Development of Integrated Biodiversity Student Worksheets With Computational Thinking
Main Article Content
Abstract
Computational thinking is used in learning to improve problem-solving skills in Biology subjects. Classroom learning emphasizes students memorizing biological science concepts in problem-solving, resulting in students' computational thinking skills needing to be improved. So, efforts to overcome this so that students are actively involved in the learning process and to improve students' computational thinking skills in understanding biodiversity material are by providing teaching materials such as LKPD. This study combines the concept of biodiversity with computational thinking components in worksheets so that students can develop computational skills while understanding Biology concepts. This development research aims to develop student worksheets by integrating computational thinking into biodiversity material. This development research was conducted using the 4-D method through 4 stages: define, design, develop, and disseminate. Data was collected using a questionnaire instrument by two validators consisting of language experts, material experts, and teaching material experts, as well as a readability test instrument by three teachers and ten students in class X at SMAN 3 Depok. The results of this study are in the form of student worksheets, which were successfully developed and suitable for use in learning because they obtained a valid category based on assessments from validators and a highly valid category from biology teachers and students.
Downloads
Article Details
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in PHENOMENON.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
Bahri, S., Syamsuri, I., & Mahanal, S. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Keanekaragaman Hayati dan Virus Berbasis Model Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Siswa Kelas X MAN 1 Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(2), 127–136. http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/6113
Barchas-Lichtenstein, J., Brucker, J. L., Nock, K., Gupta, R., & ... (2020). Education in the Pandemic & the Potential for Computational Thinking. https://www.datocms-assets.com/15254/1601924291-ct-pandemic-white-paperinfact2020-10-05.pdf
Chahyadi, F., Bettiza, M., Ritha, N., Radzi Rathomi, M., & Hayaty, N. (2021). Peningkatan High Order Thinking Skill Siswa Melalui Pendampingan Computational Thinking. Jurnal Anugerah, 3(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.31629/anugerah.v3i1.3344
Christensen, D., & Lombardi, D. (2020). Through Computational Thinking. Science and Education, 29, 1035–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00141-7
Fadilah, A. M., Muhlisin, A., & Ismawati, R. (2024). Development of an Ethnoscience-Based Integrated Science Module with RIAS Learning Model to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2023.13.2.16931
Gopinath, B., & Santhi, R. (2021). Development and Evaluation of Fishbone-Based Advanced Computational Thinking (FACT) Pedagogy: A Teacher-Student Collaborative Learning Environment in Engineering and Science Education. Higher Education for the Future, 8(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120970177
Harjono, A., Syukur, A., Bahri, S., Studi, P., Fisika, P., Mataram, U., Studi, P., Biologi, P., Mataram, U., Studi, P., Kimia, P., Mataram, U., & Thinking, C. (2018). Identifikasi Kesiapan LKPD Guru Terhadap Keterampilan Abad 21 Pada Pembelajaran IPA SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Profei Pendidikan, 3(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v3i2.20
Hidayah, I. N., & Kuntjoro, S. (2022). Pengembangan E-LKPD Perubahan Lingkungan Berbasis Science Literacy untuk Melatihkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Kelas X SMA. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 11(2), 384–393. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v11n2.p384-393
Kurniasi, E. R., Vebrian, R., & Arsisari, A. (2022). Development of Student Worksheets Based Computational Thinking for Derivatives of Algebra Function. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(1), 212–222. . https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i1.6022
Maharani, S., Nusantara, T., As’ari, A. R., & Qohar, A. (2020). Computational Thinking Pemecahan Masalah di Abad Ke-21 (Issue December). https://pics.unipma.ac.id/content/download/B009_26_10_2021_04_58_22Haki%20buku%20CT1.pdf
Mila, N., Nuralamsyah., & Hasan, A. A. N. Q. A. N. A. M. (2023). Efektivitas Pemanfaatan Canva sebagai Media Pembelajaran Luring. Multiverse: Open Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.57251/multiverse.v2i2.1258
Mildaty. Muldayati, N.D. Sunandar, A. (2022). Validitas Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Pada Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Berbasis Discovery Learning Dengan Potensi Tumbuhan Lokal di Taman Digulis Pontianak. JPB) Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi: Kajian Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 9(1), 29–37. https://soj.umrah.ac.id/index.php/SOJFKIP/article/view/1051%0Ahttps://soj.umrah.ac.id/index.php/SOJFKIP/article/download/1051/925
Muliyati, D., Permana, H., Fauzi, M. R., Pratiwi, Y., Purwahida, R., Utami, I. S., & Siswoyo, S. (2021). The development of online comics to explain the “nuclear reaction” topic. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331(April). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041763
Novita, K., Bare, Y., & S, M. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Berbasis Model Problem Based Learning Kelas X SMA. Biogenerasi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v7i2.1982
Pramaditya, N. D., & Ambarwati, R. (2020). Validitas dan Kepraktisan LKPD Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains Dasar Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Kelas X SMA. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 10(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v10n1.p158-164
Román-González, M., Moreno-León, J., Robles, G. (2019). Combining Assessment Tools for a Comprehensive Evaluation of Computational Thinking Interventions. In: Kong, SC., Abelson, H. (eds) Computational Thinking Education. In Computational Thinking Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7_5
Santoso, H. A. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Siswa SMA. Maju, 8(1), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18900.55684
Sari, F. K., Roshayanti, F., Rakhmawati, R., & Hayat, M. S. (2022). Persepsi Guru Biologi Terhadap Computational Thinking. Jurnal Biogenesis, 18(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.31258/biogenesis.18.1.68-84
Setiana, D. S. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Matematika Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Surya Edukasi (JPSE), 4(2), 35–48. http://ejournal.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/surya/article/view/5341
Setyawan, S. A., Savira, S., Sabrina, T. I., Khairunnisa, F., Suryanda, A., Rini, D. S., & Ristanto, R. H. (2021). Pengembangan Penuntun Praktikum Ekosistem Dan Interaksi Dalam Ekosistem. Journal of Biology Learning, 2(2), 58. https://doi.org/10.32585/jbl.v2i2.775
Suryanda, A., Ernawati, E., & Maulana, A. (2016). Pengembangan Modul Multimedia Mobile Learning Dengan Android Studio 4.1 Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati Bagi Siswa Sma Kelas X. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi (BIOSFERJPB), 9(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.9-1.9
Suryaningsih, S., Nurlita, R., Islam, U., Syarif, N., & Jakarta, H. (2021). Pentingnya Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Elektronik ( E-LKPD ) Inovatif Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(7), 1256–1268. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v2i07.233
Tyara Augie, K. (2021). Penggunaan Podcast Untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa selama Gangguan Pandemi. Didactical Mathematics, 3(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v3i1.1042