THE GRAMMATICAL ERRORS ON THE PARAGRAPH WRITINGS

Authors

  • Nadiah Ma’mun UIN Walisongo Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv5i1862

Keywords:

paragraph writing and grammatical error

Abstract

This paper makes a study of grammatical error on paragraph writings of English department students. The students were asked to write the paragraph of writing as their final assignment for paragraph based writing Class. The errors found in the students’ compositions are then classified based on the surface strategy taxonomy on errors of omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. Based on the result of  the research findings whole have been analyzed and the discussions which have been presented, the writer generally concluded that there are four kinds of errors which are omission, addition, misinformation and misordering. The writer found that mostly the students had grammatical error on their writing in mis-information error 43%. They consist of misinformation of adverb, V2, subject-verb agreement, article, modal, passive and word choices. It also can be concluded that most students of intermediate level made Grammatical Error in Omission and Misinformation of their paragraph writing as  Dulaay at.all (1982) said that Omission of to be is common error made by students. Even tough those sentences appear without to be, article or preposition and still have meaning, student must use the Grammar correctly or accurately in writing. Most students made grammatical error in using modal, for example of error in misinformatiom “We  can learning all about English, after modal must be followed by main verb. It mostly happened on students’ writing. The most common types of  errors made  b y  students  are misinformation with  the  number  of  errors  is  15  or  43% and o m i s s i o n  with the number of error is 11 or 31%. The type of errors with the lowest frequency is misordering errors (9%). They consist of misordering of noun phrase and misordering of adverb. These errors seem to be caused by interlingual and intralingual interference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azar, Betty Schranpfer. 1989. Understanding and Using English Grammar. Jersey New. Prentice-Hall inc.

Brown, Douglas H. 2000. Prenciple of Language and Teaching, addision Wesley: Longman.

Carl James. 1998. Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. London: Longman.

Coder, Spit. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University press. Oxford

Dullay, Heidi. 1983. Language Two. Oxford University Press. New York

Ellis, Rod. 1997. Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press, New York

Ellis, Rod and Barkhuizen gary. 2008. Analysing Learner Language. Oxford University Press. China

Frances Gorbet. 1979. To Err is Human‘: Error Analysis and Child Language Acquisition, English Language Teaching Journal, XXXIV.

Harmer, Jeremy. 1983. The practice of English Language Teaching. Longman. USA

Hewings, Martin. 2002. Advanced Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hubbard, Petter. 1983. A Training Course for TEFL. Oxford University Press. New York.

John Norrish. 1983. Language Learners and Their Errors,London: Macmillan Press.

Nirmala, Deli. 2009. Kesalahan Gramatical Abstrak Tesis. Issued in kajian Sastra Journal.

Norris, John. 1983. Language Learner and Their Errors. Macmillan: New York.

Richards, Jack C. 1974. Error Analysis. Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman Group.

Rod Ellis and Gary Barkhuizen. 2008. Analysing Learner Langaue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Subroto, D.E. 1992, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Lingusitik. Surakarta: UMS Press

Swan, Michael .(1995). Practical Englsih Usage. Oxford University Press. England

Thomson, A.J and Martinet, A.V. (1995). A Practical English Grammar. Oxford University Press. England

Downloads

Published

2016-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles