Direct Teacher Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing Class at Higher Education: What Students Perceive

Sabarun Sabarun

Abstract


The study is aimed at describing the students’ perception of direct teacher corrective feedback in a foreign language writing class. It is descriptive quantitative research, employing questionnaires and observation as research instruments, which was conducted with 20 students of the fourth semester English department students of Palangka Raya State Islamic Institute of 2018/ 2019 academic year. The findings revealed that, firstly, in terms of the perception of students’ attitudes toward direct teacher corrective feedback, 75 percent of participants felt that they agreed to receive direct teacher corrective feedback on language form, content, and organization. Their preference for the area of corrective feedback in language forms was 85 percent while the organization was 65 percent. Secondly, dealing with the students’ perception on direct teacher feedback, 90 percent of students argued that they felt satisfied when they got direct teacher feedback. 85 percent of students perceived that their teacher’s feedback helped them improve their writing, and 90 percent of them realized that their teacher’s feedback made them feel confident in producing a better draft. Finally, most students responded that they appreciated the teacher’s feedback. In addition, the students believed that direct teacher feedback improved writing especially on grammar accuracy and organization.


Keywords


direct teacher feedback; students’ perception; writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amara, T. M. (2015). Learners’ perceptions of teacher written feedback commentary in an ESL writing classroom. In International Journal of English Language Teaching (Vol. 3).

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9

Chung, B. (2015). Written corrective feedback: The perception of Korean EFL learners. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 75–88.

Clements, S. J. (2011). Writing conferences in kindergarten : using feedback to enhance student writing. Proquest, Umi Dissertation Publishing.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System, 42(1), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023

Erkkilä, M. (2013). Teacher Written Feedback: Teachers’ perceptions of given feedback Candidate’s thesis. University of Jyväskylä.

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., & Allen Tuioti, E. (2010). Written Corrective Feedback: The Practitioners’ Perspective. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119191

Ferris, D., & Bitchener, J. (2012). Written Corrective Feedback for L2 Development : Current Knowledge and Future Research. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 855–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.62

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “‘Grammar Correction’” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime ...?). Journal of Second Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

Hamouda, A. (2011). A Study of Students and Teachers’ Preferences and Attitudes towards Correction of Classroom Written Errors in Saudi EFL Context. 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p128

Jodaie, M., Farrokhi, F., & Zoghi, M. (2011). A Comparative Study of EFL Teachers’ and Intermediate High School Students’ Perceptions of Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Errors. English Language Teaching, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p36

Kartchava, E. (2016). Learners’ Beliefs About Corrective Feedback in the Language Classroom: Perspectives from Two International Contexts. TESL Canada Journal, 33(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v33i2.1235

Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001

Mahfoodh, O., & Pandian, A. (2011). A Qualitative Case Study of EFL Students’ Affective Reactions to and Perceptions of Their Teachers’ Written Feedback. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p14

Martinez Buffa, I. (2016). Written corrective feedback in secondary education: Learners’ and teachers’ preferences and perceptions. Fòrum de Recerca, (21), 525–546. https://doi.org/10.6035/forumrecerca.2016.21.29

Mustafa, R. F. (2012). Feedback on the feedback: Sociocultural interpretation of Saudi ESL learners’ opinions about writing feedback. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p3

Oler, S. O. (2015). EFL Students’ Attitudes and Preferences towards Written Corrective Feedback (Universitat Jaume I.). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10234/134705

Rejab, H. M., Ismail, Z., & Jamaludin, S. (2015). Teacher’s feedback on Arabic student writing process. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p608

Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000356

Sheen, Y. (2007). The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners’ Acquisition of Articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x

Smalley, R. L., Ruetten, M. K., & Kozyrev, J. (2012). Refining composition skills : academic writing and grammar. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128–141. https://doi.org/doi:10.5539/elt.v4n3p128

Song, G., Hoon, L. H., & Alvin, L. P. (2017). Students’ Response to Feedback: An Exploratory Study. RELC Journal, 48(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217691445

Soori, A., Kafipour, R., & Soury, M. (2011). Effectiveness of different types of direct corrective feedback on correct use of English articles among the Iranian EFL Students. European Journal of Social Sciences, 26(4), 494–501.

Tangkiengsirisin, S., & Kalra, R. (2016). Thai Students’ Perceptions on the Direct Vs. Indirect Written Corrective Feedback: A Thai University Context. (AWEJ), Arab World English Journal, 7(3), 161–176.

Treglia, M. O. (2008). Feedback on Feedback: Exploring Student Responses to Teachers’ Written Commentary. Journal of Basic Writing, 27(1), 105–137.

Vyatkina, N. (2011). Writing Instruction and Policies for Written Corrective Feedback in the Basic Language Sequence. In L2 Journal (Vol. 3). Retrieved from http://repositories.cdlib.org/uccllt/l2/vol3/iss1/art4/

Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. Indirect written corrective feedback: Student perceptions. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje Y Cultura, 22(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02

Williams, C. (2007). Research Methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5(3), 65–72.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/vjv9i14652

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by

         

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning

To improve the quality of the journal, since 25 July 2020, this journal officially had made cooperation with ELITE Association Indonesia (The Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature & Education). See The MoU Manuscript.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
View My Stats