Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang - Indonesia
A Comparative Study on Group-Based Learning Using STAD and SGD Toward Students’ Writing Achievement of Descriptive Text
DOI: 10.21580/vjv7i12740
This study discusses a comparative study of group-based learning method between STAD and SGD toward students’ writing achievement of descriptive text on the tenth grade of SMK SalafiyahKajen in the academic year of 2017/2018. The purpose of the study was to differentiate those two methods, which were then found the appropriate method between STAD and SGD for learning writing skill. This study used a mixed method by using comparative design. The subject of this study were the students at the tenth grade of SMK SalafiyahKajen, students’ class RPL 2 and TB. The students from both of the class had different treatment which RPL 2 was treated using SGD and TB was treated using STAD. The technique of data collection was a test, observation, and documentation. The test consisted of two tests; they were pre-test and post-test. After collecting the data, it was found that the average score of pre-test of SGD group was 50.06 and for STAD group was 47.75; meanwhile, the average score of post-test of SGD group was 68.70 and for STAD group was 63.10. So, the computation of t count was 5.031, and the t table was 1.69. The t count was higher than t table, which stated that Ha was accepted. It meant that there was a significant difference between students' writing achievement which was taught by using STAD and SGD. The conclusion defined that SGD was better than STAD to be applied in learning writing.
Keywords: Small Group Discussion, Students-Team Achievement Division, Students’ Writing Achievement, Writing achievement.
- Kane, Thomas S. (2002). The Oxford Essential Guide to Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Knap, Peter & Watkins, Megan. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Australia: University of South Wales
- Mertens, Donna M. 2009. Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. 3rd edition.
- NurikaMustika. (2016). Writing Ability Improvement through Student Teams Achievement Divisions at Pirayanaw in Klonghin Wittaya School. University of Muhammadiyah Jember. ELLITEJournal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching Volume 01, No. 1
- O’Malley, J Michael &Chamot, Anna Uhl. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. USA: Cambridge University Press.
- Rahmat, Edy. (2013). Improving Student's Achievement in Descriptive Text Writing through Small Group Discussion Technique (A Quasi-Experimental Study to the Tenth Grade students of SMAN 1 SukadanaKayong Utara Regency, in the academic year 2011/2012). Tanjungpura University.
- Rusman. (2010). Model-Model Pembelajaran; Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Bandung: Rajawali press.
- Slavin, Robert E. 2008. Cooperative Learning; Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
- Umiyati. (2011). The Effectiveness of Using Small Group Interaction in Teaching Reading Comprehension; (Experimental Study at The Seventh Grade of SMP SunanBonang Tangerang), Department of English Education Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University. Jakarta.
- Warsono& Haryanto. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Assesment. Surabaya: RemajaRosdaKarya.
- Weigle, Sara Cushing. (2002). Assessing Writing. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2018 Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.