USING PEER-RESPONSES AND TEACHER’S WRITTEN FEEDBACK TECHNIQUE THROUGH BLOG IN WRITING II CLASS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv4i11631Keywords:
Peer Response, Teacher’s Written Feedback, BlogAbstract
This article discusses the result of the research undertaken at PBI UIN Raden Fatah Palembang. The sample of the research was 60 students in Writing II Classes. This study included a guided writing instruction and a questionnaire survey.There were two groups of students involved in this study; control and experimental group. Students in the control group were taught using Peer Response Technique, and the experimental one by using Teacher’s written feedback technique. Both groups employed online Blog writing as the means to share feedback. After the treatment done, the students were required to fi ll the questionnaire items in order to assess their attitude toward the use of Blog in their writing class. The results of the research showed that; (1) there was not a signifi cant difference between students writing achievement before being taught with Teacher’s Written Feedback Technique and after being taught with that technique (2) there was a signifi cant difference between students’ writing achievement before being taught by using Peer Response Technique and after being taught by using that technique (3) there was signifi cant difference between students’ writing achievement who were taught by using Peer Response Technique than those who were taught by using Teachers’ Written Feedback and (4) there was positive attitude toward the process of teaching and learning Writing by Using Blog Writing.Downloads
References
Allaei, S. and Connor, U. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-
cultural collaboration in writing classrooms. The Writing in-
struction. 10(1): 19-28
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing
in a multipledraft composition classroom: Is content feed-
back followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of
Second Language Writing. 9(3): 227-257.
Beason, L. (1993). Feedback and revision in writing across the cur-
riculum classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(4), 395-
Dixon, N. 2005. Why put writing last? - Integrating the Productive Skills in
General English Classes. Paper presented in LIA International
Conference 2005, Jakarta, March 22-24.
Forman, E.A. and Cazden, C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian per-
spective in education. In J. V. Wertsch (ed.). The cognitive
value of peer interactions. (pp. 332-347).
Furnborough, C., & Truman, M. (2009). Adult beginner distance
language learner perceptions and use of assignment feedback,
Distance Education, 30, 399-418.
Gebhard, R. (1980). Teamwork and feedback broadening the base
of collaborative Writing. College Coposition and Communi-
cation. 42: 69-74.
Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R.B. (1996). Theory & Practice of Writing.
London: Pearson Education.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Es-
sex: Longman.
Hatch, E & Hossein Farhady. (1982). Research Design and Statitistics
for Applied Linguistics. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House
Publishers.
Holec, H. 1981. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Per-
gamon.
Keh, C.L. (1996). Feedback in the writing process. In T. Hedge and
W. Norman (eds.). Power, pedagogy and practice (pp. 294-306).
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kurniali, Sartika. 2008. Tip-Trik Pilihan Blogger. Jakarta. PT Elex Me-
dia Computindo.
Mittan, R. (1989). The peer review process: harnessing students’
communicative power. In D.M. Johnson and D.H. Roen (eds.),
Richness in writing (pp. 207-219). New York: Longman.
Moore, H. (1996). Telling what is real: Competing views in assess-
ing English as a second language development. Linguistics and
Education. 8: 189-228.
Nelson, G. and Murphy, J. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2
writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL
Quarterly. 27: 135-142.
Wallen, N.E. (1991). Educational Research: A Guide to the Process.USA:
McGraw Hill Inc.
Wang, Y. 2004. English magazines = motivation + Improved EFL
writing skill. English Teaching Forum, 43(3): 18-22
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning the right of publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.