Mapping Research Trends In Teaching And Learning Trajectories In Science Learning

Main Article Content

Abdurrohman Khotim Nugraha
Chaerul Rochman

Abstract

One of the success factors of science learning is determined by the teacher's role in designing learning. A good learning design at least contains three aspects that are mutually sustainable, namely teaching trajectory, learning trajectory, teaching and learning trajectory and authentic assessment. This study aims to map research trends related to teaching and learning trajectory and authentic assessment in science learning. The method used was bibliometric analysis. The sample of articles used amounted to 662 Scopus indexed articles within the last five years. The results of the analysis were then mapped using VOSviewer to show the connections, patterns, correlations and density of research on the topics studied. The mapping results show that not much research has been conducted on teaching and learning trajectories and authentic assessment in science learning over the past five years. Thus, the results of this study are expected to provide a comprehensive picture of the development of research on teaching trajectory, learning trajectory, teaching and learning trajectory and authentic assessment and its implications for educators and or future researchers in designing more effective and innovative science learning designs in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nugraha, A. K., & Rochman, C. (2024). Mapping Research Trends In Teaching And Learning Trajectories In Science Learning. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2024.14.1.21216
Section
Articles

References

Agung Rinaldy Malik, Emzir, & Sri Sumarni. (2020). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Mobile Learning Dan Gaya Belajar Visual Terhadap Penguasaan Kosakatabahasa Jerman Siswa Sma Negeri 1 Maros. Visipena Journal, 11(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v11i1.1090

Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Huu Nghia, T. Le, Boud, D., Johnson, L., & Patrick, C.-J. (2020). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1639613

Aninnas, A., Supeno, S., & Wicaksono, I. (2022). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Video Fenomena Alam dalam Pembelajaran IPA Materi Lapisan Bumi terhadap Kreativitas Ilmiah Siswa MTs. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 10(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v10i1.41188

Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020

Astari, F. N., Singgih, S., & Muhlisin, A. (2023). Implementation of TPSW ( Think Pair Share Write ) Learning Model in High School Science Learning to Increase Students ’ Critical Thinking Ability on Earth and Solar System Matter Implementasi Model Pembelajaran TPSW ( Think Pair Share Write ) Dalam Pembelajaran IPA SMP Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Bumi dan Tata Surya. 13(2), 226–244.

Bakhruddin, M., Shoffa, S., Iis, H., Ginting, S., Fitri, A., Lestari, I. W., E Pudyastuti, Z., Zainuddin, M., Alam, H. V., & Kurniawati, N. (2021). Strategi Belajar Mengajar: Konsep Dasar dan Implementasinya. Penerbit CV. AGRAPANA MEDIA.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities.

Carlson, J., Daehler, K. R., Alonzo, A. C., Barendsen, E., Berry, A., Borowski, A., Carpendale, J., Kam Ho Chan, K., Cooper, R., & Friedrichsen, P. (2019). The refined consensus model of pedagogical content knowledge in science education. Repositioning Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Teachers’ Knowledge for Teaching Science, 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5898-2_2

Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., & Wang, F. L. (2021). Past, present, and future of smart learning: a topic-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00239-6

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2020). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Davis, J., & Elliott, S. (2023). Young children and the environment: Early education for sustainability. Cambridge University Press.

Eck, N. J. Van, & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer.

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A.-T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2024). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. John Wiley & Sons.

Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education.

Harzing, A. W. (2007). Publish or Perish.

Inchaustegui, Y. A., & Alsina, A. (2020). Learning patterns at three years old: Contributions of a learning trajectory and teaching itinerary. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 45(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1836939119885310

Indriyani, N., Hanifah, R., & Fitria, Y. (2023). Penilaian Autentik Pada Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) di Sekolah Dasar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.59789/rarepustaka.v5i2.184

Jayadiningrat, M. G., Widiana, I. W., Ariani, N. W. T., & Widiani, N. K. (2022). Model Pembelajaran Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (STM) DAN Penilaian Autentik terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 5(3), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v5i3.50268

Junaid, M., Salahudin, S., & Anggraini, R. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Ipa Siswa Di Smpn 17 Tebo. Physics and Science Education Journal (PSEJ), 1(April), 16. https://doi.org/10.30631/psej.v1i1.709

Karlina Muzianti, I., Aripin, A., & Sofi Makiyah, Y. (2024). The Effect of The ROPES Learning Model with the Assistance of Crocodile Physics on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Mechanical Waves Material. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2023.13.2.17574

Khoerunisa, R., Octaviani, R. P., Desinta, T. N., Rajabi, W. C., & Rochman, C. (2023). Profil Keefektifan Strategi Teaching and Learning dan Capaian Pembelajaran pada Materi Interferensi Gelombang. 5(1), 1–14.

Kurniasih, Y., Hamdu, G., & Lidinillah, D. A. M. (2020). Rubrik asesmen kinerja berpikir kritis pada pembelajaran STEM dengan media lightning tamiya car. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i2.25172

Kurniawati, I. L., Setyosari, P., Dasna, I. W., & Praherdhiono, H. (2021). Problem-Based Flipped Classroom dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Deepublish.

Lailatunnahar, T. (2021). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Guna Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA di Masa Pandemi Covid 19 pada Siswa Kelas VII. 1 di SMP Negeri Binaan Khusus Kota Dumai. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1084–1094.

Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., & Astronomy Team Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team, B. T. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974

Lukman, N. (2024). DESAIN PEMBELAJARAN LINGKARAN MELALUI PROBLEM BASED LEARNINGBERBANTUANGEOGEBRADANBERORIENTASILITERASI NUMERASI PESERTA DIDIK. Universitas Siliwangi.

Lupita, L., & Hidajat, F. A. (2022). Desain differentiated instruction pada materi statistika untuk peserta didik SMP: alternatif pembelajaran bagi siswa berbakat. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 2(2), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v2i2.194

Main, K. (2020). Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. Routledge.

Malik, A., Al-Hanafi, M. A., Chusni, M. M., & Nugraha, A. R. (2023). Development of CORE-based Electronic-modules to Improve Students’ Problem-Solving Skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6415–6424. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.3172

Martatiyana, D. R., & Madani, F. (2023). Penerapan Asesmen Autentik dalam Praktikum IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia, 6(4), 1741–1760. https://doi.org/10.47134/pgsd.v1i2.242

McAllister, J. T., Lennertz, L., & Atencio Mojica, Z. (2022). Mapping a discipline: a guide to using VOSviewer for bibliometric and visual analysis. Science & Technology Libraries, 41(3), 319–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547

Medriati, R., & Risdianto, E. (2020). Penerapan pendekatan student centered learning (SCL) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif dan komunikatif mahasiswa pendidikan fisika semester III universitas Bengkulu. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(1 April), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.1.67-74

Meilina, I. L., Rohmah, A. A., & Farikha, N. (2023). Studi Literatur Efektivitas Virtual Laboratorium Pada Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(2), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.58706/jipp.v1n2.p40-50

Mulhayatiah, D., Ayuningrat, H. S., Hidayatulloh, R., & Rochman, C. (2024). Relationship Between Learning Style and Critical Thinking Skill Through Hybrid Learning on the Topic of Work and Energy. KnE Social Sciences, 903–912. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16016

Mulhayatiah, D., Kharisma, F. E., Junissetiawati, D., Yuningsih, E. K., & Pitriana, P. (2023). Science process skills through cores and papers analysis of pedagogical content knowledge. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2572(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0118321

Nicolaou, C., & Constantinou, C. (2014). Assessment of the modeling competence: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 13, 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.10.001

Nindyatami, Z., Rochman, C., & Chusni, M. M. (2024). Development Modul Guided Inquiry Integrated Augmented Reality (M-GIIAR) to Improve Student’s Science Process Skills on Mechanical Wave Material. Physics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.21580/perj.2024.6.1.18166

Novak, A. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2007). Using Technology To Support Inquiry In Middle School Science. In Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_5

Nurhaifa, I., Hamdu, G., & Suryana, Y. (2020). Rubrik penilaian kinerja pada pembelajaran stem berbasis keterampilan 4C. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 4(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v4i1.24742

