ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI LITERASI SAINS MENGGUNAKAN THREE TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST MATERI CAHAYA


(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/phen.2018.8.2.2494
Recently mastery of scientific literacy for students has become the focus of education. The level of scientific literacy skills of students in Indonesia is low, which is influenced by misconceptions. So far, study on the development of diagnostic tests that uncover the misconception of scientific literacy is still limited, whereas it is much needed to improve the learning system in Indonesia. The result of observation and interview of scientific lesson in SMP Negeri 05 Semarang shows that students having difficulties in studying light materials and evaluation tools used by teachers are not continued to reveal misconception of scienctific literacy. The aims of this study to develop three tier multiple choice (3TMC) test with the scientific literacy aspect and to find the misconception of students' light scientific literacy. The research sample is class VIIIE and VIIIF with mix method of sequential explanatory strategy. The result of 3TMC test instrument with scientific literacy aspect which is developed which is 30 item where 25 items fulfill criteria with valid result, reliable, sufficient distinguishing, medium difficulty level while 5 grains are not used. The results of the interpretation indicate that the average learners have misconception of scientific literacy aspects of knowledge (A), science investigation competence (B), science as a way of thinking (C) and application of science to technology, society and environment. In-depth interviews were conducted on 7 students who experienced the highest misconception of scientific literacy. The result they experience misconceptions of scientific literacy indicators of light properties, viewing processes, eye defects and optical devices.

Keywords: Scientific Literacy Skills;Multiple Choice Test

  1. Alchin, D. 2014. From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View From The Class. Scie & Educ, 23(9): 1911-1932.
  2. Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  3. Aydin, S. 2012. Remidiation Of Misconceptions About Geometric Optics Using Conceptual Change Texts. Journal of Education Research And Behavioral Sciences, 1(1): 1-12.
  4. Boujaoude, S. 2002. Balance of Science Literacy Themes in Science Curricula: The Case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2): 139-156.
  5. Budiningsih, T. Y., Rusilowati, A., & Marwoto, P. 2015.
  6. Pengembangan Buku Ajar IPA Terpadu Berorientasi Literasi Sains Materi Energi dan Suhu.Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2): 34-40.
  7. Caleon, I. S. & Subramaniam, R. 2010. Development and Aplication of Three Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 7(1): 939-961.
  8. Chiappetta, E. L., Filman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. 1991. A Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8): 713–725.
  9. Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. 1989. Not Al Preconceptions are Misconceptions: Finding ‘Anchoring Conceptions’ for Grounding Instruction on Students’ Intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3): 253–265.
  10. Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  11. Dani, D. 2009. Scientific Literacy And Purposes For Teaching Science: A Case Study Of Lebanese Private School Teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3): 289-299.
  12. Djanette, B., & Fouad, C. 2014. Determination of University Student’s Misconceptions about Light using Concept Maps. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152(1): 582-589.
  13. Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. 2015. Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test untukMengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2), 41-49.
  14. Franke, G., Scharfenberg, F. J., & Bogner, F. X. 2013. Research Articel Investigation of Students Alternative Conceptions of Terms and Processes of Gene Technology. ISRN Education, 2013:1-13.
  15. Gurel, D. K., Ali, E., & Lilian, C.M. 2015. A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science.Eurasia J. Math. Sci. & Tech. Ed., 11(5), 989-1008.
  16. Hindarto, N. 2009. Dampak Pelatihan Guru Pemandu Bidang Studi IPA terhadap Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2): 190-195.
  17. Ma’muroh, H., Asrizal.,& Zulhendri, K. 2014. Pembuatan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu berbasis ICT Untuk Mengukur Kompetensi Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Phylar of Physic Education, 1(3): 41-48.
  18. Matondang, Z. 2009. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa PPs Unimed, 6(1): 87-97.
  19. Maturradiyah, N., & Rusilowati, A. 2015.Analisis Buku Ajar Fisika SMA Kelas XII di Kabupaten Pati Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 4(1): 16-20.
  20. Odja, A. H. & Payu, C. S. 2014. Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Konsep IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
  21. OECD. 2016a. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publications.
  22. OECD. 2016b. PISA Result in Focus. Paris: OECD Publications.
  23. Permatasari, O. I., Rusilowati, A. & Masturi. 2014. Developing Science Learning Materials for Junior High School Based on Way of Investigating to Improve Scientefic Literacy. ICMSE, (1-5).
  24. Rusilowati, A. 2013. Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa melalui Pengembangan Instrument Penilaian. Pidato Pengukuhan Profesor Bidang Evaluasi Pendidikan Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Semarang.
  25. Rusilowati. 2014. Analisis Buku Ajar IPA yang Digunakan Di Semarang Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Konservasi dan Kualitas Pendidikan, 6-10. Semarang: UNNES.
  26. Rusilowati, A., Kurniawati, L., Nugroho, S. E., & Widiyatmoko, A. 2016. Developing an Instrumen of Scientific Literacy Asessment on The Cycle Theme. International Journal of Enviromental & Science Education, 11(12): 5718-5727.
  27. Sari, D. M., Surantoro.,& Ekawati, E. Y. 2013. Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Termodinamika pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1): 5-8.
  28. Taufiq, M. 2012. Remediasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika padaKonsep Gaya melalui Penerapan Model Siklus Belajar(Learning Cycle) 5E. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 198-203.
  29. Udompong, L. & Wongwanich, S. 2014. Diagnosis of the Scientific Literacy Characteristic of Primary Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(1): 5091-5096.
  30. Wilkinson, J. 1999. A Quantitative Analysis of Physics Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes. Research in Science Education, 29(3): 385-399.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2018 Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Walisongo Semarang
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 815-7502-8676
Website: https://fst.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: phenomenon@walisongo.ac.id


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

apps