Construct the Validity of STEM and Project-based Critical Thinking Skills Test Instruments Using the Rasch Model

Rina Dwi Setyawati*    -  Universitas PGRI SEmarang, Indonesia
Binod Prasad    -  Kathmandu University, Nepal, Nepal
Agnita Siska Pramasdyahsari    -  Universitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia
Sindi Nur Aini  -  Universitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

Supp. File(s): Research Instrument

Students' critical thinking skills are very important abilities in the 21st century. To measure critical thinking skills, a valid and reliable instrument is needed. This article uses the Rasch model to construct an instrument for critical thinking skills on number pattern material whose learning uses STEM PjBL. The development method uses the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE) stages. Data processing uses the Rasch model assisted by the Winstep program. The instrument was tested on 33 public junior high school students in Semarang. The research results include validity, namely the validity test by experts with an average percentage of 92.4% in the very valid category, the quality of the questions in the instrument reliability aspect is good, and the average critical thinking ability of students who use STEM-based and Project Based instruments Learning was 61.46, higher than other classes at 49.79. The critical thinking test instrument is based on STEM and the project needs to be further developed on other materials.

Keywords: Construct Validity, Critical Thinking Skill, Rasch Model

Kemampuan  berpikir kritis  siswa  merupakan  kemampuan  yang  sangat penting  di  abad  21  ini.  Untuk  mengukur  kemampuan  berpikir  kritis diperlukan instrumen yang valid dan reliabel. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan instrument tes kemampuan berpikir kritis yang berbasis STEM dan proyek. Soal terdiri dari 15 item materi aritmatika sosial yang memuat   indikator Focus,   Reason,   Inferent,   Situation,   Clarity   dan Overview. Metode pengembangan menggunakan tahapan analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation(ADDIE).Pengolahan data menggunakan  model Raschberbantuan  program Winstep.   Instrumen diujicobakan  pada  33  siswa  SMP  Negeri diSemarang.  Hasil  penelitian mencakup valid   yaitu   pada uji   validitas   oleh   ahli   dengan   rata-rata persentase sebesar 92,4 % dalam kategori sangat valid, kualitas butir soal pada aspek reliabilitas instrumen baik, dan  rata-rata  kemampuan berpikir kritis  siswa  yang  menggunakan  instrument  berbasis  STEM  danproyeksebesar  61,46  lebih  tinggi  dari kelas  lain sebesar  49,79.  Instrument  tes berpikir  kritis  didasarkan  pada  STEM  dan  proyek  perlu  dikembangkan lebih lanjut pada materi-materi lainya.

Supplement Files

Keywords: Validitas Konstruk, STEM, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Model Rasch

  1. S. Lamb S, Q. Maire, and E. Doecke, Key Skills for the 21st Century: an evidence-based review (Education: Future Frontiers, State of New South Wales, 2017)
  2. B. Cahyono, K. Kartono, B. Waluya, M. Mulyono, and R. D. Setyawati, Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), pp. 2956-2969 (2021)
  3. R. H. Ennis, Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines 26 (1): PP. 4–18 (2011)
  4. B. Cahyono, K. Kartono, B. Waluyo, and M. Mulyono, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321 (2) pp. 1742-6596 (2019)
  5. D. Laboy-Rush, Integrated STEM Education through Project-Based Learning, (Learning.Com, 2011)
  6. S. Han, R. Capraro and M. Capraro, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (5) pp. 1089-1113 (2015)
  7. E. Yulianti, E. Hamimi, and R. Rahmagusviana, Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 11 (2), pp. 169-188 (2021)
  8. G. Sarican, I. Technology, and D. Akgunduz, Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences , 13 (1), pp. 94-107 (2018)
  9. E. Saxton, R. Burns, S. Holveck, S. Kelley, D. Prince, N. Rigelman, and E. A. Skinner, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, pp. 18–35 (2014).
  10. A. Fitriyah, and S. D. Ramadani, Journal Of Chemistry And Education (JCAE), X(1), pp. 209–226 (2021)
  11. T.R. Allanta, and L. Puspita, Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), pp. 158–170 (2021)
  12. S.N. Mufida, D. V. Sigit, and R.H. Ristanto, R. H, Biosfer, 13(2), PP. 183–200 (2020)
  13. Djaali, P. Muljono and Ramly, Pengukuran Dalam Pendidikan (Grasindo, Jakarta, 2008)
  14. W. Nurkancana, and PPN. Sunartana, Evaluasi Hasil Belajar (Usaha Nasional, Surabaya, 1992)
  15. R.D. Setyawati, Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 7(2), pp. 174-186 (2018)
  16. S. Azwar, Sikap Manusia Teori dan Pengukurannya (Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1987)
  17. T.G. Bond, and C.M. Fox, Applying the Rasch Model : Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences Second Edition University of Toledo.an Sciences Second Edition, LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES, Mahwah, New Jersey London (2007)
  18. A. Aziz, M. S. Jusoh, M. H. Amlus, A. R. Omar, and T.S. A. Salleh, Journal of Applied Science and Agriculture, 9(12), pp. 7–12 (2014)
  19. S. Ariffin, B. Omar, A. Isa, and S. Sharif, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, pp. 729–733 (2010)
  20. G. Rasch, G. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, Copenhagen: Hunksgaard 14 (2), pp. 68-94 (1980)
  21. B. D. Wright, and M. H. Stone, Test Design. Mesa Press, Chicago (1979)
  22. J. W. Creswell, Educational research : planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research- 4th ed. (Pearson Education, Boylston Street, Boston, 2012)
  23. D.R. Cooper, and P.R. Schindler, Business research methods (8th ed.). (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2003)
  24. G.A. Johanson, and G.P. Brooks, Educational and psychological measurement, 70 (3), pp. 394-400 (2010)
  25. J. M. Linacre, Journal of Applied Measurement, 7(1), pp. 129-139 (2006)
  26. W.J. Boone, CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4), Winter rm4 (2016)
  27. P. D. Sugiono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif (Alfabeta, Bandung, 2015)
  28. Safari, Teknik analisis butir soal instrumen tes dan nontes (assosiasi Pengawas Sekolah Indonesia-Depdiknas, 2015)
  29. A.A. Rangkuti, Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 23(XIV), pp. 66-73 (2011).
  30. A.W. Sabekti, and F. Khoirunnisa, Jurnal Zarah, 6(2), pp. 68–75 (2018).
  31. R. M. Yasin, F. A. N. Yunus, R. C. Rus, A. Ahmad, and M. B. Rahim, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, pp. 212-217 (2015)
  32. Ruamba, M. Y., Mastur, Z., & Kharisudin, I. (2022). Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Calon Guru Matematika pada Mata Kuliah Teori Peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JUPITEK), 5(1), 34-41.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Published by Faculty of Science and Technology UIN Walisongo Semarang
Jl Prof. Dr. Hamka Kampus III Ngaliyan Semarang 50185
Phone: +62 815-7502-8676
Website: https://fst.walisongo.ac.id/
Email: phenomenon@walisongo.ac.id

apps