Developing the Instrument of Fikih Assessment in Madrasah Aliyah

Agus Sutiyono*  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/nw.2022.16.1.15384
The study aimed to develop an instrument of Fikih assessment in Madrasah Aliyah (MA) that has good construct validity and at estimating the reliability of the Fikih assessment instrument in MA. This study used Research and Development (R & D) Method. The subjects in this study were the students in MAN Cilacap, MAN Banyumas, and MAN Purbalingga. This study found, first, that the instrument of Fikih assessment in the Regency of Cilacap, Banyumas, and Purbalingga has not met its standards as a measurement tool. Second, the development of the Fikih instrument in the MA has used observable variables by conducting a theoretical review of the Fikih learning materials in Grade XI of Senior High School from the 2013 Curriculum. So, the researcher formulated the Fikih Instrument Items and conducted a qualitative analysis with the assistance of the Fikih experts and Evaluation and Assessment experts. Indicators with 30 items have been equal to 0.976, which means that the nine indicators of the Fikih assessment instrument provide reliable estimates for the latent variables of the Fikih instrument.

Keywords: instrument development, assessment, Fikih

  1. Afriana, I., & Festiyed. (2020). Meta-analysis of authentic assessment instrument development to measure learning outcomes of learners SMA/MA. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1), 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012052.
  2. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W.M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  3. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
  4. Arikunto, S. (2004). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  5. Arikunto, S. (2009). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  6. Borg, W. R.A., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research an introduction.4th Edition. New York: Longman Inc.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research; planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Educational Edition.
  8. Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20, Tahun 2003, tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
  9. Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 19, Tahun 2005, tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
  10. Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 22, Tahun 2006, tentang Standar isi.
  11. Fariyani, Q., & Kusuma, H. H. (2021). Development of Test Instruments to Analyze Higher-Order Thinking Skills Through Science-Based Literacy Learning. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1886.
  12. Geldhof, G.J., Preacher, K., Zyphur, M.J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Physocological methods, 19 (1).
  13. Gronlund, N.E. (1976). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. New York: Macmillan.
  14. Hair, J. F. JR., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Six Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Educational, Inc.
  15. Hasan, S. W., Auliah, A., & Herawati, N. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA. Chemistry Education Review (CER). https://doi.org/10.26858/cer.v3i2.13769.
  16. Joreskog, K., & Sorbum, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International Inc.
  17. Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Asas-asas penelitian Behavioral (terj. L.R. Simatupang). Yogyakarta: Gajah mada University Press.
  18. Levin, H. M. (2011). The utility and need for incorporating non-cognitif skill into large scale educational assessment. Presented at ETS Invitational on International Large-Scale Assessment and to be published by Educational Testing Service. USA: Teacher College, Columbia University.
  19. Lions, S., Monsalve, C., Dartnell, P., Godoy, M. I., Córdova, N., Jiménez, D., Blanco, M. P., Ortega, G., & Lemarié, J. (2021). The Position of Distractors in Multiple-Choice Test Items: The Strongest Precede the Weakest. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.731763.
  20. Mardapi, D. (1988). Practical implementation of validity generalization whit the Indonesian University selection test (sipenmaru). Disertasi doktor 1988.
  21. Mardapi, D. (2017). Pengukuran, penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
  22. Mardapi, D., dkk. (1999). Survey kegiatan guru dalam melakukan penilaian di kelas. Laporan Penelitian. Yogyakarta: IKIP Yogyakara.
  23. Maulida, I., Dibia, I. K., & Astawan, I. G. (2020). The Development of Social Attitude Assessment Instrument and Social Studies Learning Outcomes Grade IV on Theme of Indahnya Keragaman di Negeriku. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i2.25823.
  24. Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Prasojo, L. D., Idi, A., & Hamidah, A. (2019). Curriculum reform in indonesia: Moving from an exclusive to inclusive curriculum. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.543.
  25. Nunally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2^(nd )ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
  26. Nurhalim, M. (2018). Mengembangkan Format Penilaian Komprehensif dalam Pengembangan KTSP. INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 15(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v15i3.1555.
  27. Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessment what teacher need to know. Boston, USA.
  28. Purwanto, (2009). Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  29. Retnawati, Heri, (2016). Validitas reliabilitas & karakteristik butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
  30. Setiawan, J., Ajat Sudrajat, A., Aman, A., & Kumalasari, D. (2021). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(2), 545. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796.
  31. Siti Kholidatur Rodiyah. (2019). Ideal Evaluation in Islamic Education Learning. EDUTEC : Journal of Education And Technology, 2 (2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.29062/edu.v2i2.23.
  32. Slepkov, A. D., Van Bussel, M. L., Fitze, K. M., & Burr, W. S. (2021). A Baseline for Multiple-Choice Testing in the University Classroom. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016838.
  33. Sutarno, S., & Hernawati, S. P. (2022). Comparative Study of the Use of Objective Tests and T essays D in Improving Achievement Learning Indonesian Language. PINISI Discretion Review, 5(2), 391. https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v5i2.32434.
  34. Wainer, H., & Braun, H. I.. (1990). Tes validity. New Jersey: Hillsdale 07642.

Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Nadwa: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 INDEXED BY

Journal Terindex di CrossrefJournal Terindex di LeidenJournal Terindex di MorarefJournal Terindex di Google ScholarJournal Terindex di GarudaJournal Terindex di Base

View My Stats
apps