The Effectiveness of Written ‘Peer Review’ Towards English 3 Students’ Writing Skill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv6i11585Keywords:
Peer review, recount, descriptive, procedure, and cause and effect textsAbstract
The writer conducted this research because the students of the non-English department, FITK UIN Semarang could not write text well. They still wrote text with random way, and they did not understand the social function, the generic structure and the language feature of the text. Using peer review in writing class, the writer intended to improve students' writing especially recount, descriptive, procedure, and cause and effect texts. The had two problems: 1). How is the implementation of ‘peer review' writing for the FITK students of 2014/2015?; 2). How is the writing improvement of FITK students of 2014/2015 after applying ‘peer review’ writing? There are some texts introduced to the FITK students. The students are expected to be able to write text. Through classroom action research implementing peer review, the students’ writing ability had been improved well.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2007). Penelitian Tindakan untuk Guru, Sekolah, dan Dosen, Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta
_________. (2008). Peneltian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
_________. (2010). Penelitian Tindakan Untuk Guru, Kepala Sekolah dan Pengawas.
Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.
Astrid, Anisa. (2015). Using Peer-Response and Teacher‟s Written Feedback Technique trough Blog in Writing II Class of English Education Study Program, Journal Vision, Vol4, No.1.
Boardman, Cynthia. A. and Frydenberg, Jia. (2008). Writing to Communicate Paragraph andEssays, USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Breuch, Kastman Lee-Ann. (2004).Virtual Peer Review Teaching and Learning about Writingin on Line Environment. USA: State University of New York Press, Albany.
Brown, H. Douglas. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, (USA: Longman
Brown, Kristine, and Hood, Susan. (1993). Writing Matters: writing skills and strategies forstudents of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bruffee in Kristi Lundstorm and Wendy Baker. (2009). "To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer‟s own writing," Journal of Second LanguageWriting 18.
Burns, Anne. (1999). Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers, UK: Cambridge University Press,
Chisholm, Richard M. (2007). Introducing Students to Peer Review of Writing, Writing Across the Curriculum. Vol. III, No.1
Coffin, Carile et al. (2005). Teaching Academic Writing: A toolkit for Higher Education. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group
Cohen, Louis et al. (2007). Research Method in Education, sixth ed. New York: Rouletdge,
Djuharie, Otong Setiawan. (2008). Genre dilengkapi 700 Soal Uji Pemahaman. Bandung: CV.Yrama Widya
Fromkin, Victoria. (1983). Introduction to Language. New York: Sanders College Publishing.
Graner in Kristi Lundstorm and Wendy Baker. (2009). “To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing," Journal of Second Language Writing 18.
Hadi, Sutrisno. (2004). Statistic Second Series, Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Hansen and Liu in Ricky Lam. (2010). A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback, TESL Canada Journal. Vol. 27, No. 2, Spring.
Hansen & Liu and Mangelsdorf in Ricky Lam. (2010). A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback, TESL Canada Journal. Vol. 27, No. 2, Spring.
Harmer, Jeremy. (2001). How to Teach English: An Introduction to the Practice Of English LLanguage Teaching. England: Addition Wesley Longman limited
_____________.(2003).How to Teach Writing. Longman: Pearson Education Limited
_____________. (2004). The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: Longman Group, Ltd, 2004), p. 17
Heaton, J.B. (1990). Classroom Testing, New York: Longman Group Inc.
Hinkel, Eli. (2004). Teaching Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary andGrammar. USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hogue, Ann. (2010). First Step in Academic Writing. Wesley, N.Y: Longman.
Hornby, A.S. (2011). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, New York: Oxford University Press.
Lam, Ricky. (2010). A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback, TESL Canada Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, Spring
Lundstorm, Kristi and Wendy Baker. (2009). "To give is better than to receive: The benefits of review to the reviewer‟s own writing," Journal of Second Language Writing 18
Marcus in Kristi Lundstorm and Wendy Baker, (2009). "To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer‟s own writing," Journal of Second LanguageWriting 18,
Min, Hui-Tzu. (2006)." The Effect of trained peer review on EFL students‟ revision types and writing quality," Journal of Second Language Writing 15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning the right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
