ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI LITERASI SAINS MENGGUNAKAN THREE TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST MATERI CAHAYA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Downloads
Article Details
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in PHENOMENON.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
Alchin, D. 2014. From Science Studies to Scientific Literacy: A View From The Class. Scie & Educ, 23(9): 1911-1932.
Arikunto, S. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Aydin, S. 2012. Remidiation Of Misconceptions About Geometric Optics Using Conceptual Change Texts. Journal of Education Research And Behavioral Sciences, 1(1): 1-12.
Boujaoude, S. 2002. Balance of Science Literacy Themes in Science Curricula: The Case of Lebanon. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2): 139-156.
Budiningsih, T. Y., Rusilowati, A., & Marwoto, P. 2015.
Pengembangan Buku Ajar IPA Terpadu Berorientasi Literasi Sains Materi Energi dan Suhu.Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2): 34-40.
Caleon, I. S. & Subramaniam, R. 2010. Development and Aplication of Three Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Secondary Students’ Understanding of Waves. International Journal of Science Education, 7(1): 939-961.
Chiappetta, E. L., Filman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. 1991. A Method to Quantify Major Themes of Scientific Literacy in Science Textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8): 713–725.
Clement, J., Brown, D. E., & Zietsman, A. 1989. Not Al Preconceptions are Misconceptions: Finding ‘Anchoring Conceptions’ for Grounding Instruction on Students’ Intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3): 253–265.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Dani, D. 2009. Scientific Literacy And Purposes For Teaching Science: A Case Study Of Lebanese Private School Teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3): 289-299.
Djanette, B., & Fouad, C. 2014. Determination of University Student’s Misconceptions about Light using Concept Maps. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152(1): 582-589.
Fariyani, Q., Rusilowati, A., & Sugianto. 2015. Pengembangan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test untukMengungkap Miskonsepsi Fisika Siswa SMA Kelas X. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 4(2), 41-49.
Franke, G., Scharfenberg, F. J., & Bogner, F. X. 2013. Research Articel Investigation of Students Alternative Conceptions of Terms and Processes of Gene Technology. ISRN Education, 2013:1-13.
Gurel, D. K., Ali, E., & Lilian, C.M. 2015. A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instruments to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science.Eurasia J. Math. Sci. & Tech. Ed., 11(5), 989-1008.
Hindarto, N. 2009. Dampak Pelatihan Guru Pemandu Bidang Studi IPA terhadap Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2): 190-195.
Ma’muroh, H., Asrizal.,& Zulhendri, K. 2014. Pembuatan Instrumen Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu berbasis ICT Untuk Mengukur Kompetensi Siswa SMP Kelas VIII. Phylar of Physic Education, 1(3): 41-48.
Matondang, Z. 2009. Validitas dan Reliabilitas Suatu Penelitian. Jurnal Tabularasa PPs Unimed, 6(1): 87-97.
Maturradiyah, N., & Rusilowati, A. 2015.Analisis Buku Ajar Fisika SMA Kelas XII di Kabupaten Pati Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 4(1): 16-20.
Odja, A. H. & Payu, C. S. 2014. Analisis Kemampuan Awal Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Konsep IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia. Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
OECD. 2016a. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publications.
OECD. 2016b. PISA Result in Focus. Paris: OECD Publications.
Permatasari, O. I., Rusilowati, A. & Masturi. 2014. Developing Science Learning Materials for Junior High School Based on Way of Investigating to Improve Scientefic Literacy. ICMSE, (1-5).
Rusilowati, A. 2013. Peningkatan Literasi Sains Siswa melalui Pengembangan Instrument Penilaian. Pidato Pengukuhan Profesor Bidang Evaluasi Pendidikan Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Rusilowati. 2014. Analisis Buku Ajar IPA yang Digunakan Di Semarang Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Konservasi dan Kualitas Pendidikan, 6-10. Semarang: UNNES.
Rusilowati, A., Kurniawati, L., Nugroho, S. E., & Widiyatmoko, A. 2016. Developing an Instrumen of Scientific Literacy Asessment on The Cycle Theme. International Journal of Enviromental & Science Education, 11(12): 5718-5727.
Sari, D. M., Surantoro.,& Ekawati, E. Y. 2013. Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Termodinamika pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1): 5-8.
Taufiq, M. 2012. Remediasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika padaKonsep Gaya melalui Penerapan Model Siklus Belajar(Learning Cycle) 5E. Journal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 198-203.
Udompong, L. & Wongwanich, S. 2014. Diagnosis of the Scientific Literacy Characteristic of Primary Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(1): 5091-5096.
Wilkinson, J. 1999. A Quantitative Analysis of Physics Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes. Research in Science Education, 29(3): 385-399.