Analysis of The Effect of Gender on High School Students' Misconceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/jec.2023.5.2.14997Keywords:
chemical bond, gender, misconceptionsAbstract
Misconceptions are a problem always faced in education, one of which is in the field of science, especially in chemistry. One of the chemical materials that students consider pretty challenging to understand because it is abstract, making it possible for misconceptions to occur, is chemical bonding. Misconceptions among students need to be identified quickly so they can be addressed immediately so they do not interfere with further learning. This research aims to determine the relationship between gender and the misconceptions of SMA YPK in Merauke Regency regarding chemical bonding material. Research data was analyzed quantitatively descriptively using the Polytomus Rasch Model. The respondents in this study were 76 Class X high school students who were selected using simple random sampling with 46 female and 30 male students. The research results showed that male students' average percentage of misconceptions was 31.9% (medium category), and female students were 18.6% (low type). The question indicators show that the highest percentage of misconceptions is in the question indicator for determining valence electrons; male students are 60% (medium category), and female students are 49% (medium type). Based on the overall misconception results regarding chemical bond indicators, gender influences the level of misconceptions of high school students in the city of Merauke.Downloads
References
Afifah, I. M., Irwandi, D., & Murniati, D. 2021. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Terhadap Konsep Larutan Penyangga Dengan Menggunakan Instrumen Tes Diagnostic Four-Tier Multiple Choice. JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 11(1), 27–34.
Ali, M. 2019. Analisis miskonsepsi Siswa Berdasarkan Gender dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Dengan Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier di Kotabaru. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(1), 59–66.
Antari, W. D., Sumarni, W., Harjito, & Basuki, J. 2020. Model Instrumen Test Diagnostik Two Tiers Choice untuk Analisis Miskonsepsi Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(1), 2536–2546.
Arikunto, S. 2022. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Jilid 3. PT Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.
Barke, H.-D., Hazari;, & Yitbarek. 2009. Misconceptions in Chemistry. In Springer.
Drastisianti, A., Wijayati, N., & Susilaningsih, E. 2018. Identification of Misconceptions on Buffer Material Using Three-Tier Test in the Learning of Multiple Representation. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 7(1), 95–100.
Effendy. 2013. Teori VSEPR, Kepolaran, dan Gaya Antar Molekul, Edisi 3. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
. 2016. Ilmu Kimia, Edisi 1. Malang: Indonesian Academic Publishing.
Fahmi, & Irhasyuarna, Y. 2017. The Misconceptions of Senior High School Students in Banjarmasin on Chemical Bonding. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(17), 32–39.
Fajri, A. Y. R., Agung, S., & Saridewi, N. 2020. Penggunaan Instrumen Diagnostik Two-Tier untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Asam Basa Siswa SMA dan MA. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 6(1), 101.
Firmanti, P. 2017. Penalaran Siswa Laki-laki dan Perempuan dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 1(2), 73–85.
Glaze, A. L. 2018. Education Sciences Teaching and Learning Science in the 21st Century : Challenging Critical Assumptions in Post-Secondary Science. 1997, 1–8.
Haralambos, M., & Holborn, H. 2014. Sociology: Themes and Perspectives 8th Edition.
Islami, D., Suryaningsih, S., Bahriah, E. S., Studi, P., Kimia, P., Islam, U., Syarif, N., & Selatan, K. T. 2018. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia. 9(1), 21–29.
Izza, R. I., Nurhamidah, & Elvinawati. 2021. Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Esai Berbantuan CRI(Certainty of Response Index) pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa. OLOTROP, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Kimia, 5(1), 55–63.
Kristyasari, M. L., Yamtinah, S., Utomo, S. B., Ashadi, & Indriyanti, N. Y. 2018. Gender Differences in Students’ Science Literacy Towards Learning on Integrated Science Subject. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1).
Kristyasari, M. L. & Kusumaningrum, I. A. 2023. Analysis of Misconceptions in View of Gender Differences in Chemistry Learning. Paedagogia, 26(1), 1–9.
Kusumaningrum, I. A., & Kristyasari, M. L. 2022. Misconceptions About Buffer Solutions. Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(2), 99–108.
Özmen, H. 2004. Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry: A literature Review of Chemical Bonding. J. Sci. Educ. Technol., 13, 147.
Permatasari, M. B., Muchson, M., Hakimah, N., Rokhim, D. A., Herunata, H., & Yahmin, M. 2022. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia pada Siswa SMA Menggunakan Tes Three Tier Berbasis Web. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 16(1), 1–7.
Pongkendek, J. J., & Kristyasari, M. L. 2021. Penggunaan Two Tier Multiple Choice Untuk Analisis Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa. QUANTUM: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Sains. 13(1), 131–139.
Qurrota, A., & Nuswowati, M. 2018. Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan CRI (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1),
Relawati, R. 2021. Konsep dan Aplikasi Penelitian Gender. Magetan: CV Muara Indah.
Satriana, T., Yamtinah, S., Ashadi, & Indriyanti, N. Y. 2018. Student’s profile of misconception in chemical equilibrium. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1).
Sears, D. O., Freedman, J. L., & Peplau, L. A. 2015. Psikologi Sosial Jilid Pertama Edisi Kelima. Edisi Kelima. Terjemahan Michael Adryanto & Saviti Soekrisno Jakarta: Erlangga
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. 2015. Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. In Aplikasi Pemodelan Rasch pada Assessment Pendidikan. Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Suparno, P. 2013. Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Pendidikan Fisika. Grasindo: Jakarta.
Supiah, Y. L, I., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Aloysius, H. P. 2017. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Konsep Kimia dan Upaya Mengatasinya Melalui Chemistry Clinic Bagi Pada Guru Anggota MGMP Kimia. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA Dan Pendidikan MIPA, 1(2), 114–118.
Suyono, S. 2020. Miskonsepsi kimia, sebuah misteri. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 5(1), 1–7.
Utami, R. D., Agung, S., & Bahriah, E. S. 2017. Analisis Pengaruh Gender Terhadap Miskonsepsi Siswa SMAN Di Kota Depok dengan Menggunakan Tes Diagnostik Two-Tier. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP UNTIRTA, 93–102.
Vrabec, M., & Prokša, M. 2016. Identifying Misconceptions Related to Chemical Bonding Concepts in the Slovak School System Using the Bonding Representations Inventory as a Diagnostic Tool. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(8), 1364–1370.
Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., & Shidiq, A. S. 2017. Gender Differences in Students ’ Attitudes Toward Science : An Analysis of Students ’ Science Process Skill using Testlet Instrument. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868, 030003.
Zannah, N., & Andriani, S. 2017. Karakteristik Intuisi Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dan Perbedaan Gender. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2, 111–119.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the received article shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
Authors are permitted to disseminate published articles by sharing the link/DOI of the article at the journal. Authors are allowed to use their articles for any legal purposes deemed necessary without written permission from the journal with an acknowledgment of initial publication to this journal.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
