Science Education Doctoral Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Dancing with Falsification: The Dynamic of Chemistry Atomistic Theories Across Centuries
This research aimed to explore the contribution of the falsification process to the progress of science in the field of atomic theory. The analysis focused on the history of atomic development and how this theory underwent a process of falsification. This research was qualitative research using a literature study with a narrative review method. The results showed that the development of a theory, including the theory of atoms, has undergone many improvements. Falsification is an essential aspect of scientific progress, especially in atomic theory, involving testing the theory through experimentation and observation to determine accuracy. In the development of atomic theory, falsification played a key role, as in Dalton's atomic theory. Although revolutionary, subsequent experiments revealed subatomic particles, resulting in the falsification of Dalton's ideas and the emergence of a more complex understanding of atomic structure. The evolution of atomic theory shows that scientific knowledge is dynamic, continuing to develop through falsification. New evidence continues to refine ideas, ensuring scientific knowledge accurately reflects the natural world. The scientific method emphasizes openness to falsification, stating that theories must be testable and can be replaced when significant evidence refutes the theory. This openness is the basis for scientific progress and a deeper understanding of the universe.
Keywords: falsification, atomic theory, chemistry
- Chang, R. 2005. Kimia Dasar: Konsep-konsep Inti, Edisi ketiga, Jilid 1 (1st ed.). Jakarta: Erlangga.
- Couvalis, G. 1997. The Philosophy of Science : Science and Objectivity. New York: Sage Publication.
- Dainton, B. 2023. The Silence of Physics. Erkenntnis, 88(5), 2207–2241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00450-5
- Fritzsche, S., Palmeri, P., & Schippers, S. 2021. Atomic Cascade Computations. Symmetry, 13(3), 520. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13030520
- Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. 2006. Writing Narrative Literature Reviews for Peer-Reviewed Journals: Secrets of the Trade. J Chiropr Med. ,5(3), 101–117.
- Hayashi, M. 2017. Quantum Information Theory Mathematical Foundation Second Edition (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. http://www.springer.com/series/8431
- Hon, G., & Goldstein, B. R. 2013. J. J. Thomson’s Plum‐Pudding Atomic Model: The Making of a Scientific Myth. Annalen Der Physik, 525(8–9). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201300732
- Kozlov, M. G. 2021a. Some Current Trends in Atomic Theory. In Symmetry, 13(8), 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13081486
- Kozlov, M. G. 2021b. Some current Trends in Atomic Theory. In Symmetry, 13(8), 1486. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13081486
- Kragh, H. 2021. Chemical and Other Aspects of Rutherford’s Nuclear Atom. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 51(3–4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/03036758.2020.1858879
- Krisna Pradana, A. 2018. Atom Si Demokritus. Jakarta: PTIQ Press.
- Lemma, A., & Belachew, W. 2022. How Worthy is Dalton’s Pursuit of Chemical Atomism for the Prospective Teachers? A case of Kotebe University of Education, Ethiopia. In Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 6(2), 138-151.
- Marsiti. 2018. Materialisme Atom Democritus, In Cara Kerja Ilmu. Jakarta: PTIQ.
- Mustofa, I. 2017. Fisika Atom sebagai Basis Filosofis Ilmu dalam Perspektif Al-Ghazali. Epistemé: Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman, 12(1), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2017.12.1.53-75
- Park, E. J., & Light, G. 2009. Identifying Atomic Structure as a Threshold Concept: Student Mental Models and Troublesomeness. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701675880
- Popper, K. R. 1963. Science as Falsification. http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/popper_falsification.html
- Riski, M. A. 2021. Teori Falsifikasi Karl Raimund Popper: Urgensi Pemikirannya dalam Dunia Akademik. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(3), 261–272.
- Salvi, P. R. 2023. Dalton’s Long Journey from Meteorology to the Chemical Atomic Theory. Substantia, 7(2), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.36253/Substantia-2126
- Sujito, S., Sunardi, S., Ma’ruf, M., & Hartini, S. 2019. Paradigma Teori Atom Lintas Waktu. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 2(1), 42–51.
- Sylvester, A., Tate, M., & Johnstone, D. 2013. Beyond Synthesis: Re-presenting Heterogeneous Research Literature. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(12), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.624633
- Ulya, I., & Abid, N. 2015. Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya terhadap Keilmuwan Islam. FIKRAH: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 3(2), 249-276.
- Wibowo, A. S. 2022. Falsifikasi menurut Karl Raimund Popper. In Cara Kerja Ilmu Filsafat dan Filsafat Ilmu. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
- Yerokhin, V. A., Patkóš, V., & Pachucki, K. 2021a. Atomic Structure Calculations of Helium with Correlated Exponential Functions. Symmetry, 13(7), 1246. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13071246
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.