How Does She Learn English? A Case of a Successful Blind Language Learner

Sakineh Jafari  -  (Scopus ID 57209111954) English Department, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Samaneh Jafari  -  (Scopus ID 56950087900) Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, United States
Reza Kafipour*  -  (Scopus ID 35118849400) English Department, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, Islamic Republic of

(*) Corresponding Author

This study reports on a case study of a blind EFL learner. The purpose of the study was to explore a detailed situated data to examine to what extent it is feasible to be a successful language learner despite being visually impaired and lacking some learning resources.  Interview data and the narratives of this EFL learner have revealed that her success was mainly based on her agentic interaction with the environment and learning context, her high motivation and strategic behavior, and her sustained efforts. The findings provide further insight into the role of learner in exerting control over contextual resources that frame learning and on how different factors interact with each other in the language learning process in the construction of learner identity and the strategies used by learners.

Keywords : agency; contextual resources; identity, learning resources; learning context; strategic behavior

  1. Bandura, A., (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bandura, A., (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 1-26.
  3. Benson, P., Lor,W., (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System 27, 459-72.
  4. Bown, J., (2009). Self-regulatory strategies and agency in self-instructed language learning; a situated view. The Modern Language Journal 93 (4), 570-583.
  5. Carter, B., Sealey, A., (2000). Language, structure and agency: what can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics 4 (1), 3-20.
  6. Cotterall, S., (2008). Autonomy and good language learners.In Griffiths, C., (Ed). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 110-130.
  7. Dornyei, Z., (2009). Individual differences: interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning 59 (1), 230-248.
  8. Dornyie, Z., (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual Differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  9. Duff, P., ( 2008). Case Study Research in Applied linguistics. New York, Routledge.
  10. Ehrman, M., Leaver, B., Oxford, R., (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System 31, 313-330.
  11. Ellis, R., (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, Oxford university Press
  12. Erikson, F., (2004). Demystifying data construction and analysis. Anthropology and education Quarterly 35, 486-493.
  13. Gaith, G., Shaaban, K., Harkous, S., (2007). An investigation of relationship between forms of positive interdependence, social support, and selected aspects of classroom climate. System 35, 229-240.
  14. Gao, X., (2006). Understanding changes in Chinese students' uses of learning strategies in China and Britain: a sociocultural re-interpretation . System 34 (1), 55-67.
  15. Gao, X., (2010). Strategic Language Learning: the Roles of agency and Context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
  16. Gao, X., (2010). Autonomous language learning against all odds. System 38, 580-590.
  17. Griffiths, C., (2008). Strategies and good language learners. In Griffiths, C., (Ed).Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 83-98.
  18. Lantolf, J., (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language teaching 33, 79-69.
  19. Lantolf, J.P., Beckett, T.G., (2009). Research timeline: Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language teaching 42 (4), 459-475.
  20. Larsen-Freeman, D., (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 18 (2), 141-165.
  21. Larsen-Freeman, D., Cameron, L., (2008). Complex system and Applied linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  22. Mercer, S., (2011).Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System 39, 427-436.
  23. Nassaji, H., Swain, M., (2000) A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness 1, 34-52.
  24. Niaman, N., Frohich, H., Stern, H., Todesco, A., (1975). The good language learner. Ontario Institute of Studies for Education.
  25. Norton, B., Toohey, K., (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly 35(2), 307-322.
  26. Norton, B., (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29(1), 9-31.
  27. Palfreyman, D., (2006). Social context and resources for language learning. System 34, 352-370.
  28. Rose, H., (2012). Reconceptualizing Strategic Learning in the Face of Self-Regulation: Throwing Language Learning Strategies out with the Bathwater. Applied Linguistics 33 (1), 92-98.
  29. Rubin, J., (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9, 41-51.
  30. Takeuchi, O., (2003). What can we learn from good foreign language learners? A qualitative study in Japanese foreign language context. System 31, 385-392.
  31. Tanaka, K., (2004). Changes in Japanese students' beliefs about language learning and English language proficiency in a study-abroad context. PhD thesis, University of Auckland.
  32. Ushioda, E., (2007). Motivation, autonomy and sociocultural theory, In; Benson , P, (Ed.), Learner autonomy 8; Teacher and Learner Perspectives. Authentik, Dublin, pp. 5-24.
  33. Ushioda, E., (2008). Motivation and good language learners.In Griffiths, C., (Ed).Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 19-34.
  34. Ushioda, E., Dornyei, Z., (2009). Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: a theoretical overview. In: Ushioda, E., Dornyie, Z., (Eds.), Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: Second Language Acquisition. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp. 1-8.
  35. Van Lier, L., (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy, and Authenticity. London,, Longman.
  36. Wenden, A., (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics 19, 515-537.
  37. Wenden, A., (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics 23, 32-55.

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning is indexed by

       

Vision: Journal of Language and Foreign Language Learning

To improve the quality of the journal, since 25 July 2020, this journal officially had made cooperation with ELITE Association Indonesia (The Association of Teachers of English Linguistics, Literature & Education). See The MoU Manuscript.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 
View My Stats
apps