Othman, A., Ibrahim, D. A., Abdullah, N. A., & Umanan, F. (2021). Development of Teaching and Learning Model using TPACK Framework and Effectiveness of e-Learning for Matriculation Chemistry subject: Pembangunan Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran menggunakan kerangka TPACK dan Keberkesanan e-Pembelajaran untuk subjek Kim. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.1.1.2021

Poerwanti, E. (2015). Konsep dasar asesmen pembelajaran. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ragin, G., Refando, A., Dian Chaerani Utami, &, & Tangerang, U. M. (2020). Implementasi Strategi Pembelajaran Ekspositori untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Dakwah, 2(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.30872/jimpian.v3iSE.2923

Rahman, A. (2022). Project Based Learning sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik. Penerbit NEM.

Raihana, F. H. (2023). Implementasi Metode Inquiry Learning Dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berfikir Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ips Kelas Vii Di Mts Mu’allimat Nu Kudus. JIIPSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia, 3(2).

Rochman, C., Mahen, E. C. S., & Nasrudin, D. (2018). Authentic Assessment Based on Teaching and Learning Trajectory With Student Activity Sheet (Sas) on Basic Physics Courses. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v3i1.10373

Rochman, C., Mulhayatiah, D., Sari, I., Suhendi, H. Y., & Nasrudin, D. (2022). Science process skills through PjBL-STEM on global warming concept. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2600(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117201

Saenab, S., Yunus, S. R., & Husain, H. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Project Based Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Kolaborasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan IPA. Biosel: Biology Science and Education, 8(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v8i1.844

Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Michel-Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024). Using generative artificial intelligence tools to explain and enhance experiential learning for authentic assessment. Education Sciences, 14(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010083

Sari, P., Dwikoranto, D., & Lestari, N. A. (2021). Analisis respon dan ketertarikan peserta didik terhadap pelaksanaan pembelajaran fisika berbasis environmental learning di SMA. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(3), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.3.337-344

Setiawan, H., & Sa’dijah, C. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen autentik kompetensi pada ranah keterampilan untuk pembelajaran tematik di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(7), 874–882. https://doi.org/10.35724/musjpe.v2i1.1944

Shofiah, S., Rahmadhani, N., Rachman, M. Z., Putri, S., Zahra, R., Anggraeni, T., Pramadiana, S., & Rochman, C. (2023). Profil capaian pembelajaran dan keefektifan strategi teaching and learning trajectory pada materi hukum biot savart. 2, 529–534.

Siahaan, K. W. A., Lumbangaol, S. T. P., Marbun, J., Nainggolan, A. D., Ritonga, J. M., & Barus, D. P. (2020). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif berbentuk Multiple Representasi terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Penguasaan Konsep IPA. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.614

Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205

Sood, S. K., Kumar, N., & Saini, M. (2021). Scientometric analysis of literature on distributed vehicular networks: VOSViewer visualization techniques. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-021-09980-4

Suhardi, D. (2021). Penilaian Autentik Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMAN 1 Pagaden. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i1.79

Suparsawan, I. K. (2020). Kolaborasi Pendekatan Saintifik dengan Model Pembelajaran STAD Geliatkan Peserta Didik. Tata Akbar.

Tahir, S. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Literasi Sains di Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Pallangga. JURNAL PEMIKIRAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN PEMBELAJARAN, 5(3), 78–87.

Virawanti, T. (2022). Desain Pembelajaran Bilangan Berpangkat Melalui Inkuiri Terbimbing Menggunakan Google Jamboard. Universitas Siliwangi.

Widyanto, I. P., & Vienlentia, R. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik menggunakan Student Centered Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 7(4), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v7i4.15215

Winasis, S. (2021). Penerapan metode student teams achievement divisions (stad) disertai authentic assessment untuk meningkatkan partisipasi dan penguasaan konsep dalam pembelajaran biologi siswa kelas VII A SMP Negeri 3 Nguter.

Zaifullah, Z., Cikka, H., & Kahar, M. I. (2021). Strategi Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Interaksi Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Keberhasilan Peserta Didik Dalam Menghadapi Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Di Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Guru Tua: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.31970/gurutua.v4i2.70

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.