Designing A Language Lesson: Pedagogical and Linguistic Perspectives

Authors

  • Didin Nuruddin Hidayat UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv7i22864

Keywords:

grammar, language lesson, pedagogy, linguistic

Abstract

Designing a language lesson is a challenging task for teachers. In order to have a good language lesson, teachers cannot just rely on the textbook. They need at least to develop the lesson from the textbook or even to design their own lesson. Teachers also need to consider how they are going to apply the lesson planned in the classroom. Another consideration would be to integrate the specific language skill and/or element with the other skills. This is essential in order to achieve the utmost results of teaching and learning. This paper discusses a language lesson in the area of grammar - Used To  - designed by the author. The lesson is not only intended to expose learners with the structure and rules of grammar, but also allow learners to practice the grammar in use. Hence, the developed grammar lesson aimed to improve the communicative competence of the learners. Considering the wide aspect of teaching analysis, the present article focuses on the application of the lessons in the classroom, the aspects of language skills covered, as well as the linguistic foundation for the exercises. It is hoped that this article can provide insights to language educators in developing grammar lessons that cater to the considerations of pedagogical and linguistic perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Didin Nuruddin Hidayat a lecturer at the Department of English Education, State Islamic University (UIN) Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. He has been working there for around 12 years. He teaches English-related subjects, such as Discourse Analysis, Writing, Speaking, Public Speaking

References

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., Hyams, N., Collins, P., & Amberber, M. (2005). An introduction to language (5th ed.). Melbourne: Nelson Australia.

Gorat, L. & Prijambodo, V. (2013). The effect of using deductive approach and inductive approach in teaching English to students on their conditional sentence mastery. Magister Scientiae, 33, 78-92.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Hinkel, E. (2006). Current perspective in teaching the four skills. TESOL Quarterly 40/1. pp. 109-131.

Hmedan, H. A. A., & Nafi, J. S. I (2016). The effect of using inductive and deductive methods on 7th grade students’ achievement in Grammar in Bethlehem District and their attitudes toward EFL. International Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 3(9), 38-53.

Hubbard, P., Jones, H., Thornton, B., & Wheeler, R. (1983). A training course for TEFL. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kenning, M. J. & Kenning, M.M. (1983). An introduction to computer assisted language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knowles, G. (1987). Patterns of spoken English: An introduction to English phonetics. New York: Longman.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stevick, E. (1982). Teaching and learning languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Thornbury, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. Essex: Pearson Education.

Wardhaugh, R. (1972). Introduction to linguistics. New York: McGraw Hill.

Willis, D. (2003). Rules, patterns and words : Grammar and lexis in English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). The study of language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-15

Issue

Section

Articles