North Bali Students’ Online Learning Self-Efficacy, Engagement, and Satisfaction

Putu Dinia Suryandani*  -  Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia
Made Hery Santosa  -  Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: 10.21580/vjv10i28921

This study aimed to investigate the relationship among online learning self-efficacy, engagement, and students’ satisfaction in online learning. The design of this study was mixed-method research through surveys and open-ended interview with the purposive sampling technique. The quantitative data were analyzed using multiple regression. The respondents were 24 postgraduate students from North Bali, Indonesia. The quantitative data were analyzed using correlation and regression techniques, and an open-ended interview was conducted. The research results showed a positive correlation between online learning self-efficacy, engagement, and students’ satisfaction. The study concludes that students’ satisfaction can be enhanced by increasing students’ online learning self-efficacy and engagement either individually or simultaneously. The implication of this study revealed that strategies in self-efficacy and engagement during learning-related emotions could play a mediating role in academic satisfaction. Additionally, learning-related emotion impacts the metacognitive learning procedures, which thus intervene the impact of satisfaction in online learning.

Keywords: online learning, self-efficacy, engagement, satisfaction

  1. Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75361-4
  3. Bower, M., & Sturman, D. (2015). What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Computers and Education, 88, 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.013
  4. Buelow, J. R., Barry, T., & Rich, L. E. (2018). Supporting learning engagement with online students. Online Learning Journal, 22(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i4.1384
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. (M. P. Scott, Ed.). University of Nebraska-Lincoln: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  6. de Paepe, L., Zhu, C., & Depryck, K. (2018). Drop-out, retention, satisfaction and attainment of online learners of Dutch in adult education. International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 17(3), 303–323.
  7. Doo, M. Y., & Bonk, C. J. (2020). The effects of self-efficacy, self-regulation and social presence on learning engagement in a large university class using flipped Learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12455
  8. Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments This. NCPEA International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 98–119.
  9. Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Lin, P. H. (2017). Intrinsic motivation of Chinese learning in predicting online learning self-efficacy and flow experience relevant to students’ learning progress. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1329215
  10. Jiwa, R. N. F., Tanduklangi, A., & Sailan, Z. (2017). Cognitive Style, Attitude, and Self Efficacy as Predictors of Student Success in EFL Online Courses at Halu Oleo University. … of Language Education and Educational …, 2(2). Retrieved from http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JLEET/article/view/6695
  11. Kalaycı, Ş. (2009). SPSS Applied multivariate statistical techniques. Ankara: Asil Publishing.
  12. Kreth, Q., Spirou, M. E., Budenstein, S., & Melkers, J. (2019). How prior experience and self-efficacy shape graduate student perceptions of an online learning environment in computing. Computer Science Education, 29(4), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1601459
  13. Landrum, B. (2020). Examining students’ confidence to learn online, self-regulation skills and perceptions of satisfaction and usefulness of online classes. Online Learning Journal, 24(3), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i3.2066
  14. Lin, S., Hu, H. C., & Chiu, C. K. (2020). Training Practices of Self-efficacy on Critical Thinking Skills and Literacy: Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112202
  15. Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high- and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.082
  16. Morgan, H. (2019). Online Instruction and Virtual Schools for Middle and High School Students : Twenty-First-Century Fads or Progressive Teaching Methods for Today ’ s Pupils ? The Clearing House, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2015.1007909
  17. Muzammil, M., Sutawijaya, A., & Harsasi, M. (2020). Investigating Student Satisfaction in Online Learning: the Role of Student Interaction and Engagement in Distance Learning University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, (July), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770928
  18. O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
  19. Panadero, E., & Alonso-tapia, J. (2014). How do students self- regulate ? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicología, 30, 450–462.
  20. Skinner, E., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. (The handbo). New York: NY: Springer Science.
  21. Strawser, M., Kercsmar, S., & Pennell, M. (2017). A Blended Basic Course Examination of Communication Apprehension and Self-Efficacy: A Comparative Analysis. Basic Communication Course Annual, 29(1), 6.
  22. Wolverton, C. C., Guidry Hollier, B. N., & Lanier, P. A. (2020). The impact of computer self efficacy on student engagement and group satisfaction in online business courses. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 18(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.34190/EJEL.20.18.2.006
  23. Yu, X., Wang, C. X., & Spector, J. M. (2020). Factors that impact social networking in online self-regulated learning activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3077–3095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09843-9
  24. Zimmerman, W. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2016). Online Learning Self-Efficacy in Students With and Without Online Learning Experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Putu Dinia Suryandani, Made Hery Santosa
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by

    

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Publisher
English Education Department,
Faculty of Education and Teacher Training,
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Jl. Prof Hamka Ngaliyan Semarang, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

apps