Tradition meets technology: The role of Artificial Intelligence in Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah’s digital adaptation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2025.10.2.30339

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), digital da'wah, innovation diffusion, technology adaptation, Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the digital media landscape has generated a duality of concerns and hopes among religious organizations such as Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah. On one hand, AI is perceived as potentially eroding humanistic values; on the other, it offers the promise of accelerating the dissemination of Islamic teachings through digital platforms. This study aims to examine the adaptation process of AI technology within the digital media ecosystems of both organizations and to identify the key enabling and inhibiting factors. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with selected informants and institutional document analysis. The study adopts Everett Rogers’ diffusion of innovation model, encompassing five stages: knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation. Findings reveal that NU has adopted AI through platforms such as Siskader, Kitab AI, Pandai AI, and sentiment analysis, while Muhammadiyah has developed Chat HPT, Goal Align Assessment, and AI-based customer service tools. These adaptations are driven by pressures to modernize, the need for a progressive organizational image, cadre openness to innovation, and user enthusiasm. Conversely, limited financial resources, insufficient computational capacity, and prolonged training durations are significant barriers. The study underscores the importance of a collaborative approach that integrates Islamic values with digital innovation strategies to enhance the da’wah capacity and organizational transformation in the age of artificial intelligence.

*****

Perkembangan pesat Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam lanskap media digital telah menimbulkan dualitas kekhawatiran dan harapan di antara organisasi keagamaan seperti Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) dan Muhammadiyah. Di satu sisi, AI dipandang berpotensi mengikis nilai-nilai humanistik; di sisi lain, AI menawarkan janji untuk mempercepat penyebaran ajaran Islam melalui platform digital. Studi ini bertujuan untuk meneliti proses adaptasi teknologi AI dalam ekosistem media digital kedua organisasi tersebut dan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor pendukung dan penghambat utamanya. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan informan terpilih dan analisis dokumen institusional. Studi ini mengadopsi model difusi inovasi Everett Rogers, yang mencakup lima tahap: pengetahuan, persuasi, keputusan, implementasi, dan konfirmasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa NU telah mengadopsi AI melalui platform seperti Siskader, Kitab AI, Pandai AI, dan analisis sentimen, sementara Muhammadiyah telah mengembangkan Chat HPT, Goal Align Assessment, dan alat layanan pelanggan berbasis AI. Adaptasi ini didorong oleh tekanan untuk modernisasi, kebutuhan akan citra organisasi yang progresif, keterbukaan kader terhadap inovasi, dan antusiasme pengguna. Sebaliknya, keterbatasan sumber daya keuangan, kapasitas komputasi yang tidak memadai, dan durasi pelatihan yang panjang merupakan hambatan yang signifikan. Studi ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya pendekatan kolaboratif yang mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai Islam dengan strategi inovasi digital untuk meningkatkan kapasitas da’wah dan transformasi organisasi di era kecerdasan buatan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, M. Z., Hasyim, M., & Fitriyani, L. (2022). Islamic value-based innovation in social services: The case of Muhammadiyah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 11(2), 123–135.

Adeni. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a source of Islamic information: Examining the response of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah in Indonesia. International Conference on Islam, Media and Communication (ICIMAC). https://oarep.usim.edu.my/entities/publication/0174d3b0-4e54-4e93-998a-e10cec57f471.

Aziz, R. A., Fitriyanti, Y., Rohman, F., Islam, U., & Ulama, N. (2023). Tantangan pendidikan karakter islami di era teknologi. Tarbawi : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 20(1), 47–62. https://ejournal.unisnu.ac.id/JPIT/article/view/5431.

Campolo, A., & Domingos, P. (2017). AI and religion: Implications for ethics and society. AI & Society, 32(1), 1–6.

Campolo, A., & White, R. (2020). AI and ethics: Emerging challenges and perspectives. AI Now Institute.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing Human Life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Esposito, J. L., & Finlay, V. (2020). Religion and ethics in the age of digital media. Routledge.

Faisyal. (2023). Antara AI, manusia, dan kegiatan agama. Oratio Directa, 5(1).

Imaduddin, M. F. (2021). Teknologi kecerdasan artifisial dan religiusitas: Motif, model, implementasi, dan pengaruh (studi terhadap komunitas muslim milenial Kota Malang). Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Indainanto, Y. I. (2020). Artificial Intelligence dalam rutinitas media online. Universitas Diponegoro.

Kraidy, M. (2020). The naked blogger of Cairo: Creative insurgency in the Arab World. Harvard University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.).

Nashir, H. (2023). Pidato lengkap milad Muhammadiyah 111 tahun. Suara Muhammadiyah.

Nasr, S. H. (2006). Islam, science, and the challenge of history. Oxford University Press.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction, how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York, NY: Broadway Books.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., Angeles, L., & Northwest, K. P. (2016). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed-method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.Purposeful.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Redaksi Tempo. Survei Populix: 45 persen karyawan gunakan platform berbasis kecerdasan buatan. Tempo. https://www.tempo.co/sains/survei-populix-45-persen-karyawan-gunakan-platform-berbasis-kecerdasan-buatan-175272.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.).

Santos, S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Routledge.

Shadiqin, S. I., Marjan, T., & Ikramatoun, S. (2023). AI dan agama: Tantangan dan peluang dalam era digital. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM), 4(2).

Tirosh-Samuelson’s, H. (2021). Religion and Artificial Intelligence: Toward a theological anthropology. In AI, the future of humanity. Cham: Springer.

Warschauer, M. (2004). Of digital divides and social multipliers: Combining language and technology for human development. Information and communication technologies in the teaching and learning of foreign languages: State of the art, needs and perspectives (pp. 46-52). Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.

Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. University of California Press, Berkeley.

West, D.M., & Allen, J.R. (2020). Turning point: Policymaking in the era of Artificial Intelligence.

Yusoff. M., & Mohamed, H. (2022). Islamic ethics in Artificial Intelligence: A framework for muslim societies. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 12(1), 65–84.

Zhang, B., Dafoe, A., & Dafoe, H. (2021). AI governance: A research agenda. Center for the Governance of AI.

Zulkifli, M., Ramadhan, I., & Kurniawan, A. (2023). Teknologi AI dan praktik keagamaan: Studi terhadap penggunaan aplikasi Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Komunikasi Islam Digital, 2(1), 45–60.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Nada-Qisthina, D. S., & Musyafak, N. (2025). Tradition meets technology: The role of Artificial Intelligence in Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah’s digital adaptation. Islamic Communication Journal, 10(2), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.21580/icj.2025.10.2.30339

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.