Pada Materi Geometri MTs. AKSIOMA: JurnalProgram Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 2283–2295. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.7398
Cropley, D. H., & Patston, T. J. (2019). Supporting Creative Teaching and Learning in the Classroom: Myths, Models, and Measures, 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_15
Diki, D. (2013). Creativity for Learning Biology in Higher Education. Lux, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5642/lux.201303.03Elfiani, F. (2017). Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas Vii F Mts Ma’Arif Nu 1 Wangon Melalui Pembelajaran Ideal Problem Solving. AlphaMath Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 27.http://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/alphamath/
Elma. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Fisika Peserta Didik. Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v6i1.1201
Kartina, A. A., Suciati, S., & Harlita, H. (2021). Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Smp Kelas Viii Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Pada Materi Zat Aditif Dan Adiktif Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Quantum: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains, 12(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v12i2.10364
Kiraga, F. (2023). Literature Review : Efforts To Improve Creative Thinking Ability In Science Learning. Integrated Science Educational Journal, 4(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.330
Kivunja, C. (2015). Exploring the Pedagogical Meaning and Implications of the 4Cs “Super Skills” for the 21<sup>st</sup> Century through Bruner’s 5E Lenses of Knowledge Construction to Improve Pedagogies of the New Learning Paradigm. Creative Education, 06(02), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.62021
Kurniasih, E. (2021). Implementasi Model IDEAL Problem Solving Berbantuan Media “Beko” Untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Materi Keliling dan Luas Lingkaran Siswa Kelas VI Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar (JRPD), 2(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.30595/jrpd.v2i1.9540
Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Developing High-Level Thinking. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3, 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811252617_0009Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1514215
Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Mursidik, E. M., Samsiyah, N., & Rudyanto, H. E. (2015). Creative Thinking Ability in Solving Open-Ended Mathematical Problems Viewed From the Level of Mathematics Ability of Elementary School Students. PEDAGOGIA: Journal of Education, 4(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v4i1.69
Nugroho, G. A., Prayitno, B. A., & Ariyanto, J. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Melalui Penerapan Project Based Learning Pada Materi Pencemaran dan Daur Ulang Limbah.Bio-Pedagogi, 6(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v6i2.20692
Nurdiana, H., Sajidan, & Maridi. (2020). Creative thinking skills profile of junior high school students in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022049
OECD. (2018). Pendidikan di Indonesia Belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang KEMENDIKBUD, (021), 1–206. Retrieved from http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/16742
Prasetyawan, E., & Gunawan, H. I. (2020). Pengembangan LKS Matematika Saintifik SMP Kelas VIII Berbasis Multiple Intelligences Gardner. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 914–925. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.329
Qomariyah, N. D., & Subekti, H. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif: Studi Eksplorasi Siswa Di SMPN 62 Surabaya. Pensa E-Jurnal : Pendidikan Sains, 9(2), 242–246.https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/38250
Sari, M. W., Poedjiastoeti, S., & Taufikurohmah, T. (2017). Improvement Students ’ Creative Thinking Skills Through The Implementation of Problem Solving Model. International Conference on Science Education (ICoSEd), 209–214. Retrieved from http://icosed.conferene.unesa.ac.id/improvement-students-creative-thinking-skills-through-the-implementation-of-problem-solving-model/
Schunk, D., Acuña, M. H., Ogilvie, K. W., Baker, D. N., Curtis, S. A., Fairfield, D. H., & Mish, W. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson(Vol. 71). New York: Pearson Education Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751323
Şener, N., Türk, C., & Taş, E. (2015). Improving Science Attitude and Creative Thinking through Science Education Project: A Design, Implementation and Assessment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.771
Seyhan, H. G. (2015). The Effects of Problem Solving Applications on the Development of Science Process Skills, Logical Thinking Skills and Perception on Problem Solving Ability in The Science Laboratory. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 1–31. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effects-of-Problem-Solving-Applications-on-the Seyhan/075dedf9684d6517a9913ff15d97371ec83bedf8#citing-papers
Silver, E.A. (1997). Fostering Creativity Through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Problem Posing. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 29(3), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
Soh, K. (2016). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
Srikoon, S., Bunterm, T., Nethanomsak, T., & Ngang, T. K. (2017). A comparative study of the effects of the neurocognitive-based model and the conventional model on learner attention, working memory and mood. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2017.14.1.4
Suci, Y. T. (2018). Examining Vygotsky’s Theory and Social Interdependence as The Theory ofthe Theory in the Implementation of Cooperative Learning in Primary Schools.
NATURALISTIC: Journal of Education Research and Learning Studies, 3(1), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v3i1.269
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tep, P., Maneewan, S., Chuathong, S., & Easter, M. A. (2018). A Review of Influential Factors Affecting Undergraduate Students’ Creative Thinking. SSRN Electronic Journal, (January). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3303354
Torrance, E. P., Pearl, J., Torrance, E., & Ellen, M. (1974). Test of Creative Thinking. Lexington: Ginn.Ülger, K. (2017). The Relationship between Creative Thinking and Critical Thinking Skills of Students. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 31(4), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016018493
Wang, S., Zhang, X., & Martocchio, J. (2011). Thinking outside of the box when the box is missing: Role ambiguity and its linkage to creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.595661
Widyantari, N. D., Manuaba, I. B. S., & Sujana, I. W. (2014). Pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dan Motivasi Berprestasi Berpengaruh Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V. Jurnal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2(1), 1–12.https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v2i1.3003
Zhou, C., & Valero, P. (2015). A Comparison of Creativity in Project Groups in Science and Engineering Education in Denmark and China. Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8